Comments
40
There are some schelling points in EA that aren’t a result of deliberate optimisation, but are instead a result of founder effects, path dependency etc
These equilibria may be suboptimal and hard to change by any individual, but with coordinated action we may be able to shift to a better equilibrium.
Put your ideas for ‘equilibrium shifts’ here and upvote ones you’d like to see happen - the most popular proposals will naturally be the easiest to implement.
Some examples:
"The main bottleneck to solving existential risks is Berkeley real estate." -leader of a high-in-demand Berkeley EA coworking space
Where can EAs coordinate to move to (that is not the oversaturated San Francisco Bay Area)?
I would be very much in favour of shifting the epicentre of the EA community to the East coast (Boston, NYC, and DC in particular), at least for the next 10 years. There are lots of good reasons for this:
There are lots of advantages to being based in the Bay Area. It seems both easier and higher upside to solve the Berkeley real estate issue that to coordinate a move away from the Bay Area.
Open Phil funds pro-housing advocacy, whose benefits are especially concentrated in areas like Berkeley, so these benefits will flow through to the EA and AIS communities as well.
The case for San Diego
I think that San Diego would be an excellent hub for EAs, especially people in the AI Alignment community
Disadvantages
I'm not convinced that the AI Safety community should move at all, but if it is to move, I think that a place like San Diego would be a natural place to consider.
the philly value prop
Not philly:
Reach out to me for a couch if you want to visit!
I'm expecting Berlin to really take off as a hub.