Hide table of contents

I had the privilege of attending Stuart Russell’s annual IASEAI (pronounced as 'eye-see-eye') conference on 2025 February 6-7, in Paris, France. The conference was, in many ways, great: it brought together people from the AI Safety and Ethics communities, it provided an opportunity for people from various backgrounds to participate, it had a prestigious venue, and it had a smooth attendee experience overall. 

This post is not about these great qualities, it’s about the two things it missed out on. Here are my experiences and reflections for conferences in general. 

Subscribe to the Fieldbuilding Blog

On networking

 

In short, the conference didn’t do a good job of facilitating networking, which, in my opinion, is 70-90% of the value that such conferences can and should provide.   

 

Most events don’t do this well. First-time attendees often come with people they already know and stick together for most of the conference, mainly attending talks and failing to make many new connections. More experienced conference-goers know that this is not the way, so they “get out there” and say hi to people they don’t know. I was in that category, though I expect my social battery drains faster than that of most people. 

 

However, such an approach still misses out on most of the value such a conference has the potential to provide. This is because at an event of 100s of people, attendees have a really small chance of bumping into people with whom they would most benefit from talking to. While one can have pleasant small talk and learn about ideas they otherwise would not have heard about, this is far from being as useful as finding the top 20 people who are most relevant in terms of their work and have the chance of talking to them for 30 minutes each.

 

This is what networking apps can provide.

 

I’m personally familiar with Swapcard, as many are in the AI Safety community.

 

Here is what participants can do with it:

-Upload an introduction about themselves, and browse the profiles of other attendees

-Schedule 1-1 meetings during the conference to network, ask for advice, learn about people’s work, etc.

-Access the schedule and book their slots for sessions with a limited capacity

-Read about the speakers and organisations presenting at the conference

-Look at the floor plan

-Read the attendee guide

-Browse side events

-Report problems real-time to the organisers during the conference

-Give feedback after the events

-Anything else that organisers might want to share with attendees

 

Networking apps are immensely useful, so I hope that in the future IASEA and other conferences aiming to make AI go well, make use of them. 

 

Target audience

As I mentioned above, I really liked the fact that the conference brought together people from the AI Safety and AI Ethics communities. However, the group that it missed out on are the people these communities are trying to influence: policymakers. I haven’t checked this personally, but someone told me that out of the ~650 participants, only a couple of people had any government affiliation. For future conferences, it should be a big priority to get this group in the room too.

Next steps

Along with this post, I’m also publishing a vision of what I see as highly successful AI Safety conferences look like, and inviting you to make them happen. You can read it here.

7

1
0

Reactions

1
0

More posts like this

Comments4
Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

I can confidently say that IASEAI is seriously exploring Swapcard for the 2026 iteration. Regarding policymakers attending, this is a fair criticism, but one that's just much more difficult to achieve in practice. Specifically for 2025, funding for the February event wasn't even secured until late 2024; senior officials often have calendars booked months in advance, so I'm not surprised there was a lack of policymakers in attendance given the relative short notice + competing events happening in Paris that week + this being a brand new event. I expect this will improve somewhat organically over time as IASEAI builds brand credibility. 

Thanks for providing additional context! Really excited about this event series going forward!

I don't have a strong understanding of IASEAI, but it's less clear to me that an event like this needs to have policy-makers attending. It seems reasonable for there to be different events with different focuses, rather than each event having to cater to everyone.

Fair point!

More from gergo
Curated and popular this week
Relevant opportunities