Comments
Thanks a lot for this useful overview, Grace!
US aid freeze – how to help & where to donate: GWWC's February Newsletter
5 min readMar 17, 2025
63
Below is the introduction to Giving What We Can's February 2025 newsletter, sent late February. Some information may now be out of date but we were encouraged to post this on the Forum as it contains practical information for thinking about donating!
EDIT 20th March: An non-final version of the newsletter was posted here in error. We are updating the "What's being done & how you can help" and "Supporting affected high-impact programs" sections to reflect the correct version.
It’s hard to believe the global health landscape has changed so significantly in just one month. We wanted to update our community on what we know so far and how this might impact your donation decisions.
(There is a lot to cover, so this newsletter will be a bit longer than usual!)
The US aid funding freeze has left millions without access to critical global health services. While a judicial order was issued to temporarily reverse the freeze, the government is unlikely to comply. USAID staff & access to systems have been gutted, and – despite the government’s stated waiver program for life-saving work – many qualifying programs aren’t able to obtain waivers, and many who have them aren’t able to actually get the funding the waivers promise.
Many are wondering: “Is there anything I can do?”
The good news is that several folks within the effective giving ecosystem are stepping up to help fill the funding gaps created by the chaos and help affected high-impact organisations continue their programmes. We’ll provide some information below about how you can support this crucial work. But first, here are a few things to keep in mind as you think about what this means for your donation decisions:
The situation is highly uncertain. It’s important to note that there’s a lot we don’t know and that it’s been difficult for organisations working on this to get clarity. It’s unclear if/how much funding will eventually resume and if it does, to which programs. This makes cost-effectiveness calculations extremely difficult.
Cost-effectiveness is more important than ever. It is unlikely all affected programs will be able to restart work & rebuild operations. Prioritising the most cost-effective programs means we can essentially make money go further – restoring protection to more people.
GiveWell-supported programs are experiencing effects from the freeze, to varying degrees. While GiveWell’s top charity programs don't receive direct USAID funding, some GiveWell top charities are indirectly impacted by the freeze; for example, some may rely on USAID-funded programs or suppliers to carry out their operations. Additionally, some of GiveWell's other grantees beyond top charities do receive direct USAID funding.
We continue to recommend GiveWell programs. At this time, we do not recommend stopping support for GiveWell programs to instead support funds that have been explicitly set up to fill funding gaps. If you are donating to GiveWell programs, you are already supporting the type of work that has been cut – and doing so through highly cost-effective programs.
As mentioned above, some of GiveWell’s All Grants Fund and Top Charities Fund may be used to support programs affected by the freeze. We also know of two funds that have been set up explicitly to attempt to fill funding gaps for affected organisations.
While our research team has not evaluated the grantmaking of either fund in detail, we currently expect the Rapid Response Fund to be the more cost-effective option of the two, given it specifically supports organisations that are included on Founders Pledge’s or The Life You Can Save’s list of recommended organisations or that otherwise meet their cost-effectiveness criteria.
We do not know how donating to this fund compares to donating to the All Grants Fund or Top Charities Fund. In such an uncertain situation, it’s difficult to know how the strategy of explicitly prioritising direct grants to affected organisations compares to the one GiveWell is taking, and some donors may prefer one approach over the other.
The Rapid Response Fund: Launched by Founders Pledge & The Life You Can Save, this fund aims to fill critical funding gaps for top recommendations & other high-impact organisations affected by the USAID freeze, so they can continue life-saving programs. Read more and donate here.
Unlock Aid’s Bridge Fund: This fund is not explicitly tied to the effective giving ecosystem; some of the coalition partners are recommended by impact-focused evaluators but many are not. While its stated criteria seem to prioritise cost-effective organisations, we have not looked into their cost-effectiveness bar and would expect (though we are not certain) that this fund is overall less cost-effective than supporting the Rapid Response Fund. Read more and donate here.
Funding gaps for life-saving global health programs are not new. Even with the US responsible for 42% of the global humanitarian aid tracked by the UN, aid spending by the US accounts for a tiny fraction of its total budget, ranging from 0.7% – 1.4% from 2001 to 2025. Government aid has long fallen short of providing life-saving services for those who need them, leading to around 14,000 children dying daily from mostly preventable causes, and nonprofits have long had to step in to help fill the gap left by governments. Now this gap is much, much wider.
In other words, the current situation significantly worsens an ongoing crisis that is usually “silent” – bringing visibility to the hard fact that there are people in the world whose lives are ending simply because there isn’t enough funding and/or infrastructure for low-cost interventions like malaria nets, safe water, and essential nutrients to reach them.
Ordinary individuals have the power to help provide this funding and are often unaware of both the scale of the problem and the power they have to make a concrete difference. If people in your life are distressed over the USAID crisis, I hope you’ll help them feel less powerless by sharing the funding opportunities above. If you support GiveWell programs, share that as well – talk about why you’ve chosen to support these programs even before the aid freeze, and how much more important your support is now. Bring visibility to the ongoing “silent” crisis that will unfortunately persist even if USAID-funded programs can restart operations.
Effective giving is more important now than ever, and collective action can’t be underestimated. Let’s work together to deliver life-saving services to those in need by supporting (and spreading the word about) highly impactful programs – with the hope that this support will continue long after the headlines die down.
As usual, we’re sharing plenty of other news below.
With gratitude and hope,
Grace Adams & the Giving What We Can Team
You can read the rest of our newsletter for February here: https://www.givingwhatwecan.org/en/blog/february-newsletter-us-aid-freeze-how-to-help-and-where-to-donate
This was a very helpful post, thanks! Do you know of any way for UK donors to give to the rapid response fund? If not, has GWWC considered trying to set that up? (Like I think you have with a bunch of other charities)