Take the 2025 EA Forum Survey to help inform our strategy and prioritiesTake the survey
Hide table of contents

I’m in graduate school now (MPH @ Harvard), after 6 years working with a small start-up non-profit organization in India. Recently at EAG Boston, I did 1-1s with some of the smartest young people I’ve met - a sizable number finishing up college or a year/two out of college. I found myself repeating a few points of advice, and that’s usually a good cue that I should be writing them down. While folks well into their career often do a fantastic job of offering wise, usually far more well-considered advice, I believe there’s value in listening to people just a few years ahead of you. They are far more likely to remember their mistakes more accurately, and attempts to rectify them seem more relatable.

Why is this on the EA forum? EAG Boston helped me see how effective college-based EA chapters have been in inspiring younger people to participate in the movement. There’s so much energy and an even greater pressure on oneself to grow as quickly as one can. While there’s sufficient discourse on what’s worth doing, I want to see more of how to do the work.

About me: Currently, I’m a public health graduate student studying health and social behavior. Prior to this, I helped build an accelerator for founders of small, under-resourced childcare institutions to support them in integrating evidence-based practices in childcare and effective ways of their non-profit organizations. Doing this work forced me to learn ways of managing my own motivations, skills, and tantrums in a small, high-agency team! It was not a low-pressure way to learn, but I wouldn’t trade these experiences for anything else (maybe more money)

So you’ve done well in school - here’s how work can suck less for you:

Epistemic status: Slightly provocative, emerging hypotheses, rant-heavy

  1. Please don’t jump into grad school immediately! Grad school makes so much more sense when you’ve worked for a few years. You contribute more to classroom discussions, and your ability to call bullshit is greatly enhanced by existing in the professional world. I understand that a number of really smart, mostly econ-pilled EA-aligned folks want to jump into a PhD or an MPP, but if there’s one thing you take away from this post, let it be this. Your ability to make the best use of the incredible breadth of resources in grad school is so much more enhanced by knowing what you like, knowing what you’re good at, and, most importantly, knowing what’s useful out in the real world. Development contexts are so complex; people are driven by explicit/implicit incentives, and working hard at important problems involves judgment about what’s important!
  2. School is a pretty shitty training ground for real work. It’s highly likely that if you’ve consistently done well in tests, you are just really good at testing - you know what is being tested, you know the value of practice tests/previous year papers, you’re pretty aware of what you should be focusing on for the exams, and you’re able to do it in a relatively short period of time before your test. As a solidly good test-taker, I know how good this feels. It’s also a poor template for work because you need to show up every day. You’re often working towards multiple projects with results that are likely to show up 6 months or a year or two from the day you put in the work.
    1. It took me two years to learn how to show up consistently with as much energy and enthusiasm as I could muster. It was insanely long, and I wish I had worked on it more pointedly when I started!
    2. I treat my life as a series of projects, so the only thing that has worked for me is to break each massive project into smaller goals with tight timelines and super tight feedback loops about success, quality checks, and places of improvement
    3. Talk to your manager about this! They’re usually happy to help you figure out how to show up better for work.
    4. Experiment liberally - if your work is flexible and largely independently driven, attempt to use different productivity tools. I owe my life to focusmate, but I don’t need it as much anymore! Productivity is seasonal, and what’s important is that you record notes from this experience so you’re not starting from scratch each time you try to figure out how to get out of a rut.
  3. On the point of note-taking, I would also highly recommend keeping track of the feedback you receive. Literally, write it down. Why is that? It’s usually incredibly useful to make your mistakes so you can learn from them. But most people overestimate their ability to remember these learnings.
    1. For the better part of two and a half years, I maintained a document with the feedback I had received from my manager/ other mentors. The personal blends with the professional, so I would also reflect on therapy in the same document. This document played a crucial role in helping me avoid mistakes I had already made.
    2. By being able to learn from mistakes when I wasn’t so emotionally invested in the situation, I was able to build a much more realistic, detailed model of how I mess up, and why it matters. This allowed me to advocate for changes with myself with much more conviction.
    3. I made it a point to read the advice whenever I received new feedback.

