Dear Friend,
I know we don’t see eye to eye on this, and I’m not writing to scold you. You’re a serious person who cares about the future going well. That’s exactly why I want you to look at something you haven’t examined closely: why is this community, working on a problem meant to matter for everyone, so overwhelmingly missing Black researchers?
You’ll say it’s the pipeline. I used to think that too, but look at where the actual friction is. Funding here runs on warm introductions and trust built over years in the same handful of universities, forums, and social circles. If a Black applicant didn’t grow up adjacent to those circles, they’re not failing on merit; they’re failing to have a name a grantmaker already recognizes. Fellowships often ask for a track record in a field that has, until recently, made almost no effort to recruit from HBCUs or Black-led computer science programs, then treat the resulting gap as evidence of lower interest rather than lower access. And hiring leans hard on “culture fit,” which in practice means fluency in a specific set of forum threads and thought experiments, not fluency in the actual underlying math or safety problem.
None of this requires anyone to be prejudiced. It just requires nobody to check where the money and mentorship are actually flowing. A community that extends moral concern effortlessly to future generations and hypothetical algorithms, but can’t get funding to the Black researcher applying for a fellowship right now, has a gap worth sitting with rather than explaining away.
What would change my mind: look at the last ten fellowship cohorts and see who’s missing. Ask whether the application process assumes access most Black applicants haven’t had. And ask whether “we’d fund anyone qualified” is doing the same quiet work “we just prefer people like us” did before.
Dear Friend,
I’m writing to you from two centuries in your future. I know you strive to be a thoughtful, compassionate person who lives a good and principled life according to the standards of your time. But I want to ask you to pause and examine a practice that feels entirely normal and routine to you: the industrial exploitation and consumption of animals.
In your era, raising animals for food and labor is treated simply as a necessity of life, a natural order, or a harmless tradition. Because almost everyone around you participates without a second thought, it is easy to assume there is no moral issue at stake. But consider what we now know: animals possess complex nervous systems, clear capacities for joy, fear, and social bonding, and a deep ability to feel physical and emotional pain.
When we confine them to tiny spaces, separate mothers from their young, and end their lives prematurely for our convenience or diet, we are inflicting immense suffering on sentient beings who have no voice to protest.
If you agree that causing unnecessary suffering is wrong, then the circle of who deserves our compassion cannot stop at human beings. It must expand to include all creatures who can feel pain and desire to live.
I ask you to look past what is culturally convenient and begin questioning these practices. What small choices can you make today to reduce the harm caused to the animals around you?
With hope and respect,
A friend from the future