Hide table of contents

Loom is a desktop tool and chrome extension for screen capture and audio/video recording app with easy sharing features.

It's worth noting: Loom is probably the tool here I'm most excited about! I used it a lot during this project (to make all the videos, and to talk to Chana), and I think basically everybody who's doing video or text messaging in a professional capacity should consider using Loom. It's very straightforward, and it just works. 

When can Loom be Useful?

Other Tutorials

Loom have a 'getting started' page which has (unsurprisingly) good video introductions, but leans sales-pitch-y. The tool is quite intuitive, so it would also be reasonable to just download and start using it to get maybe 70% of the value.

Text Tutorial

Loom is available as a desktop app or chrome extension.  The key interface has a number of recording settings; you can use loom to record your screen (full screen or a specific window), video, and audio.

Once you start recording, this interface will disappear and loom will become a smaller interface at the left of your screen. If you hover over each button a keyboard shortcut for that command will show. 

When you click 'stop recording', loom automatically opens a webpage with your video on it. By default, loom plays videos at 1.2x speed. 

Note that some features (videos >5min, screen drawing) require an $8/mo subscription. 

Examples

Personal Experience

I found loom really useful as a tool, and I can see myself using it a lot when I'm trying to explain things quickly, remotely, & asynchronously; I used it during this project to communicate with colleagues!

It's pretty intuitive, and the workflow is very smooth. It's mildly irritating that you can't (so far as I could spot) make videos save locally by default, and therefore need an active internet connection to record. It's also worth noting that the automated transcriber is pretty good, and it's easy to correct; I recommend people use them if they have any trouble hearing.

It's also easy to download videos and upload them to youtube, as was done for the above video.

Try it Yourself!

Take something you've written recently (e.g. a forum post, a long message to a colleague) & try recording a loom summary of it. Alternatively, you could explain how to use something on a computer (an excel function, an app you think is neat, etc.). Share your experience of using Loom in the comments and (if appropriate) link to your video!

 

Join us at 6pm GMT today in the EA GatherTown to discuss Loom and do a short activity together!

 

Tomorrow, I'll be discussing Excalidraw, a drawing tool. The event for Excalidraw will be 6pm, Monday the 30th

Comments6


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

FWWIW, I do something similar for free using zoom -- I start a zoom meeting, share my screen and record the meeting (with just me in it). The resulting video is my face in the corner and my screen. Not as many features as Loom obviously, but free. 

Smart! I think loom is also free (for now) if you don't use it to host videos, and I personally find it more convenient (I use the browser extension, I like that you can easily select a rectangle to record)

fyi, it looks like the free version is limited to "25 videos / user", unless you sign up with a school email address (as part of their "Loom for educators" program). Otherwise, subscriptions look to be $15/mo (or $12.50/mo when billed annually).

Looks like a useful service though, thanks for sharing!

Thank you for pointing that out! Worth noting  that's a limit on the videos you can have stored on their servers at once; if you want to download & delete them from the servers you can record as many as you like.

Good to know, thanks!

Another totally free alternative is OBS studio, though it's possibly more featureful and less user-friendly than Loom

