JP Addison🔸

5758 karmaJoined Working (6-15 years)Cambridge, MA, USA
jpaddison.net

Bio

Head of the CEA Online Team, which runs this Forum.

A bit about me, to help you get to know me: Prior to CEA, I was a data engineer at an aerospace startup. I got into EA through reading the entire archive of Slate Star Codex in 2015. I found EA naturally compelling, and donated to AMF, then GFI, before settling on my current cause prioritization of meta-EA, with AI x-risk as my object-level preference. I try to have a wholehearted approach to morality, rather than thinking of it as an obligation or opportunity. You see my LessWrong profile here.

I love this Forum a bunch. I've been working on it for 5 years as of this writing, and founded the EA Forum 2.0. (Remember 1.0?) I have an intellectual belief in it as an impactful project, but also a deep love for it as an open platform where anyone can come participate in the project of effective altruism. We're open 24/7, anywhere there is an internet connection.

In my personal life, I hang out in the Boston EA and Gaymer communities, enjoy houseplants, table tennis, and playing coop games with my partner, who has more karma than me.

Posts
48

Sorted by New
61
· · 6m read

Comments
696

Topic contributions
17

Fair, I was probably too loose there. I believe specifically that posts which were copied from google docs[1] failed to wrap at the screen width. But I wasn't a much of a mobile reader at the time.

Also thank you! I didn't realize you were the one who added mobile support.

  1. ^

    IIRC, maybe it was some other cause that affected a subset of posts

I like the branching tree metaphor, and I like the attempt to framework these intro conversations — good post.

Thanks, Lizka. I think this is one of the best retirement presents I could have gotten.

Nice, I like this. Have you considered crossposting the full content? Usually those get a lot more people reading them, and more visibility, though do note the CC-BY restriction.

Good ideas, thank you!

JP Addison🔸
Moderator Comment2
2
4
1

We're issuing @NobodyInteresting a warning for the above comment. The comment does not meet the expectations for civility and engaging in good faith. I would not recommend a public warning for this comment on it's own (though I would downvote it for the above reasons, and recommend a discrete DM), but we have less tolerance for users who have not yet shown that they can engage productively.

I think this is a good and useful point. And one that's underappreciated in general.

I expect that "labs" usefully communicates to most of my interlocutors that I'm talking about the companies developing frontier models and not something like Palantir. There's a lot of hype-based incentive for companies to claim to be "AI companies", which creates confusion. (Indeed, I didn't know before I chose Palantir as an example, but of course they're marketing themselves as an AI company.)

—

That said, I agree with the consideration in your post. I don't claim which is the bigger consideration, only that they trade off.

Load more