Perhaps not entirely EA but I came across this post that’s potentially interesting and disturbing of a statistician casting scepticism on the evidence that convicted Lucy Letby and I wondered if any rationalists could assess its claim. Potentially touches on weaknesses in the justice system regarding medical evidence and how’s it’s weighed up. https://gill1109.com/2023/05/24/the-lucy-letby-case/?amp=1
I think for reading around this it should be considered that it’s a recurrent problem and the root of sexual liberalism should be considered at fault. The Case Against the Sexual Revolution by Louise Perry is a good example.
Perhaps not entirely EA but I came across this post that’s potentially interesting and disturbing of a statistician casting scepticism on the evidence that convicted Lucy Letby and I wondered if any rationalists could assess its claim. Potentially touches on weaknesses in the justice system regarding medical evidence and how’s it’s weighed up. https://gill1109.com/2023/05/24/the-lucy-letby-case/?amp=1
I think for reading around this it should be considered that it’s a recurrent problem and the root of sexual liberalism should be considered at fault. The Case Against the Sexual Revolution by Louise Perry is a good example.