This is a special post for quick takes by Devon Fritz 🔸. Only they can create top-level comments. Comments here also appear on the Quick Takes page and All Posts page.
EA is (again) having a moment:
- Twitter is all in a buzz about it, arguing about insect lives being worth more than human lives
- It is the cover of The Economist with the headline "The century’s biggest idea"
- The US Defense Department tweeted "Americanism, not effective altruism"
- ...and so on.
The usual suspects are in the trenches fighting the good fight, but this is a great time for EAs to take some comms action. An example I particularly loved was @Andres Jimenez Zorrilla 🔸 's post on LinkedIn and Twitter: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/andres-jimenez-zorrilla_im-a-longtime-effective-altruist-and-the-share-7512717228480413696-7Y_k/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAINuQ8BRM6_FTbj8vR-viYZrP0S2TPoUEg
This is the sort of collective action problem that EAs think is some other EA's responsibility and comms isn't our traditional strong suit, but I'd love to see more EAs in the arena here, posting about their experiences, posting their arguments, or talking to friends and family about why these ideas matter.
Yeah, let's hope this moment goes better than the last one. Personally, I think it's exciting and that we need to be preparing for what's likely to come. I've seen lots of EAs saying the Economist's article is unfair/a hit job, but it was pretty flattering and positive, so if you think that's a hit job...
I agree people should be out there telling their story, if they can, not adopting a bunker mentality. I am/will be going various bits.
Got the same reaction. The Economist considers EA the "biggest idea of the century" but for some people that is still not flattering enough. How greedy can you be...
I broadly agree with you both but there's a nuance. There are a different articles:
- The article from the cover. Largely positive and agree with both of you that we could hardly expect to be treated better and this is the one on the cover that most people will read by default. I'm also grateful for Will's reply defending weirdness.
- Then there's the mirror life article. I haven't read it but from what I hear, quite positive
Then there's the conquering the world article. I think this one has the intention of "presenting both sides" and I largely disagree with the way that it presents EA even if it is very far from being a hit piece
Overall, I think this issue of The Economist is positive for EA but still encourage people to speak up about the things they disagree with from the articles. Disclaimer: I have, so I'm probably biased.
I do think CEA has a special role here to coordinate and lead - as the safeguard of the EA brand and crucial community builder. I would love a Slack channel where key comms people from EA orgs can coordinate on things like this :) Maybe this already exists, and I am out of the loop?
EA is (again) having a moment:
The usual suspects are in the trenches fighting the good fight, but this is a great time for EAs to take some comms action. An example I particularly loved was @Andres Jimenez Zorrilla 🔸 's post on LinkedIn and Twitter: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/andres-jimenez-zorrilla_im-a-longtime-effective-altruist-and-the-share-7512717228480413696-7Y_k/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAINuQ8BRM6_FTbj8vR-viYZrP0S2TPoUEg
This is the sort of collective action problem that EAs think is some other EA's responsibility and comms isn't our traditional strong suit, but I'd love to see more EAs in the arena here, posting about their experiences, posting their arguments, or talking to friends and family about why these ideas matter.
I broadly agree with you both but there's a nuance. There are a different articles:
- The article from the cover. Largely positive and agree with both of you that we could hardly expect to be treated better and this is the one on the cover that most people will read by default. I'm also grateful for Will's reply defending weirdness.
- Then there's the mirror life article. I haven't read it but from what I hear, quite positive
... (read more)Then there's the conquering the world article. I think this one has the intention of "presenting both sides" and I largely disagree with