Hi Habeeb,
I work at GWWC as the Head of Marketing :)
Thank you for your generosity and for sharing your perspective! We are actively interested in how we can help cultivate people giving effectively from all over the world, so this is really helpful feedback for us!
I've asked someone on the team who knows why we have the $5 minimum to follow up in the comments here, so stay tuned for their response. My guess is that with the processing fees associated, it might not make sense for us to support donations less than $5 - but this post will help us challenge those assumptions!
On why we don't have a bigger range of charities to donate to: We have a pretty strict process in terms of the charities we allow on our platform, which you can read more about in our inclusion criteria if you're interested. Basically, we want to make sure that donors have options that are sufficiently high-impact, and that the charities get sufficient value from being on our platform.
Some suggestions on donating smaller amounts:
- If there is a trusted person in the group, you could pool all your money together to be able to reach the threshold of $5, and maybe you could make a collaborative decision on where to donate - this could even be a nice way to help talk about giving and your thought process with friends.
- Wait until you are able to donate the minimum $5, and set aside this money in the meantime.
- Against Malaria Foundation allows donations as low as $2 USD: https://www.againstmalaria.com/Donation.aspx
I also liked the suggestions from others in the comments. I think there's lots of ways to donate and they don't all necessarily go through GWWC!
I appreciate your perspective on wanting to cultivate the habit of donating small amounts but also generally caution that especially for students, that you're making sure you have enough for your own expenses and emergencies first. Making sure that the habit is sustainable is an important factor for long term giving!
Thanks again for sharing this, Habeeb and I'll make sure someone else follows up about the $5 limit!
This is incredibly good and generous of you, but also I suspect that even on purely altruistic grounds it makes more sense to save the money for yourself and become slightly less risk averse as a result?
I don’t have a good model or rigorous justification for this, just an intuition
I disagree, giving habits are important to cultivate early, from a habit perspective even if from a dollar utility perspective you may be right.
Important to consider though!
Hypothesis: A big reason why organizations like Givewell exist is because developed currencies go further in developing countries -- but, it's hard for people in developed countries to know the best foreign orgs to give to. Givewell fills that gap by doing research and publicizing it.
Insofar as that hypothesis is true, we should encourage EAs in developing countries to look for giving opportunities in their personal network, if good opportunities seem to exist there.
Here's another way of making the same argument:
GiveDirectly does blanket cash transfers for entire communities.
A hypothetical version of GiveDirectly which targets only the very neediest individuals, or only the most inspired entrepreneurs who will do the most to stimulate the local economy and reduce poverty, could be even more cost-effective. (IIRC, Givewell thinks most of the impact from their top charities comes from indirect "flow-through effects".)
Sadly, targeting individual recipients isn't possible at the scale GiveDirectly operates at. But, targeting individual recipients does seem feasible for an individual African donor who has a strong local network.
Note also that GiveDirectly has lost many thousands of dollars to fraud? Presumably, fraud would be less of an issue for a savvy local donor.
I think this argument is weakest in areas where local knowledge doesn't help a lot for knowing what works.
Even though Givewell is based in the US, for a while they were ranking US educational charities. Having a strong local network in the US doesn't necessarily help a ton for knowing which educational interventions work.
However, I still think a "randomized" giving algorithm such as "if your friends say this school really helped their kid, donate to that school" might work quite well for a lot of small donors at scale.