I am only 14 years old, but I have decided that when I grow up I am going to be an effective altruist. I am obviously not going to share my identity, but my current plan for when I grow up is to literally donate as much as I possibly can; this would obviously involve spending very little on myself, likely I would be working a very high-paying job, but living in very low-quality conditions, probably I would live in a camper van, working around 14 hours a day. I am not making this post for anyone to tell me I am naive or that I have no idea what that kind of life will bring; I know that most likely, I will hate my life. That is not to say I hate my life now: I have a lot of friends, I have a great family, and right now, I do love life. But it is about the future when I will be donating everything. I also know that most likely, nobody will want to live with me, because who besides me would want to live that kind of life? I have spent hours searching the internet, and I have not found a single person who has ever donated everything. However, that is what this post is about: I am trying to find anyone on this forum who also will be or is donating everything to charity. I am not going to share my identity or anything, but I did want to see if anyone else here is actually going to donate everything.

15

1
1
1

Reactions

1
1
1
Comments15


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

You should consider that living in such conditions will likely lead to burnout. 

Altruism is a marathon not a sprint. You should focus on having a high impact over your whole career, which will involve not pushing yourself literally as hard as possible all the time. You are only human, regardless of what your ethics say.

That said, there are cases of people living somewhat as you describe and giving a lot of money away - see here

There is also this (publicly listed) talk from 2022:
 

(Couldn't click on your linked comment from mobile, so here it is in case it helps others. Oliver Yeung's backstory is striking, thanks for sharing the links to his main talk and Q&A)

Edited, thank you!

S
2
0
0

Thank you, this was helpful to read and although I disagree, I do see your points about how this will probably lead to burnout.

In addition, Chuck Feeney, Zell Kravinsky, and from antiquity, Diogenes

Also Charles Gray of the "world equity budget."

S
1
0
0

Thank you.

I didn't grow up to donate everything, but I had that goal when I was about your age. My writing from my 20s has some stuff that you might find relevant or useful: http://www.givinggladly.com/

Tangent: when I was reengaging seriously with EA before eventually changing my career path, your story was among the ones in Strangers Drowning that powerfully resonated with me. So it was interesting for me to learn recently that you felt strangely about MacFarquhar’s coverage of you and Jeff in SD.

S
1
0
0

Thank you!

Incredible resolve, Steven. It’s rare to see someone—let alone a 14-year-old—grapple so squarely with how much good a single salary can buy. You’re right: a single $5 k donation to AMF plausibly saves a life, so every extra dollar you push toward the margin matters enormously.

I sometimes feel that EA discussions lean too far toward “Careful, you’ll burn out—dial it back.” Burnout is real, but the analysis often weights personal discomfort as if it were on par with someone else’s entire life. Even if an austere lifestyle shortens a career a bit, the extra years of near-maximal giving you do manage could still dominate the equation. The stakes are that high.

Keep refining the plan, of course—experiment with smaller pledges first, protect your health so you can give longer—but never lose sight of the basic arithmetic that inspired you. The world needs more people willing to do what you’re contemplating. I’m cheering you on.

S
5
0
0

I completely agree with what you are saying, thank you for the comment!

Thanks for writing this and huge kudos for thinking so deeply about your future at such a young age!

I live on what most would consider little money and can assure you that one can live very happily like that! I however work to help people directly. rather than earning to give away so that's a bit different than your plan. I can see the good that comes from our work every day, while those great people who earn money to give it away are a bit more removed,. Living simply and giving a lot away can be immensely rewarding, though of course challenging due to it being so against societal norms.

There's a book "Strangers Drowning" I would recommend which has some great case studies of people living in fairly extreme ways in line with their strong convictions.

All the best for your next few years of school and ongoing journey thinking about how to do good with your life :).

S
1
0
0

Thank you!

