Hide table of contents

Forecasting tools and prediction markets allow you to state your credence in something precisely and view others' credences. This can be an important way of gathering information from a group or sharing information precisely between individuals. 

This post will introduce a few tools for generating and sharing predictions. Many of these tools are excellent; they've been grouped together because of their similarity and number. 

One way I think forecasting tools can be useful for collaborative truth-seeking is that spending some time using them can improve both your calibration and your ability to precisely define questions. I think this can then greatly improve your ability to communicate your implicit beliefs explicitly in conversation or text. I'd be interested to hear other people's opinions on this view! 

Forecasting tools and putting precise numbers on predictions in general is important because it lets a community approach truth over time better by letting people have a more transparent track record to learn who is in fact good at predicting.

This post will discuss the following tools:

  • Metaculus 
  • Manifold Markets
  • Pastcasting
  • Confido
  • PredictionBook
  • Elicit

When can forecasting/prediction tools be useful?

  • Practice predicting so that you're better able to communicate your beliefs verbally (especially PredictionBook, Pastcasting)
  • Get community predictions relevant to deciding where to donate, e.g.:
    •  AI milestones
    • Cultured meat
    • Factory farming
    • Global poverty
    • Politics 
  • Make a private question to ask people in your organisation to predict project outcomes or engagement (Confido)
  • Add a prediction question on your post to see if people's views change after reading (Elicit)
  • Find out how people feel about a controversial topic (with people who feel more strongly able to influence the result more; e.g. here)
  • Learn to forecast (especially Pastcasting)
  • Perform curious self-referential research on prediction markets[1] (Manifold Markets)

Metaculus

Metaculus is a reputation-based site for soliciting and aggregating predictions.

The official Metaculus tutorials are suitable for beginners as a way to introduce forecasting, probability distributions, and a basic understanding of how to behave under uncertainty. 

Tutorial #1 is over-explaining for those with a basic understanding of the forecasting, but still a good introduction to using Metaculus specifically. 

For those familiar with forecasting, tutorials #2 and #3 are more useful as a (small) amount of calibration practice and building familiarity with the Metaculus interface. 

Examples

Note that you can embed metaculus questions in forum posts by posting the direct link into the editor:

Manifold Markets 

Manifold Markets is a play money prediction market with user-created questions. The play money can be redeemed as a charitable donation. Because it works as a market, it can be used in lots of interesting ways-- you can ask people to predict which opportunities your organisation will fund (as one factor to influence your decision, maybe), you can play chess, and you can even implement futarchy.

A text tutorial is available on the wiki here

Examples

Note that you can embed Manifold Markets questions into forum posts by pasting the direct link into the editor:

Other Tools

Pastcasting is a forecasting platform using resolved questions from other sites (e.g. Metaculus) to shorten the feedback loop and practice forecasting, particularly over long time horizons. The official FAQ is a great introduction. In partcular, I'd like to highlight Pastcasting's feature Vantage Search:

Vantage Search is a custom search engine that only shows results from before the vantage point to prevent information leaks from the future.

Confido is tool that provides an instance of a closed forecasting platform. Forecasts are entered similarly to on metaculus, but questions are intended for a single group or organisation. This is useful for questions requiring insider knowledge like "How will the EA conference we are planning go" or "How many employees will we have by the end of the year". Trying the demo version is a good way to understand the tool.

PredictionBook is simple tool for prediction by entering a % credence only. You write can write a question, put the date when you should know the true answer by, and enter a credence. On the date you entered, you'll be notified to give the true answer. 

Predictions can be public or private; I find it's particularly useful for producing personal questions "in 2023, will I go 60 days without allergy symptoms?" as a way of improving your calibration (including an automatic calibration graph[2]). 

Elicit Forecast is a tool that lets you easily set up  questions people can put credences on, and shows an aggregate of them, but is currently unsupported[3]. At present, only binary questions (with a % chance input) work as far as I can tell; date or number estimate questions are currently non-functioning. There is no guarantee any functionality will continue. 

Binary elicit forecasts currently work as embeds:

1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
13%
14%
15%
16%
17%
18%
19%
toribrk (15%)
20%
21%
22%
23%
24%
25%
26%
27%
28%
29%
30%
31%
32%
33%
34%
35%
36%
37%
38%
39%
40%
41%
42%
43%
44%
45%
46%
47%
48%
49%
50%
51%
52%
53%
54%
55%
56%
57%
58%
59%
Saul Munn (56%)
60%
61%
62%
63%
64%
65%
66%
67%
68%
69%
70%
71%
72%
73%
74%
75%
76%
77%
78%
79%
80%
81%
82%
83%
84%
85%
86%
87%
88%
89%
90%
91%
92%
93%
94%
95%
96%
97%
98%
99%
1%
Will the US retail price of lemons be above $2.10 on 01-12-23?
99%

Personal Experience

I don't honestly use prediction or forecasting tools much in my day-to-day life[4]. If this were to change I think I'd be most likely to use PredictionBook to improve my calibration on everyday questions that I need to be able to predict, or manifold markets simply for fun. 

I think if you're regularly making big decisions like grant making or running projects in AI, biosecurity, etc., forecasting tools like Metaculus or Manifold could be useful, particularly the comments (where other people explain their reasoning). Similarly, I think Confido would be useful for a sufficiently-sized organisation. 

Elicit is useful because of its ability to be embedded & interacted with in forum posts. If somebody picks up supporting the tool & fixes the current issues, I imagine I'd add it to a lot more forum posts. 

Try it Yourself!

You can access the below market to buy shares yourself here.

