EA Forum Bot Site
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
Answer by Ben_Harack7
0
0

Motivation: Find a way to remind yourself about what you care about (and if needed, why you care about it). This could manifest in any way that works for your. A post-it could be useful. A calendar notification. A standing meeting with colleagues where you do a moment of reflection (a technique that I've seen used to great effect at the Human Diagnosis Project). A list of recitations embedded among TODO list items (my personal technique). 

Reply
3
Hauke Hillebrandt
Can you share that list?
Ben_Harack7
0
0

Most of these are pithy statements that serve as reminders of much more complicated and nuanced ideas. This is a mix of recitation types, only some of which are explicitly related to motivation. I've summarized, rephrased, and expanded most of these for clarity, and cut entire sections that are too esoteric. Also, something I'd love to try, but haven't, is putting some of these into a spaced repetition practice (I use Anki), since I've heard surprisingly positive things about how well that works.

  1. Be ruthlessly efficient today
  2. <Specific reminder about a ha
... (read more)
Reply
See in context
by Linch
1 min read5 answers 0

27

Independent researchPersonal developmentResearch methods
Personal Blog

See companion question here.

As a researcher in a nonprofit, I often have trouble focusing and executing on the most important tasks. I think a bunch of things help about being in a org helps: ops support, having a manager and others to source contracts for research problems that are relevant for improving specific EA decisions, weekly checkins with a manager, collaboratively set milestones, daily slack updates, having a slack where I share ideas, reviews of my early drafts and other docs by coworkers, having coworkers to challenge and debate theories of change, and I'm sure a number of other things I'm missing. 

Presumably both I individually and my org institutionally are still falling far short of what we can do, but it seems like being in an institution is helpful for me. And of course not everybody benefits from being in an institution, and I'm sure many people are much more productive without one. 

So I'm broadly interested in how independent researchers (or semi-independent researchers like grad students with very absentee advisors) manage to maintain (or get higher) on things like motivation, general productivity, and setting really good/impactful research goals.

27

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Mentioned in
New Answer
New Comment


5 Answers sorted by
Top

Ben_Harack

7
0
0

Prioritize ruthlessly. Very few ideas can even be examined, let alone pursued.

Ben_Harack

7
0
0

Productivity + meta: Learn to be an effective Red Team, and use this ability on your own ideas and plans. 

Ben_Harack

7
0
0

Motivation: Find a way to remind yourself about what you care about (and if needed, why you care about it). This could manifest in any way that works for your. A post-it could be useful. A calendar notification. A standing meeting with colleagues where you do a moment of reflection (a technique that I've seen used to great effect at the Human Diagnosis Project). A list of recitations embedded among TODO list items (my personal technique). 

Hauke Hillebrandt3
0
0

Can you share that list?

Reply
7
Ben_Harack
Most of these are pithy statements that serve as reminders of much more complicated and nuanced ideas. This is a mix of recitation types, only some of which are explicitly related to motivation. I've summarized, rephrased, and expanded most of these for clarity, and cut entire sections that are too esoteric. Also, something I'd love to try, but haven't, is putting some of these into a spaced repetition practice (I use Anki), since I've heard surprisingly positive things about how well that works. 1. Be ruthlessly efficient today 2. <Specific reminder about a habit that I'm seeking to break> 3. Brainstorm, then execute 4. If you don't have a plan for it, it isn't going to happen. 5. A long list of things that you want to do is no excuse for not doing any of them. 6. Make an extraordinary effort. 7. <Reminders about particular physical/emotional needs that are not adequately covered by existing habits> 8. Remember the spheres of control: Total control. Some control. No control. For more info, see here: https://www.precisionnutrition.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Sphere-of-control-FF.pdf 9. Every problem is an opportunity 10. What you do today is important because you are exchanging a day of your life for it. (might be from Heartsill Wilson) 11. Think about what isn't being said, but needs to be. 12. Get results 13. Life is finite; pursue your cares. 14. The opposite of play is not work. The opposite of play is depression. (paraphrased from Simon Sutton-Smith) 15. Move gently 16. Weighted version of "shortest processing time" scheduling algorithm is close to optimal on all metrics. (from "Algorithms to live by") 17. Exponential backoff for relationships: finite investment, infinite patience. (from "Algorithms to live by") 18. Doing things right vs doing the right thing. 19. 10-10-10. (Reference to the technique of thinking about how a decision would be viewed 10 minutes, 10 months, and 10 years in the future. Modify at your discretion.) 2

Ben_Harack

7
0
0

Allocate some time to "meta", like studying habit formation and self-management. For starters I might recommend Atomic Habits and some of Cal Newport's work.

Jack R

6
0
0

I'm not an independent researcher, so this advice is probably less trustworthy than others', but I am currently on somewhat of an independent research stint to work on ELK, and have been annoyed at motivation being hard to conjure sometimes. 

