Hide table of contents

Actually Relevant is a news curation service that evaluates stories based on how important they are for humanity. Our AI system reads hundreds of stories each week and turns some of the most relevant 1-2% into a website, newsletter, and podcast.

People at CEA mentioned that a service like this could become part of this forum and encouraged us to collect feedback. So here we go:

  1. Do you consider the stories vastly more relevant than the average news item that you see in other news outlets?
  2. What do you like about the overview?
    If you subscribed, what convinced you to do so?
  3. Anything we should do differently?
    If you didn't subscribe, what stopped you from doing so?

Most important stories of the week - 3-8 June

Human Development

"The world’s best investment": ~$100bn investments in global health since 1994 will save >40m lives by 2040
Vox Future Perfect, June 04
Policy Cures Research found that $97.9 billion spent on combating infectious diseases in poor countries since 1994 will avert 40.7 million deaths by 2040, yielding a $49.7 trillion benefit. "The full investment will avert, the report finds, about 40.7 million total deaths between the years 2000 and 2040," said Vox Future Perfect.
Article | AI analysis

Global child malnutrition: Unicef report finds 181m children in severe food poverty
The Guardian, June 06
A Unicef report reveals that one in four young children globally are at risk of irreversible harm due to poor diets, with 181 million children consuming only two food groups daily. "This can have an irreversible negative impact on their survival, growth and brain development," said Catherine Russell, Unicef’s executive director.
Article | AI analysis

Planet & Climate

Climate change impacts groundwater quality: Millions affected by rising temperatures
SPIEGEL, June 07 The article discusses how climate change is impacting groundwater quality and biodiversity, affecting millions of people. "According to the press release, little was previously known about how the warming of the Earth's surface as a result of climate change affects groundwater." - SPIEGEL
Article | AI analysis

Risk to global coastal cities: Thwaites "Doomsday" Glacier is melting rapidly
BBC Science Focus, June 06
The Thwaites Glacier in West Antarctica is melting faster than expected, posing a significant risk of sea level rise. "Courage means accepting the need to adapt, protecting coastal communities where it’s possible to do so, and rebuilding or abandoning them where it’s not," said Dr. Kaitlen Naughten.
Article | AI analysis

Existential Risks

International Health Regulations: WHO commits to global pandemic agreement
WHO, June 01
The World Health Assembly agreed on critical amendments to the International Health Regulations and committed to finalizing a global pandemic agreement within a year. "The amendments to the International Health Regulations will bolster countries' ability to detect and respond to future outbreaks and pandemics," said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
Article | AI analysis

Potential conflict in South China Sea: New Chinese law raises global tensions Asia Times, June 04
China’s new law to arrest foreign nationals in the South China Sea could trigger a military confrontation with the US. "If a Filipino citizen was killed by a willful act, that is very close to what we define as an act of war. Is that a red line? Almost certainly," said Ferdinand Marcos Jr.
Article | AI analysis

Science & Technology

Carbon capture: Iceland's Mammoth plant aims to remove 36,000 tons of CO₂ annually
BBC Science Focus, June 07
Climeworks has unveiled Mammoth, the world’s largest direct carbon capture and storage plant in Iceland. "Mammoth aims to remove 36,000 metric tons of carbon from the air each year – roughly the same as taking 8,600 cars off the road," according to BBC Science Focus.
Article | AI analysis

AI-based weather forecasting: Microsoft’s Aurora predicts weather and air pollution levels
phys.org, June 05
Microsoft has unveiled Aurora, an AI-based weather forecasting system that can predict global weather and air pollution levels more quickly than traditional systems. "Microsoft describes it as a system made with 'flexible 3D Swin Transformers, with Perceiver-based encoders and decoders.'" (phys.org)
Article | AI analysis

Get involved

  • Evaluation instructions. Do you work in any of the following areas? If so, we'd love your help to improve our evaluation instructions for news items: AI Risks, Pandemics, Nuclear War, Natural Catastrophes.
  • Sources. Do you have a good overview of global news in any of the following areas? If so, are there any additional sources that we should screen? Current list of sources: Human Development, Planet & Climate, Existential Risks, Science & Technology.
  • Project team. Actually Relevant is a not-for-profit side venture. We're happy about anybody who wants to contribute, especially if you have expertise in journalism, social media, web-development, or AI engineering.
Comments7


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

I didn't know the site and have looked at it just now for the first time. I like it and think it offers news which are way more relevant than usual.

One comment I have is that the 'general news' section covers the 'popular' wars in Gaza and Ukraine while neglecting other conflicts which are currently taking place and threatening harm to many people, e.g. in Sudan. I would've liked to hear about more of them.

Thanks for the feedback!

The system has picked up on Sudan (https://actuallyrelevant.news/?s=sudan) to some extent, starting in May 2023 with the UN warning of a "full-blown catastrophe", in September 2023 on Sudan having fallen "over the edge of mass atrocities", in February 2024 with ~11m people uprooted and ~19m children out of school; and recently highlighting 18m affected by food insecurity.

Still, the system would probably benefit from news sources that specialize on under-reported conflicts. If anybody knows a good one, please let us know!

You may find other sources from the links I include in these newsletters.

