Given current developments in the USA, where most of our communication is hosted, many organizations and individuals should revisit their thinking around operational security.
Here are five things I consider facts:
US spy agencies have in the past had on-demand access to all data stored by US companies, and in many cases even taken full copies by default.
AI has almost completely removed the friction and cost associated with evaluating each individual message's contents or creating profiles on each person.
The current administration is taking direct control of many agencies at will, and ignoring checks and balances.
An increasing list of concepts, keywords and associations can land you on the list of organizations or persons considered "woke" or "radical leftist" (Note: the NIST just instructed AISI to eliminate any mention of "AI safety", probably not yet as bad as working on climate science, but the direction is clear).
It would be trivially easy for a US agency to make a list of almost all EAs, if it doesn't exist already
Cross-posted from my Substack.
Epistemic status: I’ve puzzled over this for a long time but I’m not sure I came to the right answers. I'm sharing this partly because it might help others work on resource allocation, but mostly because some smarter reader might tell me how to do it better.
TL;DR:
* I he...
With the AI windfall, mental health may be taken increasingly seriously by mainstream EA. There’s increasingly room to explore the cause area and answer some of the biggest uncertainties; at the same time, costs of the most effective interventions are continuing to fall. StrongMinds is now treating for ~$35, about a third of GiveWell’s best guess from a few years ago, and is expected to...