Comments
Nice summary!
You mentioned the existing organisations managing each threat, are there any new orgs you'd like to see in the future?
Nice summary!
You mentioned the existing organisations managing each threat, are there any new orgs you'd like to see in the future?
Thank you, and very good question! The short answer is not really. I think that building momentum on existential risk reduction from the space sector could be tractable. One way to do this would be to found organisations that tackle some of the cosmic threats with unknown severity and probability. But to be honest I'm not sure if that's necessary, maybe the LTTF or other governments and organisations should just fund some more research into these threats.
I think the main area in which EAs can have an impact is by developing existing organisations, with the aim of increasing their power to enforce policy, developing their interconnectedness, and increasing their prevalence. By doing this, we may be able to increase great power collaboration, build up institutions that will naturally evolve into space governance structures for the long term, while helping to tackle natural existential risks directly.
I'm making a post about this strategy at the moment, so happy to elaborate, but I don't want to write the whole post in one comment! Here's a diagram from the post draft to show how well covered most areas in space are:
Nice post, Jordan!
Cosmic Threat [Severity of worst case scenario /10] [Probability of that scenario occurring in the next 100 years] Explanation of threat
Do you mean "probability of something at least as bad as that scenario occurring the next 100 years"? I am thinking that the severity distribution is continuous, such that the probability of discrete scenarios is 0.
Have you considered assessing the severity in terms of population loss? It would maybe be easier to interpret.
Yes good point, thank you. I have updated the post to clarify that the probability estimate is for a scenario as bad as the worst case.
I think that if I do it as severity in terms of population loss, it will be a lot harder to pin down. In the severity scores I'm also thinking about how badly it will affect our long term future, and how it affects the probability of other x-risks. So if I assessed it on population loss I might have to add other factors, and it might bit out of the scope of what I'm going for with the post. The severity estimates are fairly open to interpretation as I've done them, and I think that's fine for this, which is an introduction/overview of cosmic threats.
Thanks for the feedback :)
Those is cool! Not a big deal but wondering why you listed worst case scenario as only 7 out of 10 for alien microbes. Why could they not wipe us out?
Microbes on mars would have adapted to a very different environment. Most viruses affect only a very small subset of the animal kingdom, so it would be strange for a martian virus to suddenly be more dangerous than the worst mammal viruses ever encountered.
Yeah basically that was my reasoning. I'm super sceptical about this risk. The virus may destroy one ecosystem in an extreme environment or be a very effective pathogen in specific circumstances but would be unlikely to be a pervasive threat.
This theoretical microbe would have invested so many stat points in adaptations like extreme UV radiation resistance, resistance to toxins in Mars soil like perchlorates and H2O2, and totally unseen levels of desiccation, salinity, and ionic strength resistance that would be useless on Earth. And it would have to power all of these useless abilities on a food source that it is likely not suited to metabolising, and definitely not under the conditions it is used to. I just can't imagine how it would be a huge threat around the World. But in a worst case scenario, it could kill a lot of people or damage an ecosystem we rely on heavily with massive global implications, so 7/10.
That might be true but have you not seen the movie "war of the worlds" ? Or read that book by the guy who wrote "the martian" about the light eating organisms?
In all seriousness that makes s lot of sense to me, but I thought there still might be a non -zero chance of a different kind of pathogen (perhaps that doesn't fit our earthly paradigms) that could just wipe us out.
Millions of "fission bugs" that enter you then explode, or a rapidly reproducing carbon eating parasite or a..
I know this example doesn't match because they still do have roughly the same environment, but introduced species can take over another more rapidly grab in their own where they are in equilibrium. What if we didn't have that one critical defense mechanism that every creature on Jupiter's moon uses routinely to keep it at bay?
IDK probably just being ridiculous here.
Great post! I think cosmic threats are definitely worth learning more about.
Only one thing bugged me. When you say the heat death of the universe is "the 3rd law of thermodynamics", it confused me because there's already a 3rd law of thermodynamics and, as far as I know, it has little to do with heat death.
Ah yes good spot thank you! I got the wrong law of thermodynamics S:
I have corrected this in the post
This is a great post, strong upvote.
