EA Forum Bot Site
EA Forum

Comment Permalink
frances_lorenz19
1
1
12

This is a really good idea actually, but I have to be fundamentally opposed to this comment, sorry :( 

Reply
See in context
by frances_lorenz
2 min read 15

155

Building effective altruismApril Fools' DayEffective altruism culture
Frontpage

It is standard form in EA to state one's welcomingness of feedback, both in a personal and professional capacity. Individuals and organisations alike often have many means by which you can deliver feedback, whether through anonymous forms or direct communication, and forum posts will often begin or end with:

"I'm open to feedback..." 
"I'm looking for feedback of the following nature..." 
"I'm very full because I ate feedback for breakfast, but there's always room for more..." 
And so on.

I'm now wondering: what happens if you write, "I am not open to feedback". Literally, is that even allowed? I've never seen it done. I'm concerned to see such homogeneous thinking on the topic and I find it alarming that a community which espouses openness would be so closed off to non-openness.

How is it that not a single person in this intellectual, professional, personal community, or rather, in the sphere of this idea or philosophy, or whatever EA is.... Sorry, that sentence got too long, let me try again:

How is it possible that not a single person in EA holds a feedback-resistant worldview?

I fear – and now highly suspect – that stating a refusal to receive feedback would lead to an instant forum ban and possibly further ostracisation. I am not curious to hear from the forum team nor from moderators, I intend to hold this suspicion closely and indefinitely. I do not have an anonymous feedback form and I will be employing strong downvotes if I even catch a whiff of something that vaguely gestures in the direction of feedback, based solely on my personal conception of what feedback is.

I encourage downvotes of this post and disagree reacts, as I would then feel more confident that everyone is similarly closed off to alternate views. Although, those could also be interpreted as a disagreement of my very premise, which feels a lot like feedback. Understandably, I'm still working through the details (and I do not welcome outside perspective). 

In any case, I would like to formally state my categorical refusal to ever again receive feedback of any form. I expect this to extend to my professional work (I've gone ahead and deleted the 1-on-1 document between myself and my manager. I'm sure he'll understand. And even if he doesn't, I won't know).

Please confirm whether you can see this post.

155

1
16
1
1
16

Reactions

1
16
1
1
16
Comments15


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
peterbarnett50
15
1
3
4

I didn't read the post, so this isn't feedback. I just wanted to share my related take that I only want feedback if it's positive, and otherwise people should keep their moronic opinions to themselves. 

Reply
frances_lorenz17
7
0
4

I think this is very brave. 

Reply
Manuel Allgaier4
0
0
2

I didn't read your comment either, it just randomly occured to me that I should change my "anonymous feedback form" to "positive feedback form" and maybe add an extra "negative feedback form" that won't forward submissions to my email. 

Reply
Ben Millwood🔸38
3
0
11

This got me thinking:

 no namename
feedbackanonymous formnormal
no feedbackshut up???

Have you considered making a form where people can submit their names and nothing else?

Reply
frances_lorenz19
1
1
12

This is a really good idea actually, but I have to be fundamentally opposed to this comment, sorry :( 

Reply
MichaelDickens24
1
0

I will not be upvoting, downvoting, agree-voting, disagree-voting, or reacting to this piece, and I will not be leaving any comment except to say that I have no comment.

My lack of feedback should NOT be construed as an endorsement of your anti-feedback position.

Reply
frances_lorenz19
0
0

Thank you, I have no reply. 

Reply
Ben_West🔸18
2
0
2

Sad to see such a cult-like homogeneity of views. I blame Eliezer. 

Reply
frances_lorenz7
1
0

Typical anti-feedback-doomers making everyone scared to plug their ears, where does it end?

Reply
SiobhanBall10
1
0
1

No I can't see it. Do better 

Reply
frances_lorenz6
0
0
1

Okay, Claude says, "telling someone "Do better" could technically be considered feedback, but it's extremely limited and not very constructive," which makes it feel like not-quite-feedback. To your first point, I fear I've been shadow banned by the forum for speaking out :( 

Reply
SiobhanBall2
1
0

Don't do better. Is that better?

Reply
Neel Nanda6
0
0
5

Positive feedback: Great post!

Negative feedback: By taking any public actions you make it easier for people to give you feedback, a major tactical error (case in point)

Reply
frances_lorenz4
0
1
3
1

Hey Neel! This reply upset me so much that I'm now planning to make AGI and actively oppose AI safety :) Hope it was worth it!

