I work as a researcher in statistical anomaly detection in live data streams. I work at Lancaster University and my research is funded by the Detection of Anomalous Structure in Streaming Settings group, which is funded by a combination of industrial funding and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (ultimately the UK Government).
There's a very critical research problem that's surprisingly open - if you are monitoring a noisy system for a change of state, how do you ensure that you find any change as soon as possible, while keeping your monitoring costs as low as possible?
By "low", I really do mean low - I am interested in methods that take far less power than (for example) modern AI tools. If the computational cost of monitoring is high, the monitoring just won't get done, and then something will go wrong and cause a lot of problems before we realise and try to fix things.
This has applications in a lot of areas and is valued by a lot of people. I work with a large number of industrial, scientific and government partners.
Improving the underlying mathematical tooling behind figuring out when complex systems start to show problems reduces existential risk. If for some reason we all die, it'll be because something somewhere started going very wrong and we didn't do anything about it in time. If my research has anything to say about it, "the monitoring system cost us too much power so we turned it off" won't be on the list of reasons why that happened.
I also donate to effective global health and development interventions and support growth of the effective giving movement. I believe that a better world is eminently possible, free from things like lead pollution and neglected tropical diseases, and that everyone should be doing at least something to try to genuinely build a better world.
Ah, you won't get sustained working relationships from a bootcamp. The people who attend bootcamps are your competition, and the people who run bootcamps are teaching context rather than facilitating networking, and don't really have the brain space to form sustained relationships with cohort members.
Unfortunately, EA is full of a lot of people who are job hunting for the same jobs, which makes the community around this activity overly transient and, at times, divisive. I've written twice on this forum about the fact that we need to get better at lowering our infrastructure costs, and having less competitive application processes for infrastructure attendance focused around deeper networking and community capital development.
Finding the more stable, more unified parts of EA will help you build long-term relationships, but you'll probably be (directly or indirectly) expected to put in some money or volunteer time to do so.
If you find someone who gives a substantial amount of money to AI safety, they're probably the kind of person who would assist with your job hunting if you convinced them you're competent. But these kinds of people are found at effective giving focused events and spaces.
I'll continue to recommend a residential at the EA hotel in Blackpool UK. It operates as the shadowy centre of a surprising number of things in AI safety, its staff team are good at providing job hunting assistance, and its alumni network is vast and all over EA. The application process is relatively easy, because it selects for commitment by placing itself outside the Loxbridge bubble. And their £30 a night (food included) Patron rate basically removes the application process, they just check you understand what EA is and agree to follow their code of conduct.
https://aisafety.com/hackathon this is coming up and will likely have the "correct" people in attendance.
Posting reports on the EA forum about things you did, that others can usefully learn from, is another way of building the longer-term relationships. So it's good you found your way here!
Best of luck with the job hunt.
Oh, also - good job posting your first article on the EA Forum!
The fact that you have previously asked for spiritual direction means you're significantly closer than many other people on this Forum to "getting it", I reckon.
Things I'll recommend for keeping your fuel in a job rejection heavy life:
Reading Effective Altruism in the Garden of Ends https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/AjxqsDmhGiW9g8ju6/effective-altruism-in-the-garden-of-ends - in all of that, there's a quote about spiritual nourishment coming from a particular kind of quality of attention.
The Experiment with Light network: www.experiment-with-light.org.uk - the ExL is there as solo meditations, but they really are best done in groups. Done right it'll get you off "should" without getting you off committed motivation.
Looking up the PIN (position-interest-need) model for depolarisation, putting yourself on one P and someone you're trying to understand more on the other P, and going deeper until you find the shared N. Ideally this would be facilitated in a workshop the first few times you do it so you can be corrected on obvious mistakes. But I think you're probably pretty intelligent and would get stuff out of self-attempts.
Befriending someone local who's a singer and getting them to regularly sing you some of their favourite songs. If this sounds real scary, going to Sacred Harp meetups resulted in something similar.
Looking into the Active Hope framework (it's designed around climate doom, it works for EA doom with minimal alterations).
Once you've tried out some, you may gain understanding that interpersonal bonding over shared witnessing of the beautiful unites all these things, and (hopefully) also your spiritual direction, and indeed much of the best parts of EA. Once you've a) got the underlying concept and b) realised beauty is immaterial so it doesn't have to cost much money as long as you know your beauty sense well, you can probably work out how to fill your schedule with more of whatever best does it for you.
--
Things I'll recommend for getting you a job:
Going for a residency at the EA Hotel in Blackpool, UK and using it to in-person network yourself into a job.
Volunteering at something you're good at already and visibly demonstrating altruism and competency in front to other EAs, and then asking them to help review your job applications. You probably do have an ingroup signalling problem rather than a competency problem, and the easiest fix is to demonstrate competency in front of EAs who are able and willing to fix the ingroup signals of competent people, because they understand that's a very high-impact action.
Dialing down the quantity of your job applications and upping the quality of each one. The mental cost (or gain) of job rejection should be taken into account in your calculus - it's fundamentally net negative applying for jobs where you'll be rejected and won't learn anything from the rejection.
I'd recommend the various AI safety bootcamps for gaining context, but honestly I think the EA Hotel would be faster and more convenient around any schedule you have.
One thing I really don't see much in community-first EA talk:
Things like just asking a local scout leader to help run your retreat, or someone from your local church who helps run the youth camp, or someone from the Rotary club, or someone who coordinates volunteers at the community arts cafe. A lot of what EA needs is not "special" and the skills to create it can be found elsewhere in your local area.
I agree that an EA community needs high conduct standards for those present that go beyond "don't do bad" to reach "actively help out where this is possible at low cost to you".
I definitely think classic style should be taught more!
For EAs, there's a great argument about classic and postmodern writing styles on Less wrong - which is clearer for communication? https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/h8ZBxrBoSEtvpKc94/against-classic-style
I agree the comms is currently not as good as it could be.
I think the massive push to expand effective giving through a large variety of (non-CEA) methods might well take over EA external comms in the next few years. And I'm hoping the effects of that will eventually bounce back and fix CEA. There will just be a lot more comms-understanding EA-committed people in the EA hiring pool.
I'm also very hopeful about NEST, which seems to have understood that things like "hold a Nerdfighters or Kursgesagt meetup" is a thing a local EA group should be doing to attract the people who might become an EA, and is not cringe-bad-wrong-unprofessional.
Honestly you'd have a great time at EA in the Lakes and should come to the next one I run. More generally, you want to get yourself into an EA group space of people who make donations (of money and/or time) to EA infrastructure, rather than being in receipt of resources from EA infrastructure. The vibe is totally different: the questions are freer, and we help each other clarify the answers to being more truthful and more loving and more actionable because we all want our donations to be used well.
I think possibly the issue is that there's a lot of effort being put in to manage reputational risks, possibly without quite understanding exactly what the forward-looking reputational risks are (because you're reacting to bad things that have happened). That's got to be really tricky.
EA is deficient in character training. Now, teaching character is best done through interpersonal interactions, but here's a rough summary of some things for young EAs.
I am extremely glad EAGx is back in the UK! Well done for getting it off the ground, and I hope the event goes super well!