      On April 19, 2022: “Repeated breaches in contract/lack of ownership affect how long a rope I’m given- more micro-management and fewer opportunities to step up”

  4. To give you some context to this entry, integrity is at the core of everything you build. I struggled with this; I still struggle with this. You must stay true to your commitments and be transparent when you cannot. Trust breaches are incredibly hard to bridge, for trust is earned through repeated action over extended periods of time. Operating in a trust deficit sucks. I can guarantee you that it’s far worse than acknowledging that you blundered and offering to clean up the mess
    1. Know your triggers. For me, when my manager asks me 5 questions in succession, I feel like I’m being put on the spot. I feel like I’m back in the classroom, and my teacher is upset with me for not knowing the answer. So, I instinctively fudge the truth of the matter to come off better than I would with a full, honest answer. It’s mostly not even a conscious decision. Once I identified this trigger, I told my manager about it. I told him that I would prefer to have these questions over email/text - so I feel less pressure. Being put on the spot is not something I can avoid forever, and I need to work through this, but it was helpful to discuss solutions with my manager.
    2. I’m also aware that what probably helped the most was going through this experience - but I would highly recommend learning from my mistake instead of dealing with this one on your own
    3. Excerpt from my feedback document about this conversation with my manager: “You have this impatient look and sigh that makes it very hard to say “repeat”; and it always makes me more conscious and likely to jump at answers instead of thinking them through. I’m letting you know that so I can consciously take more time”
  5. What’s crucial when you find out these patterns about yourself in work, is you have to remember these narratives about how you’re wired are not set in stone. Be kind to these patterns because these patterns have served you well. Don’t feel compelled to change them all at once because how you’re wired is valuable! My obsession with being perceived as smart makes it that much more likely that I would prepare for a meeting well in advance. Intentions are useful to analyze, but some actions are independently good, despite these intentions. When you do decide that some of these patterns don’t serve you well anymore, know that you can gently put them down. You can effectively reframe how you operate, acknowledging that narratives about your previous work do not need to hold true anymore.

    An entry from my feedback doc: “You’ve got to stand up for yourself when you feel like you and your work are being misinterpreted. It’s the only way you’re going to be able to break existing narratives that are pulling you down. You need to be able to call it out if you feel like someone’s belief/understanding of you and your work differs from how you see it. “

Know that this will be a slow change that requires consistent expression of the change and a willingness to make things uncomfortable when you feel like people are still holding older stories of you that aren’t true anymore. You have to give people the grace to get it wrong, but you don’t have to stay silent about it. Conversely, It’s more likely you’ll stick to it if you repeat this new commitment to yourself in public a few times.

13

1
0
2

Reactions

1
0
2

More posts like this

Comments5


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Strong +1 agreement to all points

Glad you found it interesting!

Thanks for your openness. Not an easy thing to do but gives a lot value to the reader.

Also great advice

Appreciate it! Thanks

Executive summary: Transitioning from school to work requires specific strategies and mindset shifts, including consistent work habits, careful feedback tracking, and self-awareness of triggers and patterns.

Key points:

  1. Avoid immediate grad school - work experience enhances academic learning and professional judgment
  2. School success doesn't translate directly to work success - develop consistent daily performance rather than test-taking skills
  3. Track and document feedback systematically to learn from mistakes and identify patterns
  4. Identify and communicate personal triggers/challenges to managers, but work to improve them gradually
  5. Build trust through consistent follow-through on commitments; breaches of trust are costly and hard to repair
  6. Actively work to change outdated narratives about yourself at work, while being patient with the process

 

 

