Comments
154
Headline finding: I audited 17 AI Safety Talent programmes. Zero of 17 have published any comparison group, rejected-applicant follow-up, matched control or randomisation. Not one. Every programme that mentions a counterfactual does it by asking participants to self-report.
Background
At least $70 million...
The Existential Risk Observatory (based in the Netherlands) is doing projects in this direction. For an example, see here.
Thanks Irene! This is what I was after :)