Read & edited by Sam Nolan
Podcast description
There are many people who have the skills and desire to do EA-aligned research, or who could develop such skills via some experience, mentorship, or similar. There are many potentially high-priority open research questions that have been identified. And there are many funders who would be happy to pay for high-quality research on such questions. Sounds like everything must be lining up perfectly, right? In my view, the answer is fairly clearly “No”, and getting closer to a “Yes” could be very valuable. The three ingredients mentioned above do regularly combine to give us new, high-quality research and researchers, but:
This is happening slower than we’d like
This is requiring more “overhead” than seems ideal
There are more “misfires” than we’d like
Links mentioned in the related previous work section
Subscribe to the podcast if you'd like more narrations of particularly interesting forum posts.
Anchor link to podcast page: https://anchor.fm/ea-forum-podcast
RSS feed: https://anchor.fm/s/62cbeec4/podcast/rss
If you are interested in narrating posts yourself, editing, organizing, or anything else which could help with production, sign up using this form. Alternatively, you can comment on this post, or simply message me or @david_reinstein if perchance you dislike filling out forms.
Also listen to David's podcast Found in the Struce (RSS), where he narrates, and adds additional commentary to interesting EA Forum posts.
I said I wasn't going to publish this as a frontpage post, but I misclicked a button during the posting process. Sorry. It'd be nice if an moderator could take it off the frontpage.