Hide table of contents

Abstract

Do you wish you could increase your productivity while socializing with other effective altruists? Are you tired of browsing social media instead of getting your project done or engaging in meaningful interaction? Would you like to meet new people who can be friends or collaborators?

For this purpose, we created an EA community group on FocusMate:

https://www.focusmate.com/signup/EffectiveAltruism

Focusmate is a platform that is centered around one on one video calls for accountability regarding focused work. Therefore it both can help you improve your productivity and fosters exchange and value-creation in the EA Community. The latter can be both understood as something you want to have or to give to others.

Focusmate has transformed my productivity over the past few months. It applies many things we know from psychology about getting things done in one platform. And I consider it a valuable idea to combine its group feature with the EA community!

What is FocusMate?

It is a platform where you can select 50 minutes working sessions and get randomly matched with your "focus mate" from somewhere on the globe. You then check in with one another via video call, tell each other your intentions for the 50 minutes, and start working while seeing one another. After a gong in the end you reflect how it went, thank one another for working together and leave the chat again.

It does multiple things well:

  • you have a social commitment to another person to show up to your work session (you also have an attendance rate shown in your profile and one-on-ones increase the responsibility a lot in comparison to a study group where you can assume someone else will be there anyway)
  • you formulate a concrete task to work on and have to think about your intentions
  • you have social contact (you can learn a bit about the other person from time to time and learn what others work on)
  • you reflect on your progress in the end, which also helps to calibrate the amount of time that is realistic for a task ("do you always over or underachieve on your intentions?")
  • and you express gratitude for the other person being your focus mate in the end expressing gratitude is one of the most powerful happiness behaviors)

The founders also launched the function "FocusMate groups" that members can join (upon invitation) to then get primarily matched with other people from that group.

Vision

I think it would be very valuable, partly by being simply enjoyable, to work via video chat with random other effective altruists.

My experience was that in study groups I saw other people for weeks or months, but never had a 1:1 conversation with them and sometimes didn’t even learn their name.

I remember how I felt so lonely in my first two years as an EA, far away from the big hubs some years ago. I felt like I didn’t fully belong, because of that, as I saw the geographical hubs do things together and me not even interacting with them virtually.

Some of these issues could have been fixed by FocusMate and an EA group on it.

You always also get to know one another a bit, get work done, feel connected, can probably coordinate better, and much more.

You can frame being on there both as getting something from the community, but also as providing something to it, by making others productive and feel like they belong.

The EA community group

After requesting to create an Effective Altruism Group it turned out another EA was faster than me and a group with around 90 people already existed.

We are now working on making it common knowledge that this group exists. Please help spread the word by sharing this article.

The group has been founded and is administered by Dony Christie, who also crowdfunded the first months of funds needed. Thank you very much Dony!

CEA will cover the costs for an additional three months, while we test how the community uses the service. We are still in the process of defining what “testing” means. We are relatively certain that number of people who join and use the service is an obvious metric, so, well, join and use the service and give us qualitative feedback (comment) how you like it.


Join via this link:

https://www.focusmate.com/signup/EffectiveAltruism

Please share the link and this post with other effective altruists.


It will be an ongoing process to spreading it while also protecting it from people who shouldn’t be in it. At this point in time, the first point is more important.


Best Practices

On Focusmate, some guidelines to follow are:

  • Show up on time
  • Be friendly and encouraging
  • Ask what the other person will work on, and define your task(s)
  • Asking whether or not to mute during the session
  • Working focused during the session and checking in whether your FocusMate also does so
  • Check-in with one another after the gong to reflect about the session
  • EA bonus: If you have time, interacting with your FocusMate. You could ask classical questions like what cause areas they are excited about, where in their “impact journey” they currently are, provide relevant information or just have some fun interaction.

Looking forward to see you via video chat and working together soon!

Anna


PS: After 6 years of being very active in the movement this is my first EA Forum post. Thanks to Aaron Gertler for the nudge to do so.

Comments12


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

If you're reading this post and wondering whether the Focusmate group is still being used, it very much is! (April 2023) 

More than ever as far as I can tell 

Thanks for posting this! I just joined the group. I've been on Focusmate for a couple of months and spotted the "EA Movement" badge on a few people's profiles, but the couple of people whom I asked didn't know how I could join.

I definitely second the productivity boost, especially for people who have found themselves working at home for the first time.

EA focusmate is awesome, and still active (March 2024)! I use it maybe a couple hours a day on average to get through important but non-urgent tasks, tasks that are hard to start, or anything I've procrastinated on. I love being connected with others in the EA community preferentially, and just having a couple minute discussion of what their working on and what I'm working on is really motivating. Also I've hired 3 people that I met through EA focusmate, and would not have met them otherwise, so also great for networking. Happy focusmating!

I'm working on a software project that is quite esoteric - it is only meant to be understood by other software developers. I have signed up to Focusmate but you can't pick a partner in a narrowly defined way like "must be a programmer" (especially as Focusmate has no such information about users). But Michael A is working on "optical computers", I guess I'll give him a try.

Okay, this is weird... how is it that I can pick a person on the Calendar and book with them, but I can't create my own "unmatched" session? If I create a session in an empty slot, I am silently and automatically matched with "Gonzalo P".

