Hide table of contents

(The original post attempted to link to the horrible FTX situation. This was done in good faith - we wanted to channel the compassion to something useful. However, based on feedback this came across as headline-grabbing and it seemed too much like a promotion. We substantially rewrote it. We're sorry for any upset we may have caused some of you. Sincerely.).

We've seen many people benefit from personal development and practical wisdom. Concretely, we've seen this among our clients (we're coaches for EAs), friends, and in our own personal lives. However, not everyone has access to good ways of benefitting from personal development and practical wisdom. This could be due to a lack of awareness or financial means. While we think coaching is particularly promising (see here and here) we'd like to introduce a different (and free way) of pursuing personal development and practical wisdom. Concretely, we'd like to introduce a service called optimize.me (part of Heroic) as we've found that ~10 people within EA have benefitted non-trivially from it. We'll share a brief background on Optimize.me (Heroic) and then continue with a curated list of high EV recommendations.

 

Background

Heroic, founded by the exemplary Brian Johnson, seeks to create a more virtuous and flourishing society. Concretely, they seek to cultivate heroes and pursue the audacious vision of positive psychology - 51% of the world’s population flourishing by 2051. At some point during the last year, they decided to make part of their service (optimize.me) free and we'd like to enable others to use that to add value to their lives. 
 

How might optimize.me add value to your life?

There are three sources of value that we and ~ 10 others can personally attest to:

  1. Masterclasses: Long-form videos (1-2 hours) on essential domains of human life (e.g., conquering digital addiction, sleep, and productivity) that tend to be neglected in our current society and/or where the framing of these domains are highly suboptimal compared to what they could be.
  2. Philosopher’s notes: 6-page PDFs and associated 10-20 minutes videos on hundreds of books on personal development and practical wisdom.
  3. +1’s: Two-minute videos and associated notes providing wisdom in an engaging and bite-sized way.

     

Please bear in mind

  • The epistemics of the videos aren’t peer-reviewed science but rather relatively nuanced personal experiences, largely drawing on hundreds of books and creating connections between ideas, thinkers, and practitioners.
  • Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater. Brian’s content has substantially improved the lives of many people, including truth-seeking EAs. So while you might experience him as annoying, overly "American" or bombastic, you might be able to distill valuable pieces of information.

Masterclasses

  • Masterpiece days 101: It provides a motivating framing on how to think about your entire day as a potential masterpiece. Importantly, it introduces concrete cornerstone habits - e.g., deep work, shut-down complete, and digital sunset.
  • Greatest Year Ever: How to set ambitious yearly goals, embody your ideal self, and a generally useful framework for how to view and seize your precious time.
  • Conquering digital addiction 101: Shows the harm of digital consumption, perhaps a blindspot eating away at your well-being and productivity, and also provides helpful models and tools to cultivate healthy digital behavior.
  • Movement 101: Moving is an essential part of healthy and productive humans but is often neglected. This class points out the negative consequences of under-investing in movement and provides concrete practical advice on how to integrate more of it - beyond just going to the gym.
  • Goal-setting 101: Thorough and practical lessons on how to best set ambitious goals, avoid second-guessing, and use some best practices to reach them.
  • Anti-fragile 101: Key ideas on how to constructively respond to challenges and approach life, namely by seeing obstacles as opportunities to grow (“Bring it on!”). The class also links to growth mindset and highlights the importance of applying insights and big ideas, especially when it’s difficult.


 

Philosopher Notes

+1’s

 

How to integrate these ideas

In the following, we briefly outline a form of how to engage with the Heroic content and how to start integrating ideas into your life. 

Engaging with Heroic content is straightforward: create an account and access the content for free via the Website or mobile app. We suggest engaging with (1) the +1’s daily and (2) longer formats on the weekend or unhurried evenings.  The wisdom nuggets in the form of +1’s can fit well into a lunch break or morning routine. On Sundays, for instance, you can watch and process a Masterclass. Certainly, you know best how to fit educational and inspiring content into your schedule. 

The key move, though, is pick up ideas that resonate and start applying them (as opposed to mindlessly consuming the content).

Warriors vs. Librarians

When you have identified an idea or set of ideas that inspire you, let's bring them and their associated benefits to life. Rather than just consuming ideas and collecting them (like a librarian), the most important move is to take action and apply them in practice (like an applied philosopher). To deepen the understanding, we suggest bringing ideas into your life via the following pathways:

Self-facilitated: 

  1. Journal on the idea: 
    1. Elaborate in your own words: What is this idea about?
    2. How does this link to your knowledge or previous experience?
    3. What area or current pain point does it address?
  2. Set up an experiment: 
    1. In which way are you going to apply this idea?
    2. How long does the experiment run?
  3. Monitor and review: 
    1. How do you keep track of your intention to apply this idea? Consider using a simple spreadsheet.
    2. How did your experiment go?
    3. What are practical takeaways?

Facilitated: You may feel inspired to discuss ideas with someone that helps you on your personal journey, for instance, a coach, mentor or therapist. Ask them to facilitate understanding the idea better and putting it into practice.

Social: You may feel inspired to share and discuss ideas with friends and peers that are interested in wisdom and personal development. While intellectual engagement is encouraged, your aim should be to translate the idea into a practical mini-experiment.