Monthly Overload of EA

Global Development & EA

Also if there was a way of automating this work, I'd be interested in chatting about that.

There is! You can use the technology behind Actually Relevant to create bespoke feeds with your own news sources and relevance criteria. I sent a DM to schedule a call.

Cool project - I tried to subscribed to the podcast, to check it out. But I couldn't find it on pocketcasts, so I didn't (didn't seem worth me using a 2nd platform).

I wanted to subscribe because I've wanted an audio feed that will help me be in touch with events outside my more specific areas of interest that i hear about through niche channels while I commute, while not going quite as broad / un-curated as the BBC news (which I currently use for this) -- and this seemed like potentially a good middle ground.

tiny other feedback: the title feels aggressive to me vs. some nearby alternatives (e.g. just "relevance news" or something) - since it nearly states that anything that is not there is not actually relevant at all, which is a fairly strong claim I could see people getting unhappy about.

Thanks so much for the feedback!

I submitted the podcast to PocketCasts. I should be available within a few days. (Also Podchaser and a few others I had missed.)

I agree that "Actually Relevant" can come off as dismissive or confrontational. I'll check how big of an issue this is for other people. Maybe we can balance this impression somehow with other aspects of the service. I'm hesitant about changing the name as that would be quite a hassle.

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 16m read
 · 
This is a crosspost for The Case for Insect Consciousness by Bob Fischer, which was originally published on Asterisk in January 2025. [Subtitle.] The evidence that insects feel pain is mounting, however we approach the issue. For years, I was on the fence about the possibility of insects feeling pain — sometimes, I defended the hypothesis;[1] more often, I argued against it.[2] Then, in 2021, I started working on the puzzle of how to compare pain intensity across species. If a human and a pig are suffering as much as each one can, are they suffering the same amount? Or is the human’s pain worse? When my colleagues and I looked at several species, investigating both the probability of pain and its relative intensity,[3] we found something unexpected: on both scores, insects aren’t that different from many other animals.  Around the same time, I started working with an entomologist with a background in neuroscience. She helped me appreciate the weaknesses of the arguments against insect pain. (For instance, people make a big deal of stories about praying mantises mating while being eaten; they ignore how often male mantises fight fiercely to avoid being devoured.) The more I studied the science of sentience, the less confident I became about any theory that would let us rule insect sentience out.  I’m a philosopher, and philosophers pride themselves on following arguments wherever they lead. But we all have our limits, and I worry, quite sincerely, that I’ve been too willing to give insects the benefit of the doubt. I’ve been troubled by what we do to farmed animals for my entire adult life, whereas it’s hard to feel much for flies. Still, I find the argument for insect pain persuasive enough to devote a lot of my time to insect welfare research. In brief, the apparent evidence for the capacity of insects to feel pain is uncomfortably strong.[4] We could dismiss it if we had a consensus-commanding theory of sentience that explained why the apparent evidence is ir
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
I recently read a blog post that concluded with: > When I'm on my deathbed, I won't look back at my life and wish I had worked harder. I'll look back and wish I spent more time with the people I loved. Setting aside that some people don't have the economic breathing room to make this kind of tradeoff, what jumps out at me is the implication that you're not working on something important that you'll endorse in retrospect. I don't think the author is envisioning directly valuable work (reducing risk from international conflict, pandemics, or AI-supported totalitarianism; improving humanity's treatment of animals; fighting global poverty) or the undervalued less direct approach of earning money and donating it to enable others to work on pressing problems. Definitely spend time with your friends, family, and those you love. Don't work to the exclusion of everything else that matters in your life. But if your tens of thousands of hours at work aren't something you expect to look back on with pride, consider whether there's something else you could be doing professionally that you could feel good about.
 ·  · 14m read
 · 
Introduction In this post, I present what I believe to be an important yet underexplored argument that fundamentally challenges the promise of cultivated meat. In essence, there are compelling reasons to conclude that cultivated meat will not replace conventional meat, but will instead primarily compete with other alternative proteins that offer superior environmental and ethical benefits. Moreover, research into and promotion of cultivated meat may potentially result in a net negative impact. Beyond critique, I try to offer constructive recommendations for the EA movement. While I've kept this post concise, I'm more than willing to elaborate on any specific point upon request. Finally, I contacted a few GFI team members to ensure I wasn't making any major errors in this post, and I've tried to incorporate some of their nuances in response to their feedback. From industry to academia: my cultivated meat journey I'm currently in my fourth year (and hopefully final one!) of my PhD. My thesis examines the environmental and economic challenges associated with alternative proteins. I have three working papers on cultivated meat at various stages of development, though none have been published yet. Prior to beginning my doctoral studies, I spent two years at Gourmey, a cultivated meat startup. I frequently appear in French media discussing cultivated meat, often "defending" it in a media environment that tends to be hostile and where misinformation is widespread. For a considerable time, I was highly optimistic about cultivated meat, which was a significant factor in my decision to pursue doctoral research on this subject. However, in the last two years, my perspective regarding cultivated meat has evolved and become considerably more ambivalent. Motivations and epistemic status Although the hype has somewhat subsided and organizations like Open Philanthropy have expressed skepticism about cultivated meat, many people in the movement continue to place considerable hop