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 16m read
 · 
At the last EAG Bay Area, I gave a workshop on navigating a difficult job market, which I repeated days ago at EAG London. A few people have asked for my notes and slides, so I’ve decided to share them here.  This is the slide deck I used.   Below is a low-effort loose transcript, minus the interactive bits (you can see these on the slides in the form of reflection and discussion prompts with a timer). In my opinion, some interactive elements were rushed because I stubbornly wanted to pack too much into the session. If you’re going to re-use them, I recommend you allow for more time than I did if you can (and if you can’t, I empathise with the struggle of making difficult trade-offs due to time constraints).  One of the benefits of written communication over spoken communication is that you can be very precise and comprehensive. I’m sorry that those benefits are wasted on this post. Ideally, I’d have turned my speaker notes from the session into a more nuanced written post that would include a hundred extra points that I wanted to make and caveats that I wanted to add. Unfortunately, I’m a busy person, and I’ve come to accept that such a post will never exist. So I’m sharing this instead as a MVP that I believe can still be valuable –certainly more valuable than nothing!  Introduction 80,000 Hours’ whole thing is asking: Have you considered using your career to have an impact? As an advisor, I now speak with lots of people who have indeed considered it and very much want it – they don't need persuading. What they need is help navigating a tough job market. I want to use this session to spread some messages I keep repeating in these calls and create common knowledge about the job landscape.  But first, a couple of caveats: 1. Oh my, I wonder if volunteering to run this session was a terrible idea. Giving advice to one person is difficult; giving advice to many people simultaneously is impossible. You all have different skill sets, are at different points in
 ·  · 47m read
 · 
Thank you to Arepo and Eli Lifland for looking over this article for errors.  I am sorry that this article is so long. Every time I thought I was done with it I ran into more issues with the model, and I wanted to be as thorough as I could. I’m not going to blame anyone for skimming parts of this article.  Note that the majority of this article was written before Eli’s updated model was released (the site was updated june 8th). His new model improves on some of my objections, but the majority still stand.   Introduction: AI 2027 is an article written by the “AI futures team”. The primary piece is a short story penned by Scott Alexander, depicting a month by month scenario of a near-future where AI becomes superintelligent in 2027,proceeding to automate the entire economy in only a year or two and then either kills us all or does not kill us all, depending on government policies.  What makes AI 2027 different from other similar short stories is that it is presented as a forecast based on rigorous modelling and data analysis from forecasting experts. It is accompanied by five appendices of “detailed research supporting these predictions” and a codebase for simulations. They state that “hundreds” of people reviewed the text, including AI expert Yoshua Bengio, although some of these reviewers only saw bits of it. The scenario in the short story is not the median forecast for any AI futures author, and none of the AI2027 authors actually believe that 2027 is the median year for a singularity to happen. But the argument they make is that 2027 is a plausible year, and they back it up with images of sophisticated looking modelling like the following: This combination of compelling short story and seemingly-rigorous research may have been the secret sauce that let the article to go viral and be treated as a serious project:To quote the authors themselves: It’s been a crazy few weeks here at the AI Futures Project. Almost a million people visited our webpage; 166,00
 ·  · 32m read
 · 
Authors: Joel McGuire (analysis, drafts) and Lily Ottinger (editing)  Formosa: Fulcrum of the Future? An invasion of Taiwan is uncomfortably likely and potentially catastrophic. We should research better ways to avoid it.   TLDR: I forecast that an invasion of Taiwan increases all the anthropogenic risks by ~1.5% (percentage points) of a catastrophe killing 10% or more of the population by 2100 (nuclear risk by 0.9%, AI + Biorisk by 0.6%). This would imply it constitutes a sizable share of the total catastrophic risk burden expected over the rest of this century by skilled and knowledgeable forecasters (8% of the total risk of 20% according to domain experts and 17% of the total risk of 9% according to superforecasters). I think this means that we should research ways to cost-effectively decrease the likelihood that China invades Taiwan. This could mean exploring the prospect of advocating that Taiwan increase its deterrence by investing in cheap but lethal weapons platforms like mines, first-person view drones, or signaling that mobilized reserves would resist an invasion. Disclaimer I read about and forecast on topics related to conflict as a hobby (4th out of 3,909 on the Metaculus Ukraine conflict forecasting competition, 73 out of 42,326 in general on Metaculus), but I claim no expertise on the topic. I probably spent something like ~40 hours on this over the course of a few months. Some of the numbers I use may be slightly outdated, but this is one of those things that if I kept fiddling with it I'd never publish it.  Acknowledgements: I heartily thank Lily Ottinger, Jeremy Garrison, Maggie Moss and my sister for providing valuable feedback on previous drafts. Part 0: Background The Chinese Civil War (1927–1949) ended with the victorious communists establishing the People's Republic of China (PRC) on the mainland. The defeated Kuomintang (KMT[1]) retreated to Taiwan in 1949 and formed the Republic of China (ROC). A dictatorship during the cold war, T