Conflict of interest

Sebastian ($316) and Henning are symbolic founding investors in Heroic, which raised money through crowdfunding in 2021. On the one hand, that means you should probably assume that we're biased. On the other hand, it might signal that we actually think this is a valuable service and we'd like more people to benefit from it. 


 

Comments2


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:
Lorenzo Buonanno🔸
Moderator Comment3
1
0

As a moderator, I think this post is too close to promotion and reads too much like an advertisement.
When posting a resource on the forum, please don't try to sell it and make the connection to effective altruism clear.

Hi Lorenzo, thanks a lot for giving us feedback! That enables us to understand why it might not have been received in the way that we had hoped - namely to enable EAs to benefit from a resource that we think could probably be quite valuable to others. :) We significantly rewrote the post - hope this makes the communicative intent clearer. 

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 13m read
 · 
Notes  The following text explores, in a speculative manner, the evolutionary question: Did high-intensity affective states, specifically Pain, emerge early in evolutionary history, or did they develop gradually over time? Note: We are not neuroscientists; our work draws on our evolutionary biology background and our efforts to develop welfare metrics that accurately reflect reality and effectively reduce suffering. We hope these ideas may interest researchers in neuroscience, comparative cognition, and animal welfare science. This discussion is part of a broader manuscript in progress, focusing on interspecific comparisons of affective capacities—a critical question for advancing animal welfare science and estimating the Welfare Footprint of animal-sourced products.     Key points  Ultimate question: Do primitive sentient organisms experience extreme pain intensities, or fine-grained pain intensity discrimination, or both? Scientific framing: Pain functions as a biological signalling system that guides behavior by encoding motivational importance. The evolution of Pain signalling —its intensity range and resolution (i.e., the granularity with which differences in Pain intensity can be perceived)— can be viewed as an optimization problem, where neural architectures must balance computational efficiency, survival-driven signal prioritization, and adaptive flexibility. Mathematical clarification: Resolution is a fundamental requirement for encoding and processing information. Pain varies not only in overall intensity but also in granularity—how finely intensity levels can be distinguished.  Hypothetical Evolutionary Pathways: by analysing affective intensity (low, high) and resolution (low, high) as independent dimensions, we describe four illustrative evolutionary scenarios that provide a structured framework to examine whether primitive sentient organisms can experience Pain of high intensity, nuanced affective intensities, both, or neither.     Introdu
 ·  · 7m read
 · 
Article 5 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: "Obviously, no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment." OK, it doesn’t actually start with "obviously," but I like to imagine the commissioners all murmuring to themselves “obviously” when this item was brought up. I’m not sure what the causal effect of Article 5 (or the 1984 UN Convention Against Torture) has been on reducing torture globally, though the physical integrity rights index (which “captures the extent to which people are free from government torture and political killings”) has increased from 0.48 in 1948 to 0.67 in 2024 (which is good). However, the index reached 0.67 already back in 2001, so at least according to this metric, we haven’t made much progress in the past 25 years. Reducing government torture and killings seems to be low in tractability. Despite many countries having a physical integrity rights index close to 1.0 (i.e., virtually no government torture or political killings), many of their citizens still experience torture-level pain on a regular basis. I’m talking about cluster headache, the “most painful condition known to mankind” according to Dr. Caroline Ran of the Centre for Cluster Headache, a newly-founded research group at the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden. Dr. Caroline Ran speaking at the 2025 Symposium on the recent advances in Cluster Headache research and medicine Yesterday I had the opportunity to join the first-ever international research symposium on cluster headache organized at the Nobel Forum of the Karolinska Institutet. It was a 1-day gathering of roughly 100 participants interested in advancing our understanding of the origins of and potential treatments for cluster headache. I'd like to share some impressions in this post. The most compelling evidence for Dr. Ran’s quote above comes from a 2020 survey of cluster headache patients by Burish et al., which asked patients to rate cluster headach
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
A while back (as I've just been reminded by a discussion on another thread), David Thorstad wrote a bunch of posts critiquing the idea that small reductions in extinction risk have very high value, because the expected number of people who will exist in the future is very high: https://reflectivealtruism.com/category/my-papers/mistakes-in-moral-mathematics/. The arguments are quite complicated, but the basic points are that the expected number of people in the future is much lower than longtermists estimate because: -Longtermists tend to neglect the fact that even if your intervention blocks one extinction risk, there are others it might fail to block; surviving for billions  (or more) of years likely  requires driving extinction risk very low for a long period of time, and if we are not likely to survive that long, even conditional on longtermist interventions against one extinction risk succeeding, the value of preventing extinction (conditional on more happy people being valuable) is much lower.  -Longtermists tend to assume that in the future population will be roughly as large as the available resources can support. But ever since the industrial revolution, as countries get richer, their fertility rate falls and falls until it is below replacement. So we can't just assume future population sizes will be near the limits of what the available resources will support. Thorstad goes on to argue that this weakens the case for longtermism generally, not just the value of extinction risk reductions, since the case for longtermism is that future expected population  is many times the current population, or at least could be given plausible levels of longtermist extinction risk reduction effort. He also notes that if he can find multiple common mistakes in longtermist estimates of expected future population, we should expect that those estimates might be off in other ways. (At this point I would note that they could also be missing factors that bias their estimates of