I've been thinking about what causes motivation (e.g. thinking about various anecdata in my life) and I've also just begun tracking my time practically to the minute in the hope of this causing me to reflect on the sequence of stimuli, actions, and feelings I have throughout the day/week such that I can deduce any tractable levers on my own motivation. Though it seems too early to tell whether the time tracking will be fruitful in the end -- we will see.

An example of how "reflecting on the sequence of stimuli, actions, and feeling" could be helpful: today, I hypothesized that I was much more productive on two recent plane rides than I am usually due to being away from people and being action/motion restricted. And so I tried getting on a train; though I noticed I didn't want to work on ELK due to being anxious and hypothesized that perhaps my brain still wanted to pay attention to things I had been doing before getting on the train, and that, maybe, an additional reason I am productive on planes is due to security lines giving me time to reset my brain; I then tried resting for 20 minutes, to see if my anxiety would go away; unfortunately it didn't, though I then went on to think of more testable hypotheses and decided to lower my caffeine dosage [I had had about 120mg that morning, and caffeine seems to cause anxiety]).

 

More from Linch
109
My "infohazards small working group" Signal Chat may have encountered minor leaks
Linch
· · 6m read
2
2
287
[April Fools' Day] Introducing Open Asteroid Impact
2 authors
· · 1m read
13
13
89
A Qualitative Case for LTFF: Filling Critical Ecosystem Gaps
Linch
· · 11m read
26
26
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
[Cross-posted from my Substack here] If you spend time with people trying to change the world, you’ll come to an interesting conundrum: Various advocacy groups reference previous successful social movements as to why their chosen strategy is the most important one. Yet, these groups often follow wildly different strategies from each other to achieve social change. So, which one of them is right? The answer is all of them and none of them. This is because many people use research and historical movements to justify their pre-existing beliefs about how social change happens. Simply, you can find a case study to fit most plausible theories of how social change happens. For example, the groups might say: * Repeated nonviolent disruption is the key to social change, citing the Freedom Riders from the civil rights Movement or Act Up! from the gay rights movement. * Technological progress is what drives improvements in the human condition if you consider the development of the contraceptive pill funded by Katharine McCormick. * Organising and base-building is how change happens, as inspired by Ella Baker, the NAACP or Cesar Chavez from the United Workers Movement. * Insider advocacy is the real secret of social movements – look no further than how influential the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights was in passing the Civil Rights Acts of 1960 & 1964. * Democratic participation is the backbone of social change – just look at how Ireland lifted a ban on abortion via a Citizen’s Assembly. * And so on… To paint this picture, we can see this in action below: Source: Just Stop Oil which focuses on…civil resistance and disruption Source: The Civic Power Fund which focuses on… local organising What do we take away from all this? In my mind, a few key things: 1. Many different approaches have worked in changing the world so we should be humble and not assume we are doing The Most Important Thing 2. The case studies we focus on are likely confirmation bias, where
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Although some of the jokes are inevitably tasteless, and Zorrilla is used to set up punchlines, I enjoyed it and it will surely increase concerns and donations for shrimp. I'm not sure what impression the audience will have of EA in general.  Last week The Daily Show interviewed Rutger Bregman about his new book Moral Ambition (which includes a profile of Zorrilla and SWP). 
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
Americans, we need your help to stop a dangerous AI bill from passing the Senate. What’s going on? * The House Energy & Commerce Committee included a provision in its reconciliation bill that would ban AI regulation by state and local governments for the next 10 years. * Several states have led the way in AI regulation while Congress has dragged its heels. * Stopping state governments from regulating AI might be okay, if we could trust Congress to meaningfully regulate it instead. But we can’t. This provision would destroy state leadership on AI and pass the responsibility to a Congress that has shown little interest in seriously preventing AI danger. * If this provision passes the Senate, we could see a DECADE of inaction on AI. * This provision also violates the Byrd Rule, a Senate rule which is meant to prevent non-budget items from being included in the reconciliation bill.   What can I do? Here are 3 things you can do TODAY, in order of priority: 1. (5 minutes) Call and email both of your Senators. Tell them you oppose AI preemption, and ask them to raise a point of order that preempting state AI regulation violates the Byrd Rule. * Find your Senators here. * Here’s an example of a call:  “Hello, my name is {YOUR NAME} and I’m a resident of {YOUR STATE}. The newest budget reconciliation bill includes a 10-year ban pre-empting state AI legislation without establishing any federal guardrails. This is extremely concerning to me – leading experts warn us that AI could cause mass harm within the next few years, but this provision would prevent states from protecting their citizens from AI crises for the next decade. It also violates the Byrd Rule, since preempting state AI regulation doesn’t impact federal taxes or spending. I’d like the Senator to speak out against this provision and raise a point of order that this provision should not be included under the Byrd Rule.” See here for sample call + email temp
Relevant opportunities
137
[urgent] Americans: call your Senators and tell them you oppose AI preemption
2 authors
· · 2m read
16
16
107
$100,000 bounty for finding >$1M in legal and collaborative corporate donation matching opportunities
3 authors
· · 4m read
3
3
11
EA Organization Updates: May 2025
2 authors
· · 9m read
0
0
View more