A quick tip:
The recent freeze on USAID funding is a disaster that threatens the lives of countless individuals who rely on essential services like food and healthcare.
While USAID has faced many controversies and there's a pressing need for systemic change, ending its support in this abrupt manner results in tremendous unnecessary suffering, deaths and money wasted.
Even though there have been legal victories against Trump’s orders, it is unclear if the Trump administration will comply with those rulings and even if, it is unclear how much of the urgently needed money will flow again. (see https://www.devex.com/news/devex-newswire-judge-insists-trump-lift-the-aid-freeze-after-failing-to-do-so-109457)
Donate now to effective local organizations that were previously funded by USAID. By doing so, we can help mitigate the worst immediate consequences of the aid freeze. An initiative has emerged to facilitate this: The Rapid Response Fund: https://www.founderspledge.com/funds/rapid-response-fund.
The fund is run by the EA organization Founders Pledge. They offer you the opportunity to donate to impactful organizations that need financing due to the aid freeze (see their site for their selection criteria and process).
Donations to these organizations can have an extraordinary impact due to this special situation, so please donate now! Also, share and spread the word so that we can collectively alleviate the worst immediate consequences of the aid freeze and achieve structural changes.
Another option to help in this situation is to donate to the Foreign Aid Bridge Fund https://www.foreignaidbridgefund.org/ run by Unlock Aid (https://www.unlockaid.org/), a coalition of social enterprises, universities, multinationals, and philanthropies.
What do you think about the funds and other possible interventions to mitigate immediate effects? Do you see any?
Further Reading:
- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/beyond-shutdown-case-tax-justice-debt-reform-jessica-oddy-atuona-g0yse/
- https://www.unlockaid.org/follow-the-money
- https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:ugcPost:7294851102418583553?commentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28ugcPost%3A7294851102418583553%2C7295408233341423616%29&dashCommentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Afsd_comment%3A%287295408233341423616%2Curn%3Ali%3AugcPost%3A7294851102418583553%29
@Sanjay@Dorothy M. @Yelnats T.J. @Arturo Macias @Mihkel Viires 🔹 @Frank_R@Guy Raveh @Ian Turner @Xing Shi Cai @Matrice Jacobine @SiebeRozendal @Flo @TomDrake@River@ScienceMon🔸
Assuming there's effective political stuff to be done with respect to the USAID situation (which is uncertain to me), it's plausible that any hint of EA involvement would be affirmatively counterproductive. Better to have more politically popular entities -- and entities not predominately funded by a guy who gave megabucks to the current officeholder's rivals -- in the lead for this one. If, for instance, EAs wanted to funnel money to any such entities, I suspect it would be savvy to do so quietly rather than talking about it on-Forum. It's possible that is playing a role in the lack of discussion here, although I too suspect this would have gotten more attention ~18 months ago.