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
Regulation cannot be written in blood alone. There’s this fantasy of easy, free support for the AI Safety position coming from what’s commonly called a “warning shot”. The idea is that AI will cause smaller disasters before it causes a really big one, and that when people see this they will realize we’ve been right all along and easily do what we suggest. I can’t count how many times someone (ostensibly from my own side) has said something to me like “we just have to hope for warning shots”. It’s the AI Safety version of “regulation is written in blood”. But that’s not how it works. Here’s what I think about the myth that warning shots will come to save the day: 1) Awful. I will never hope for a disaster. That’s what I’m trying to prevent. Hoping for disasters to make our job easier is callous and it takes us off track to be thinking about the silver lining of failing in our mission. 2) A disaster does not automatically a warning shot make. People have to be prepared with a world model that includes what the significance of the event would be to experience it as a warning shot that kicks them into gear. 3) The way to make warning shots effective if (God forbid) they happen is to work hard at convincing others of the risk and what to do about it based on the evidence we already have— the very thing we should be doing in the absence of warning shots. If these smaller scale disasters happen, they will only serve as warning shots if we put a lot of work into educating the public to understand what they mean before they happen. The default “warning shot” event outcome is confusion, misattribution, or normalizing the tragedy. Let’s imagine what one of these macabrely hoped-for “warning shot” scenarios feels like from the inside. Say one of the commonly proposed warning shot scenario occurs: a misaligned AI causes several thousand deaths. Say the deaths are of ICU patients because the AI in charge of their machines decides that costs and suffering would be minimize
 ·  · 14m read
 · 
This is a transcript of my opening talk at EA Global: London 2025. In my talk, I challenge the misconception that EA is populated by “cold, uncaring, spreadsheet-obsessed robots” and explain how EA principles serve as tools for putting compassion into practice, translating our feelings about the world's problems into effective action. Key points:  * Most people involved in EA are here because of their feelings, not despite them. Many of us are driven by emotions like anger about neglected global health needs, sadness about animal suffering, or fear about AI risks. What distinguishes us as a community isn't that we don't feel; it's that we don't stop at feeling — we act. Two examples: * When USAID cuts threatened critical health programs, GiveWell mobilized $24 million in emergency funding within weeks. * People from the EA ecosystem spotted AI risks years ahead of the mainstream and pioneered funding for the field starting in 2015, helping transform AI safety from a fringe concern into a thriving research field. * We don't make spreadsheets because we lack care. We make them because we care deeply. In the face of tremendous suffering, prioritization helps us take decisive, thoughtful action instead of freezing or leaving impact on the table. * Surveys show that personal connections are the most common way that people first discover EA. When we share our own stories — explaining not just what we do but why it matters to us emotionally — we help others see that EA offers a concrete way to turn their compassion into meaningful impact. You can also watch my full talk on YouTube. ---------------------------------------- One year ago, I stood on this stage as the new CEO of the Centre for Effective Altruism to talk about the journey effective altruism is on. Among other key messages, my talk made this point: if we want to get to where we want to go, we need to be better at telling our own stories rather than leaving that to critics and commentators. Since
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Shape and lead the future of effective altruism in the UK — apply to be the Director of EA UK. The UK has the world's second-largest EA community, with London having the highest concentration of EAs globally. This represents a significant opportunity to strengthen and grow the effective altruism movement where it matters most. The EA UK board is recruiting for a new Director, as our existing Director is moving on to another opportunity. We believe that the strongest version of EA UK is one where the Director is implementing a strategy that they have created themselves, hence the open nature of this opportunity. As Director of EA UK, you'll have access to: * An established organisation with 9 years of London community building experience * An extensive network and documented history of what works (and what doesn't) * 9+ months of secured funding to develop and implement your vision, and additional potential funding and connections to funders * A supportive board and engaged community eager to help you succeed Your task would be to determine how to best leverage these resources to maximize positive impact through community building in the UK. This is a unique opportunity for a self-directed community-builder to shape EA UK's future. You'll be responsible for both setting the strategic direction and executing on that strategy. This is currently a one-person organisation (you), so you'll need to thrive working independently while building connections across the EA ecosystem. There is scope to pitch expansion to funders and the board. We hope to see your application! Alternatively, if you know anyone who might be a good fit for this role, please email madeleine@goodstructures.co.