I am confused about your description who "handles" what. Especially for threats that move at the speed of light (solar flares, super flares, super nova explosions, gamma ray blasts, quasar ignition &c), it seems like the only option is increasing civilizational robustness, right? Additionally, you say that for rogue celestial bodies, "Managing this threat is futile", which is true at the current level of technology, but if we had the energy of our sun available, surely we could redirect the path of such an object if detected early enough?
The only threat that looks like it truly falls into the category "unmanageable" is false vacuum decay, except maybe by interspersing as much as possible in the reachable universe, and avoiding destabilising fundamental physics experiments (though, ah, fictional evidence).
I don't think there's anything we can do right now about rogue celestial bodies - so not worth thinking about for me.
For space weather stuff like solar flares, the main jobs are proofing technology against high amounts of radiation, especially when it comes to nuclear reactors and national defence infrastructure. Researching exactly what the impacts might be from different threats, and their probabilities, would definitely help governments defend against these threats more effectively.
but if we had the energy of our sun available, surely we could redirect the path of such an object if detected early enough?
Momentum is the limiting factor. Even redirecting all of the sun's light in the same direction only gets you about of force. That's enough to accelerate a solar mass by a whopping , so you're going to need to see it coming millions of years out. Doing better than that would require somehow ejecting a significant amount of reaction mass from the solar system.
The story I know is that if you can change the course of such an object by a slight amount early enough, that should be sufficient to cause significant deviations late in its course. Am I mistaken about this, and the force is not strong enough because the deviation is far too small?
For a freely moving mass, yes, though "early enough" can be arbitrarily early depending on how much impulse you have to work with. But stars in a galaxy aren't freely moving. They're on highly chaotic trajectories, with characteristic timescales on the order of (very roughly) ~1MYr.
Executive summary: This post provides an exhaustive list of cosmic threats that could pose existential risks to humanity, analyzing the severity and probability of each.
Key points:
This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.
Minor nitpick: "NEOs (objects smaller than asteroids)"
The definition of NEOs here seems wrong. Wouldn't it be more accurate to call them "Tiny NEOs?" The current definition makes it sound as if asteroids aren't NEOs, but most NEOs are asteroids.
Good point I have edited the post. Lazy writing on my part. Thank you!
Note (10/2025): I now believe this post is not very exhaustive. I've listed 100 cosmic threats here, but this post still serves as a good introduction to the most salient cosmic threats. I might update it in the future to include all 100 but I'm not sure its worth it for the 2 people who will read it.
Toby Ord covers 'Asteroids and Comets' and 'Stellar Explosions' in The Precipice. But I thought it would be useful to provide an up-to-date and exhaustive list of all cosmic threats. I'm defining cosmic threat here as any existential risk potentially arising from space. I think this list may be useful for 3 main reasons:
I will list each cosmic threat, provide a brief explanation, and find the best evidence I can to provide severity and probability estimates for each. Enjoy :)
I'll use this format:
Cosmic Threat [Severity of worst case scenario /10] [Probability of a scenario as bad as that occurring in the next 100 years] Explanation of threat
For the severity, 10 is the extinction of all intelligent life on Earth, and 0 is a fart in the wind. It was difficult to pin down one number for threats with multiple outcomes (e.g. asteroids have different sizes). So the severity estimates are for the worst-case scenarios for each cosmic threat, and the probability estimate corresponds to an event occurring that is as severe as that scenario.
Probabilities are presented as % chance of a worst case scenario-type event occurring in the next 100 years. I have taken probabilities from the literature and converted values to normalise them as a probability of their occurrence within the next 100 years (as a %). This isn't a perfect way to do it, but I prioritised getting a general understanding of their probability, rather than numbers that are hard to imagine. When the severity or likelihood is unclear or not researched well enough, I've written 'unknown'.
I'm trying my best to ignore reasoning along the lines of "if it hasn't happened before, then it very likely won't happen ever or is extremely rare" because of the anthropic principle. Our view of past events on Earth is biased towards a world that has allowed humanity to evolve, which likely required a few billion years of stable-ish conditions. So it is likely that we have just been lucky in the past, where no cosmic threats have disturbed Earth's habitability so extremely as to set back life's evolution by billions of years (not even the worst mass extinction ever at the Permian-Triassic boundary did this, as reptiles survived).