Reply
More from frances_lorenz
46
From Google to co-founding a global health charity: Mid-career transitions with Martyn James
Career Week
frances_lorenz
· · 3m read
1
1
59
Private equity to shrimp welfare: Mid-career transitions in EA with Andrés Jiménez Zorrilla
Career Week
frances_lorenz
· · 4m read
6
6
45
Corporate law to CEA operations: Mid-career transitions with Kathleen Perell
Career Week
frances_lorenz
· · 4m read
1
1
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 22m read
 · 
The cause prioritization landscape in EA is changing. Prominent groups have shut down, others have been founded, and everyone’s trying to figure out how to prepare for AI. This is the third in a series of posts critically examining the state of cause prioritization and strategies for moving forward. Executive Summary * An increasingly common argument is that we should prioritize work in AI over work in other cause areas (e.g. farmed animal welfare, reducing nuclear risks) because the impending AI revolution undermines the value of working in those other areas. * We consider three versions of the argument: * Aligned superintelligent AI will solve many of the problems that we currently face in other cause areas. * Misaligned AI will be so disastrous that none of the existing problems will matter because we’ll all be dead or worse. * AI will be so disruptive that our current theories of change will all be obsolete, so the best thing to do is wait, build resources, and reformulate plans until after the AI revolution. * We identify some key cruxes of these arguments, and present reasons to be skeptical of them. A more direct case needs to be made for these cruxes before we rely on them in making important cause prioritization decisions. * Even on short timelines, the AI transition may be a protracted and patchy process, leaving many opportunities to act on longer timelines. * Work in other cause areas will often make essential contributions to the AI transition going well. * Projects that require cultural, social, and legal changes for success, and projects where opposing sides will both benefit from AI, will be more resistant to being solved by AI. * Many of the reasons why AI might undermine projects in other cause areas (e.g. its unpredictable and destabilizing effects) would seem to undermine lots of work on AI as well. * While an impending AI revolution should affect how we approach and prioritize non-AI (and AI) projects, doing this wisel
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
I am writing this to reflect on my experience interning with the Fish Welfare Initiative, and to provide my thoughts on why more students looking to build EA experience should do something similar.  Back in October, I cold-emailed the Fish Welfare Initiative (FWI) with my resume and a short cover letter expressing interest in an unpaid in-person internship in the summer of 2025. I figured I had a better chance of getting an internship by building my own door than competing with hundreds of others to squeeze through an existing door, and the opportunity to travel to India carried strong appeal. Haven, the Executive Director of FWI, set up a call with me that mostly consisted of him listing all the challenges of living in rural India — 110° F temperatures, electricity outages, lack of entertainment… When I didn’t seem deterred, he offered me an internship.  I stayed with FWI for one month. By rotating through the different teams, I completed a wide range of tasks:  * Made ~20 visits to fish farms * Wrote a recommendation on next steps for FWI’s stunning project * Conducted data analysis in Python on the efficacy of the Alliance for Responsible Aquaculture’s corrective actions * Received training in water quality testing methods * Created charts in Tableau for a webinar presentation * Brainstormed and implemented office improvements  I wasn’t able to drive myself around in India, so I rode on the back of a coworker’s motorbike to commute. FWI provided me with my own bedroom in a company-owned flat. Sometimes Haven and I would cook together at the residence, talking for hours over a chopping board and our metal plates about war, family, or effective altruism. Other times I would eat at restaurants or street food booths with my Indian coworkers. Excluding flights, I spent less than $100 USD in total. I covered all costs, including international transportation, through the Summer in South Asia Fellowship, which provides funding for University of Michigan under
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
TLDR When we look across all jobs globally, many of us in the EA community occupy positions that would rank in the 99.9th percentile or higher by our own preferences within jobs that we could plausibly get.[1] Whether you work at an EA-aligned organization, hold a high-impact role elsewhere, or have a well-compensated position which allows you to make significant high effectiveness donations, your job situation is likely extraordinarily fortunate and high impact by global standards. This career conversations week, it's worth reflecting on this and considering how we can make the most of these opportunities. Intro I think job choice is one of the great advantages of development. Before the industrial revolution, nearly everyone had to be a hunter-gatherer or a farmer, and they typically didn’t get a choice between those. Now there is typically some choice in low income countries, and typically a lot of choice in high income countries. This already suggests that having a job in your preferred field puts you in a high percentile of job choice. But for many in the EA community, the situation is even more fortunate. The Mathematics of Job Preference If you work at an EA-aligned organization and that is your top preference, you occupy an extraordinarily rare position. There are perhaps a few thousand such positions globally, out of the world's several billion jobs. Simple division suggests this puts you in roughly the 99.9999th percentile of job preference. Even if you don't work directly for an EA organization but have secured: * A job allowing significant donations * A position with direct positive impact aligned with your values * Work that combines your skills, interests, and preferred location You likely still occupy a position in the 99.9th percentile or higher of global job preference matching. Even without the impact perspective, if you are working in your preferred field and preferred country, that may put you in the 99.9th percentile of job preference
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
88
Strategic Animals Funding Circle - Results from first two rounds
Martijn Klop 🔸 , Joey🔸, JamesÖz 🔸
· · 10m read
4
4
79
80,000 Hours for Global Development
Benh713
· · 4m read
5
5
3
SenseMaking Summer School 2025, September 17-24th
finnclancy
· · 1m read
0
0
View more