Thanks for sharing! What is the case for people joining this instead of The Introductory EA Program?

I personally love this post as I've been thinking about some angles to contribute back to EA eg especially in terms of diversifying EA (perhaps in my case, I could connect with EA-Malaysia & scale more works alongside AIS; or start my own group), or some other ideas listed in GSheet of Projects EAIF might be excited about and Ideas EAIF is excited about post too last month, eg Epistemics Training, High-Quality Experimentation with TikTok idea, and Field-building efforts based around compute governance (as I'm also involved with PauseAI), after reading. 

I personally would love to join this, as Facilitator that Wants to be an Organizer in Scaling Altruism. Hence, I truly look forward for ways we could enhance the curriculum to also have some resources on running/ scaling EA post-course. 

Side question (of interest): would you say having a more defined target audience is better (eg EA discussion for students only rather than mixed)? I asked for input, based on your experiences, perhaps; the context of why I am interested to have a mixed group was to have a test on which target audience would be more effective post-course too.