Format:
Cosmic Threat [Severity of worst case scenario /10] [Probability of a scenario as bad as that occurring in the next 100 years] Explanation of threat
Solar flares [4/10] [1%]. Electromagnetic radiation erupts from the surface of the sun. Solar flares occur fairly regularly and cause minor impacts, mainly on communications. A large solar flare has the potential to cause electrical grids to fail, damage satellites, disrupt radio signals, cause increased radiation influx, destroy data storage devices, cause navigation errors, and permanently damage scientific equipment. This threat is mainly managed by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) and COSPAR.
Super flares [8/10] [0.1%-0.16%] Super flares could lead to changes to Earth's surface temperature and the destruction of our ozone layer, but the predicted effects are still unknown. Some predict that space weather events like these have the potential to cause the extinction of many species and severe destruction to technology and global infrastructure. Resulting failures in nuclear threat detection or global panic could trigger x-risks. This threat is mainly managed by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) and COSPAR.
Supernova explosions [8/10] [0.001%]. According to this study, the closest stars that could pose a threat to humanity if they went supernova are IK Pegasi and Betelgeuse, but they are not expected to go supernova until 1.9 billion years and several million years, respectively. However, no systematic survey of all white dwarf stars (e.g. using GAIA data) has been conducted, and there may be others (I've adjusted the probability estimate based on that lack of research). The impact of a supernova explosion would be quite devastating to life on Earth, primarily due to damage to our ozone layer. This threat is mainly managed by ESAC in theory.
Gamma-ray blasts [7/10] [0.000005%]. Gamma-ray bursts are more powerful than supernova explosions, and could potentially generate nitrogen oxides, which could rip large holes in our ozone layer. This could leave Earth exposed to UV rays for many years. This threat is mainly managed by ESAC.
Asteroid Impacts [10/10] [0.02%]. This has happened many times in Earth's past. Space missions such as DART, Hera, and NEOWISE reduce this probability as we are fairly well prepared to deflect asteroids. We have evidence that asteroids have the potential to cause extinction events through direct impact destruction, tsunamis, and giant ash clouds that block out the sun. This threat is mainly managed by SMPAG and IAWN.
Other Near-Earth Objects (NEOs) [6/10] [a: 0.003% b: 0.06%]. Other near-Earth objects (not necessarily asteroids - there are many smaller objects in the Solar System) smashing into Earth are probably quite common, we can tell from all the craters on the moon. Probability 'a' is the probability that an asteroid impacts and kills more than 1 million people. Probability 'b' is the probability that an asteroid hits and forms a crater larger than 1km in diameter. This threat is mainly managed by SMPAG and IAWN.
Conflict with intelligent alien life [10/10] [unknown]. Intelligent life exists on Earth, so it's possible it could exist elsewhere. Hopefully, they don't invade and kill us all. No one manages this threat seriously, the closest thing is SETI.
Alien Technology [10/10] [unknown]. Conflict with alien technology is slightly more likely than direct conflict with intelligent alien life. Self-replicating robots may have been sent out throughout the galaxy, consuming the resources of a planet, replicating themselves, and moving on. This is theoretically possible, and the universe is a very large place. No one manages this threat seriously, the closest thing is SETI.
Rogue Celestial Bodies [10/10] [0.002%]. Rogue celestial bodies include black holes, planets, and stars that are not gravitationally bound but wander around the galaxy. One of these celestial bodies could potentially enter our Solar System. There are many exciting possibilities from this point.. Earth could be knocked out of its orbit, sending us hurtling through open space. Another planet (or planetoid) could impact us (this has happened before and the ejecta formed the moon). Or if the rogue celestial body is exotic, we could be swallowed up by a black hole or burnt to a crisp by a second sun. Managing this threat is futile.
Vacuum decay [10/10] [unknown]. Vacuum decay is a hypothetical scenario in which a more stable vacuum state exists than our current "false vacuum". A bubble of this true vacuum could form somewhere in the universe or in a high-energy particle accelerator. To quote Nick Bostrom, "This would result in an expanding bubble of total destruction that would sweep through the galaxy and beyond at the speed of light, tearing all matter apart as it proceeds.". Incredibly speculative, no one manages this threat from a cosmic perspective as far as I'm aware.