Just to clarify: Focusmate isn't meant to talk about your work, so most people don't try to find people with in-depth knowledge. I mostly don't explain things in detail and don't feel like I need to. It's more an accountability thing and to share general progress (e.g. "I wanted to get 3 tasks done: write an email, draft an outline for a blog post, and solve a technical issue for my software project. I got 2 of them done, and realized I need to ask a colleague about #3, so I did that instead).

This looks cool, I just signed up. Hope to see you guys online.


Update: I love Focusmate and it is directly responsible for me actually getting anything done. 11/10, hugely recommend.

I currently have a daily focusmate for 2 hours. I prefer longer focustmate than 1 hour, and with the same person. So if anyone is interested in having a recurrent session from 1 to 8 hours, let me know.

It now handles 75 min and also 25min. There have been a bunch of other updates that generally make it easier to use, including a built-in picture-in-picture so that a little video window stays on top, as you're working and you don't have to have the focusmate window on top at all

Anyone else not able to join the group through the link? 🤔 It just redirects me to the dashboard without adding me in

 

Focusmate has changed a lot since this post was published; maybe invite links are disabled by now.

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 17m read
 · 
TL;DR Exactly one year after receiving our seed funding upon completion of the Charity Entrepreneurship program, we (Miri and Evan) look back on our first year of operations, discuss our plans for the future, and launch our fundraising for our Year 2 budget. Family Planning could be one of the most cost-effective public health interventions available. Reducing unintended pregnancies lowers maternal mortality, decreases rates of unsafe abortions, and reduces maternal morbidity. Increasing the interval between births lowers under-five mortality. Allowing women to control their reproductive health leads to improved education and a significant increase in their income. Many excellent organisations have laid out the case for Family Planning, most recently GiveWell.[1] In many low and middle income countries, many women who want to delay or prevent their next pregnancy can not access contraceptives due to poor supply chains and high costs. Access to Medicines Initiative (AMI) was incubated by Ambitious Impact’s Charity Entrepreneurship Incubation Program in 2024 with the goal of increasing the availability of contraceptives and other essential medicines.[2] The Problem Maternal mortality is a serious problem in Nigeria. Globally, almost 28.5% of all maternal deaths occur in Nigeria. This is driven by Nigeria’s staggeringly high maternal mortality rate of 1,047 deaths per 100,000 live births, the third highest in the world. To illustrate the magnitude, for the U.K., this number is 8 deaths per 100,000 live births.   While there are many contributing factors, 29% of pregnancies in Nigeria are unintended. 6 out of 10 women of reproductive age in Nigeria have an unmet need for contraception, and fulfilling these needs would likely prevent almost 11,000 maternal deaths per year. Additionally, the Guttmacher Institute estimates that every dollar spent on contraceptive services beyond the current level would reduce the cost of pregnancy-related and newborn care by three do
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Need help planning your career? Probably Good’s 1-1 advising service is back! After refining our approach and expanding our capacity, we’re excited to once again offer personal advising sessions to help people figure out how to build careers that are good for them and for the world. Our advising is open to people at all career stages who want to have a positive impact across a range of cause areas—whether you're early in your career, looking to make a transition, or facing uncertainty about your next steps. Some applicants come in with specific plans they want feedback on, while others are just beginning to explore what impactful careers could look like for them. Either way, we aim to provide useful guidance tailored to your situation. Learn more about our advising program and apply here. Also, if you know someone who might benefit from an advising call, we’d really appreciate you passing this along. Looking forward to hearing from those interested. Feel free to get in touch if you have any questions. Finally, we wanted to say a big thank you to 80,000 Hours for their help! The input that they gave us, both now and earlier in the process, was instrumental in shaping what our advising program will look like, and we really appreciate their support.
calebp
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
I speak to many entrepreneurial people trying to do a large amount of good by starting a nonprofit organisation. I think this is often an error for four main reasons. 1. Scalability 2. Capital counterfactuals 3. Standards 4. Learning potential 5. Earning to give potential These arguments are most applicable to starting high-growth organisations, such as startups.[1] Scalability There is a lot of capital available for startups, and established mechanisms exist to continue raising funds if the ROI appears high. It seems extremely difficult to operate a nonprofit with a budget of more than $30M per year (e.g., with approximately 150 people), but this is not particularly unusual for for-profit organisations. Capital Counterfactuals I generally believe that value-aligned funders are spending their money reasonably well, while for-profit investors are spending theirs extremely poorly (on altruistic grounds). If you can redirect that funding towards high-altruism value work, you could potentially create a much larger delta between your use of funding and the counterfactual of someone else receiving those funds. You also won’t be reliant on constantly convincing donors to give you money, once you’re generating revenue. Standards Nonprofits have significantly weaker feedback mechanisms compared to for-profits. They are often difficult to evaluate and lack a natural kill function. Few people are going to complain that you provided bad service when it didn’t cost them anything. Most nonprofits are not very ambitious, despite having large moral ambitions. It’s challenging to find talented people willing to accept a substantial pay cut to work with you. For-profits are considerably more likely to create something that people actually want. Learning Potential Most people should be trying to put themselves in a better position to do useful work later on. People often report learning a great deal from working at high-growth companies, building interesting connection