I asked if EA has a rational debate methodology in writing that people sometimes use. The answer seems to be “no”.
I asked if EA has any alternative to rationally resolve disagreements. The answer seems to be “no”.
If the correct answer to either question is actually “yes”, please let me know by responding to that question.
My questions were intended to form a complete pair. Do you use X for rationality, and if not do you use anything other than X?
Does EA have some other way of being rational which wasn’t covered by either question? Or is something else going on?
My understanding is that rationality is crucial to EA’s mission (of basically applying rationality, math, evidence, etc., to charity – which sounds great to me) so I think the issue I’m raising is important and relevant.