Comments
Would recommend, INFER's team functionality is great.
Would recommend, INFER's team functionality is great.
This tournament is co-sponsored by Cambridge EA (coordinated by Hannah Erlebach) and UChicago EA (coordinated by Henry Josephson). Thanks to Henry Tolchard for clarifying details about the tournament, and to Will Aldred for feedback on this post.
INFER, a forecasting program funded by a grant from Open Philanthropy to generate valuable signals for U.S. Government policymakers, is hosting an intercollegiate forecasting tournament for EA groups. Any EA group affiliated with a university is welcome to participate in the tournament. The top three individual forecasters will be offered paid positions on the Pro Forecaster Program.
The tournament is scheduled to run April 1 - July 31, 2022.
For full details, see INFER’s tournament page.
You can also find the full instructions here.
Getting started should take no more than a couple of minutes; it requires individuals to create an account, and a designated team host to create a team by submitting the usernames of team members.
(For all team members) How to sign up
(For the team host) How to create your team
(For all team members) How to interact with your team
You will be able to interact with members of your team in different areas of the site, for example:
Forecasting is currently in 80,000 Hours’ list of ten top-recommended career paths (as of date of publishing). You can read their review of forecasting and related research and implementation here.
Quantitative forecasting can substantially improve our ability to predict the future, as compared with subjective judgement calls. Better predictions about important future events can lead to better decisions, especially in the complex, high-stakes situations in which governments and other institutions frequently find themselves. Better foresight could also maybe improve our ability to solve some of the world’s most pressing problems.
What makes forecasting particularly accessible is that:
The best forecasters come from a wide range of backgrounds, often from fields which aren’t related to predicting the future. Indeed, the bar for being a top forecaster at present may be surprisingly low; while some intelligence, numerical skill and general knowledge is helpful, it is often open-mindedness, carefulness and an ability to update one’s beliefs which appear more critical.
The power of forecasting platforms (the likes of INFER, Metaculus, Good Judgment Open, Hypermind and Metaforecast) lies in crowd forecasts: aggregating the predictions of many forecasters, typically with more weight on the forecasts of those individuals with the best track records. Indeed, according to one study described in Superforecasting (Tetlock & Gardner, 2019), aggregating the forecasts of several hundred ‘ordinary people’ on geopolitical events led to better predictions than professional intelligence analysts who had access to classified information. For a more nuanced discussion of this study and others, see Comparing top forecasters and domain experts.
An important part of developing forecasting skills is calibration training: being well calibrated as a forecaster means that your predictions match the rates of outcomes actually occurring, e.g., the events to which you assign an 80% probability actually resolve positively around 80% of the time. Good calibration doesn’t tend to come naturally, but can be substantially improved through practice.
Some recommended tools for beginners to get started with calibration training include:
If you want to learn more about forecasting, you might like to look at:
The tournament is taking place April 1 - July 31, 2022.
Teams can still sign up after April 1, but should be aware that they are required to have 5+ active forecasters every month (April, May, June, July) in order to be eligible for a prize.
The tournament is between teams of 5 or more people affiliated with an EA university group. (There can be multiple teams per university, as long as each team has at least 5 members.) Note that you don’t need to be a student in order to participate, as long as you have some affiliation with the EA uni group whose team you join.
INFER regularly releases new questions on the platform. Forecasters are also invited to submit their own, and can vote on others’, in the Question Lab.
Questions are currently divided into six topics:
A subset of the questions on the platform will be scored as part of the tournament, typically those that can be resolved over the course of the tournament. These will be indicated on the platform. (The questions used for the tournament will all be posted publicly on the site, so non-tournament participants can also forecast on them.)
New tournament questions will be released fairly evenly throughout the tournament, and there are expected to be around 15-20 questions in total which will be scored for the tournament (there’ll also be non-tournament questions, which you can still forecast on but won’t be scored!)
Your task as a participant is to submit your forecasts individually. The individual forecasts made by your team members will then be aggregated into a team forecast score. You will also be able to update your forecasts over time by entering new forecasts. The best forecasters tend to update their forecasts gradually as new information becomes available.
To make a forecast on INFER, select a question, read through the background information, and simply enter the probability (0-100%) you think an event will occur. You’ll also be asked to enter a rationale to explain why you entered that particular probability before you submit your forecast. This gives you a chance to explain the reasoning behind your forecast and/or provide any links that may support your position, which provides useful data for policymakers. Here is a helpful article with tips on how to approach your first forecast.
To give a flavour for the kinds of questions you’ll be forecasting on, here are some already on INFER which may be included in the tournament:
Scoring will be completed through INFER and use a relative brier scoring system. The three most accurate teams (those with the lowest relative brier score) will be rewarded with prize money.
This prize money can be awarded as sponsorship to the university group or to a cause of your choice (in accordance with INFER’s charitable guidelines).
In order to be eligible for a prize, teams need to have 5+ active forecasters per month.
In addition, the more active forecasters participate in the tournament each month, the higher the pot for the winning teams:
We think that entering a team for your EA university group can be beneficial in many ways, not just in terms of prizes, but in creating a community around forecasting. Some of these include:
The top three individual forecasters from the INFER Tournament will be invited to join the Pro Forecasters Program for the remainder of the 2022 season (i.e., through December). As a Pro Forecaster, you will be paid for dedicating a certain amount of time every month to forecasting. Some highlights of what the program will entail this season include:
In addition, all forecasters on INFER are eligible to complete challenges to earn badges and win rewards; there are currently four active reward challenges, with prizes totalling over $12K for accuracy, monthly participation, research efforts and more.
Other benefits to participants in the INFER Tournament include:
INFER, short for INtegrated Forecasting and Estimates of Risk, is a forecasting program designed to generate valuable signals and early warning about the future of critical science and technology trends and events for U.S. Government policymakers. INFER empowers scientists, researchers, analysts, and hobbyists from inside and outside the U.S. Government to have a direct impact on policy and decision-making.
INFER is run by the Applied Research Laboratory for Intelligence and Security (ARLIS) at the University of Maryland and Cultivate Labs. Funding for this program has been provided by a grant from Open Philanthropy.
INFER works by operating as a continuous, 4-step lifecycle between policymakers and those who are best positioned to make relevant forecasts about the future.
If you have any more questions, email [email protected].
Awesome, thanks for making this happen!
Is it possible for multiple university groups to join forces? I think many EA groups would struggle to have 5 active participants. E.g. my uni group was among the most active in the previous EA forecasting tournament and iirc we were mostly 4 active people.
Hey, that's a good question - if you're really struggling, you can form a joint team with another uni group, as long as you have at least 5 team members between you. In this case, prize money would be split 50/50 between the university groups.
In addition, as long as some members of your team are members of the EA uni group you're entering for, you're welcome to recruit other friends in order to get to 5 team members.