Comments
Are there plans to release the videos from EAGx Virtual?
Are there plans to release the videos from EAGx Virtual?
Yes! We'll need to review footage and confirm with speakers, but they should be up soon :)
Recordings from various 2023 EA conferences are now live on our YouTube channel. These include talks from EAG Bay Area, EAG London, EAG Boston, EAGxLatAm, EAGxIndia, EAGxNordics, and EAGxBerlin (alongside many other talks from previous years).
In an effort to cut costs, this year some of our conferences had fewer recorded talks than normal, though we still managed to record over 100 talks across the year. This year also involved some of our first Spanish-language content, recorded at EAGxLatAm in Mexico City. Listening to talks can be a great way to learn more about EA and stay up to date on EA cause areas, and recording them allows people who couldn’t attend (or who were busy in 1:1 meetings) to watch them in their own time.
Some highlighted talks are displayed below:
In this talk Ethan presents on how AI systems like ChatGPT can be used to help uncover potential risks in other AI systems, such as tendencies towards power-seeking, self-preservation, and sycophancy.
People farm a lot of pigs. They farm even more chickens. And if they don’t already, they’re soon to farm even more black soldier flies. How should EAs distribute their resources to address these problems? And how should EAs compare benefits to animals with benefits to humans?
This talk outlines a framework for answering these questions. Bob Fischer argues that we should use estimates of animals’ welfare ranges to compare how much good different interventions can accomplish. He also suggests some tentative welfare range estimates for several farmed species.
Effective altruism is driven by the pursuit to maximize impact. But what counts as impact? One approach is to focus directly on improving people’s happiness — how they feel during and about their lives.
In this session, Michael Plant and Mark Fabian discuss how and whether to do this, and what it might mean for doing good differently. Michael starts by presenting the positive case — why happiness matters and how it can be measured — then shares the Happier Lives Institute’s recent research on the implications and suggesting directions for future work. Mark Fabian acts as a critical discussant and highlights key weaknesses and challenges with ‘taking happiness seriously’. After their exchange, these issues open up to the floor.
This panel joins together Rear Admiral John Gower, Patricia Lewis, and Paul Ingram for a panel on a conversation exploring the future of arms control, managing nuclear tensions with Russia, China's changing nuclear strategy, and more.
In this opening session, hear talks from three community members (Lizka Vaintrob, Kuhan Jeyapragasan, and Arden Koehler) as they give some thoughts on EA and the current state of the community.
Pandemic security aims to safeguard the future of civilisation from exponentially spreading biological threats. In this talk, Kevin outlines two distinct scenarios—"Wildfire" and "Stealth"—by which pandemic-causing pathogens could cause societal collapse. He then explains the ‘Delay, Detect, Defend’ plan to prevent such pandemics, including the key technological programmes his team oversees to mitigate pandemic risk: a DNA synthesis screening system that prevents malicious actors from synthesizing and releasing pandemic-causing pathogens; a pathogen-agnostic wastewater biosurveillance system for early detection of novel pathogens; AI/bio capability evaluations and technical risk mitigation strategies; and pandemic-proof PPE.
This panel has speakers share their experiences and takeaways from working on community building projects in LMICs, namely the Philippines, South Africa, Russia, Nigeria, Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia.
The panel consists of Jordan Pieters, Zakariyau Yusuf, Elemerei Cuevas, Leo Arrunda, Angela Aristizábal, Sandra Malagón, and Aleksandr Berezhnoi.
The session introduces air pollution in South Asia as an EA cause area, and provides a brief overview of the South Asian Air Quality program at Open Philanthropy. Santosh outlines major sub-strategies that we will be focusing on and the types of grant opportunities that are likely to be cost-effective.
In this thought-provoking talk, Anders touches upon various factors that could shape the trajectory of humanity, drawing from multiple disciplines to provide a broad perspective. He explores the implications of different potential outcomes and how understanding these possibilities can inform our actions in the present.
Lord Martin Rees is the Astronomer Royal and Co-founder of the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk. He is a former President of the Royal Society, former Master of Trinity College, and Emeritus Professor of Cosmology and Astrophysics, and is the author of 10 books including ‘If Science is to Save Us’ and ‘Our Final Century’. The interview covers both his career and his views on key open questions in the field of existential risk studies.
This talk explores the concept of intercausal impacts and analyses food system change as a prime example, given that our current food system not only causes vast amounts of animal suffering but also is a key driver in many other of the world’s most pressing problems.
These are useful, thanks. I would suggest we also enable/permit a lower-quality recording to be posted or shared of the other talks. It should be fairly costless to have a few people record and post these with camera phones, etc., and I believe it would add substantial value.
Thanks for the suggestion David — we've thought about this and might consider it for the future, but I worry it would be a fair amount of work for a low-quality product (that I expect wouldn't get many views). However for our recent Boston event we did take audio recordings of most talks and are planning to have many of them written up as Forum posts soon.
Audio recordings would be good, thanks.
Not sure about the benefit/cost. Am I naive to think something like:
Time cost: Maybe 1-2 hours of 'equivalent extra person work' per 1-hour session (say 90 minutes).
Benefit: If even 5-10 people watch the videos, I suspect the value outweighs the cost.
Enabling them to shift time; e.g., do 1-on-1's if attending ...
Encouraging some people to not come in person (saving tremendous expense obviously)
Presenter and their team can re-watch the video to improve their own presentation, as well as using it for onboarding etc.
My guess (very rough) is the value 'per watcher who spends at least 20 minutes viewing on the talk' has about 20% of the value of the 90 minutes spent by the person filming and uploading on average.
(Obviously more so if it's a highly productive person doing the watching, or if the speaker themselves watches it to improve their presentation.)
So I guess if at least 5 people watch the average video for 20 minutes or more, this would be worth doing. Not sure how that compares to the statistics you've seen on usage.
Could it be enabled on a 'strictly voluntary basis', i.e., give permission for people to record certain sessions, announce this, and upload it to an (unofficial?) channel?