This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
This morning I was looking into Switzerland's new animal welfare labelling law. I was going through the list of abuses that are now required to be documented on labels, and one of them made me do a double-take: "Frogs: Leg removal without anaesthesia."  This confused me. Why are we talking about anaesthesia? Shouldn't the frogs be dead before having their legs removed? It turns out the answer is no; standard industry practice is to cut their legs off while they are fully conscious. They remain alive and responsive for up to 15 minutes afterward. As far as I can tell, there are zero welfare regulations in any major producing country. The scientific evidence for frog sentience is robust - they have nociceptors, opioid receptors, demonstrate pain avoidance learning, and show cognitive abilities including spatial mapping and rule-based learning.  It's hard to find data on the scale of this issue, but estimates put the order of magnitude at billions of frogs annually. I could not find any organisations working directly on frog welfare interventions.  Here are the organizations I found that come closest: * Animal Welfare Institute has documented the issue and published reports, but their focus appears more on the ecological impact and population decline rather than welfare reforms * PETA has conducted investigations and released footage, but their approach is typically to advocate for complete elimination of the practice rather than welfare improvements * Pro Wildlife, Defenders of Wildlife focus on conservation and sustainability rather than welfare standards This issue seems tractable. There is scientific research on humane euthanasia methods for amphibians, but this research is primarily for laboratory settings rather than commercial operations. The EU imports the majority of traded frog legs through just a few countries such as Indonesia and Vietnam, creating clear policy leverage points. A major retailer (Carrefour) just stopped selling frog legs after welfar
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- > Why ending the worst abuses of factory farming is an issue ripe for moral reform I recently joined Dwarkesh Patel’s podcast to discuss factory farming. I hope you’ll give it a listen — and consider supporting his fundraiser for FarmKind’s Impact Fund. (Dwarkesh is matching all donations up to $250K; use the code “dwarkesh”.) We discuss two contradictory views about factory farming that produce the same conclusion: that its end is either inevitable or impossible. Some techno-optimists assume factory farming will vanish in the wake of AGI. Some pessimists see reforming it as a hopeless cause. Both camps arrive at the same conclusion: fatalism. If factory farming is destined to end, or persist, then what’s the point in fighting it? I think both views are wrong. In fact, I think factory farming sits in the ideal position for moral reform. Because its end is neither inevitable nor impossible, it offers a unique opportunity for advocacy to change the trajectory of human moral progress. Not inevitable Dwarkesh raised an objection to working on factory farming that I often hear from techno-optimists who care about the issue: isn’t its end inevitable? Some cite the long arc of moral progress; others the promise of vast technological change like cultivated meat or Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) which surpasses human capabilities. It’s true that humanity has achieved incredible moral progress for humans. But that progress was never inevitable — it was the result of moral and political reform as much as technology. And that moral progress mostly hasn’t yet extended to animals. For them, the long moral arc of history has so far only bent downward. Technology may one day end factory farming, just as cars liberated w
 ·  · 3m read
 · 
We’re already in the second half of 2025 and there are still an incredible number of EAGx and Summit events coming up, as well as the first ever EA Global: New York City. We’re so excited to continue watching the EA community connect and grow.  Below is our conference schedule for the rest of the year. We’re supporting the first EAGx in Brazil, and inaugural EA conferences in France, Vietnam, New Zealand, and Turkey. We hope to reach more people than ever before. Please spread the word, especially for events happening near you!  We are also eager to initiate new events; if you’d like to apply to run an EAGx or Summit in 2026, please fill out this form! Apply to run an EAGx or EA Summit in 2026 Upcoming EA conferences EA Global * EA Global: New York City (10–12 Oct) | Applications close September 28—apply now! EAGx * EAGxSãoPaulo (22–24 Aug) | Applications just extended until August 18—apply now! * EAGxBerlin (3–5 Oct) | Applications close September 7 * EAGxSingapore (15–16 Nov) Applications close October 20 * EAGxAustralasia (28–30 Nov) | Applications close November 9 * EAGxAmsterdam (12–14 Dec) | Applications close November 23 * EAGxIndia (13–14 Dec) | Applications close November 30 EA Summits * EA Summit: Paris (13 Sep 2025) | Applications close September 9 * EA Summit: Vancouver (19–20 Sep) | Applications close September 15 * EA Summit: Vietnam (20 Sep) | Applications close September 12 * EA Summit: Philippines (27 Sep) | Applications close August 20 * EA Summit: New Zealand (27 Sep) | Applications close September 12 * EA Summit: South Africa (11 Oct) | Applications close October 4 * EA Summit: Istanbul (18 Oct) | Applications close October 18 Tentative events that have not yet been confirmed:  * EA Summit: Bogota (Nov) * EA Summit: Los Angeles (22 Nov) What is the difference between EA Global, EAGx, and EA Summits? * EA Global (EAG) conferences are for people with a firm grasp of EA principles who are taking, or planning to take,