I'd also suggest making an account on PredictionBook and formalising 3 predictions that you're currently making implicitly! Here are some suggestions to get the ball rolling:

  • The completion date of a current project
  • How much money you'll donate to charity before 31/12/2023
  • How many people will read your next forum post
  • How successful you will be with your new year's resolution
  • Your total spending this month
  • What time you'll get home today

Tomorrow at 6pm GMT we'll also be running a short event  in the EA GatherTown to discuss forecasting tools & do a short exercise about them!

Also, join us at 6pm GMT today in the GatherTown to discuss the use of Squiggle!

 

  1. ^
  2. ^

    i.e. a graph of "% you assigned to an outcome" against "% chance that that actually happened" (which would be the line y=x if you were perfectly calibrated)

  3. ^

    Private communication, Ought

  4. ^

    Though we did get feedback from people who do on various drafts of this post, don't worry!

  5. Show all footnotes
Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 7m read
 · 
This is a linkpost for a paper I wrote recently, “Endogenous Growth and Excess Variety”, along with a summary. Two schools in growth theory Roughly speaking: In Romer’s (1990) growth model, output per person is interpreted as an economy’s level of “technology”, and the economic growth rate—the growth rate of “real GDP” per person—is proportional to the amount of R&D being done. As Jones (1995) pointed out, populations have grown greatly over the last century, and the proportion of people doing research (and the proportion of GDP spent on research) has grown even more quickly, yet the economic growth rate has not risen. Growth theorists have mainly taken two approaches to reconciling [research] population growth with constant economic growth. “Semi-endogenous” growth models (introduced by Jones (1995)) posit that, as the technological frontier advances, further advances get more difficult. Growth in the number of researchers, and ultimately (if research is not automated) population growth, is therefore necessary to sustain economic growth. “Second-wave endogenous” (I’ll write “SWE”) growth models posit instead that technology grows exponentially with a constant or with a growing population. The idea is that process efficiency—the quantity of a given good producible with given labor and/or capital inputs—grows exponentially with constant research effort, as in a first-wave endogenous model; but when population grows, we develop more goods, leaving research effort per good fixed. (We do this, in the model, because each innovator needs a monopoly on his or her invention in order to compensate for the costs of developing it.) Improvements in process efficiency are called “vertical innovations” and increases in good variety are called “horizontal innovations”. Variety is desirable, so the one-off increase in variety produced by an increase to the population size increases real GDP, but it does not increase the growth rate. Likewise exponential population growth raise
 ·  · 14m read
 · 
As we mark one year since the launch of Mieux Donner, we wanted to share some reflections on our journey and our ongoing efforts to promote effective giving in France. Mieux Donner was founded through the Effective Incubation Programme by Ambitious Impact and Giving What We Can. TLDR  * Prioritisation is important. And when the path forward is unclear, trying a lot of different potential priorities with high productivity leads to better results than analysis paralysis. * Ask yourself what the purpose of your organisation is. If you are a mainly marketing/communication org, hire people from this sector (not engineers) and don’t be afraid to hire outside of EA. * Effective altruism ideas are less controversial than we imagined and affiliation has created no (or very little) push back * Hiring early has helped us move fast and is a good idea when you have a clear process and a lot of quality applicants Summary of our progress and activities in year 1 In January 2025, we set a new strategy with time allocation for our different activities. We set one clear goal - 1M€ in donations in 2025. To achieve this goal we decided: Our primary focus for 2025 is to grow our audience. We will experiment with a variety of projects to determine the most effective ways to grow our audience. Our core activities in 2025 will focus on high-impact fundraising and outreach efforts. The strategies where we plan to spend the most time are : * SEO content (most important) * UX Optimization of the website * Social Media ; Peer to Peer fundraising ; Leveraging our existing network The graphic below shows how we plan to spend our marketing time: We are also following partnership opportunities and advising a few high net worth individuals who reached out to us and who will donate by the end of the year. Results: one year of Mieux Donner On our initial funding proposal in June 2024, we wrote down where we wanted to be in one year. Let’s see how we fared: Meta Goals * Spendi
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Sometimes working on animal issues feels like an uphill battle, with alternative protein losing its trendy status with VCs, corporate campaigns hitting blocks in enforcement and veganism being stuck at the same percentage it's been for decades. However, despite these things I personally am more optimistic about the animal movement than I have ever been (despite following the movement for 10+ years). What gives? At AIM we think a lot about the ingredients of a good charity (talent, funding and idea) and more and more recently I have been thinking about the ingredients of a good movement or ecosystem that I think has a couple of extra ingredients (culture and infrastructure). I think on approximately four-fifths of these prerequisites the animal movement is at all-time highs. And like betting on a charity before it launches, I am far more confident that a movement that has these ingredients will lead to long-term impact than I am relying on, e.g., plant-based proteins trending for climate reasons. Culture The culture of the animal movement in the past has been up and down. It has always been full of highly dedicated people in a way that is rare across other movements, but it also had infighting, ideological purity and a high level of day-to-day drama. Overall this made me a bit cautious about recommending it as a place to spend time even when someone was sold on ending factory farming. But over the last few years professionalization has happened, differences have been put aside to focus on higher goals and the drama overall has gone down a lot. This was perhaps best embodied by my favorite opening talk at a conference ever (AVA 2025) where Wayne and Lewis, leaders with very different historical approaches to helping animals, were able to share lessons, have a friendly debate and drive home the message of how similar our goals really are. This would have been nearly unthinkable decades ago (and in fact resulted in shouting matches when it was attempted). But the cult