Magnetar flares [9/10] [unknown]. Similar to solar flares and gamma-ray bursts, except with less research into the probability of their occurrence. A magnetar is a neutron star with an extremely powerful magnetic field. It sends out high-energy electromagnetic radiation, like X-rays and gamma rays. This threat is mainly managed by ESAC in theory.
Alien Microbes [7/10] [<0.0001%]. Some have considered cancelling NASA and ESA's Mars Sample Return mission due to concerns about biosecurity. Termed back contamination in astrobiology (as opposed to forward contamination where we contaminate Mars samples with life from Earth), the idea is that bringing back extremely hardy life from Mars could either cause a pandemic or introduce a species capable of outcompeting microbes on Earth, undercutting ecosystems. This threat is managed by COSPAR and CETEX.
Pulsar beams [9/10] [unknown]. "A pulsar (from pulsating radio source) is a highly magnetized rotating neutron star that emits beams of electromagnetic radiation out of its magnetic poles." Pulsar beams hit Earth frequently and don't cause much harm, but if a pulsar were to be very close to us, it could wipe out our ozone layer and expose us to the radiation of space - it wouldn't be pretty. This threat is mainly managed by ESAC in theory.
Quasar ignition [10/10] [unknown]. Quasars form around black holes. "The inflow of gas into the black hole releases a tremendous amount of energy, and a quasar is born. The power output of the quasar dwarfs that of the surrounding galaxy and expels gas from the galaxy in what has been termed a galactic superwind" This "superwind" drives all gas away from the inner galaxy, and would certainly rip off our atmosphere, leaving us totally exposed. This threat is mainly managed by ESAC in theory.
Cosmic Rays from Galactic Core Explosions [10/10] [unknown]. Hundreds of thousands of times more damaging than supernova explosions, these cosmic rays originate from the cores of galaxies. Some theorise that cosmic rays from other galaxies have already caused mass extinctions on Earth. Explosions from the core of the Milky Way likely make the inner galaxy uninhabitable, so large explosions may have catastrophic impacts on Earth. This threat is mainly managed by ESAC in theory.
Some artificial existential risks from space..
Asteroid Orbit Interference [10/10]. In the event that humanity colonises the solar system or establishes significant space resource operations, it will become a lot easier to alter asteroid orbits. An asteroid orbit may accidentally be placed on a collision path with Earth through by messing up stable gravitational interactions by alteration or destruction of other asteroids, or by accidental collisions of resource extraction equipment and asteroids. An asteroid may also be re-directed towards Earth on purpose as an act of war. No international policy framework exists to govern space resource activities - these risks would most likely be handled by UNOOSA and national governments.
Alien generation [10/10]. By colonising other planets, we generate additional societies in our solar system. These societies would live under very different conditions to us, so many diverge significantly in culture, religion, and potentially even biology. Additionally, due to the time delay in contacting these societies and distance, live communication would be impossible and determination of their war potential would be much harder than other societies on Earth. These factors increase the probability of conflict, so good governance is extremely important to make sure they don't start hurtling asteroids at us.
and finally, some honourable mentions...
The heat death of the universe [10/10] [0%]. It's worth the inclusion as the heat death of the universe will eventually destroy everything. It's an inevitable outcome of the application of the first two laws of thermodynamics - entropy increases in an isolated system. So eventually the universe will reach a point where all energy is evenly distributed and not a lot will happen - certainly not life.
The increasing luminosity of the sun [10/10] [0%]. The sun's luminosity is increasing over time. In ~1 billion years the luminosity will be so high that the oceans will boil away and the Earth will no longer be habitable. Hopefully we'll be intergalactic by then!
Other unknown risks [unknown] [unknown]. The space (& physics) community is essentially discovering a new existential threat every few years, and we are likely to discover more. For example, we know very little about dark energy or how common life is in our universe. Most threats are extremely low probability, but maybe the next one won't be.
If you have any feedback, edits, suggestions, or additions to the list, please comment or pm me.
Acknowledgements: I extend my gratitude to Matt Allcock and Darryl Wright for their invaluable discussions and insights on these topics, which significantly contributed to the accuracy and direction of my research.
I am currently looking to work on cosmic threats so this is a very useful read!
Just a note that depending on the outcome of the crisis of cosmology, the Universe might collapse on itself, instead of the heat death. Nothing is certain at this point!