Do we know how much impact Sam Bankman-Fried‘s personal philosophy is going to have on FTX’s grant-making choices? This is a lot of financial power for a single organization to have, so I expect the makeup of the core team to have an outsized effect on the rest of the movement.
We plan to distribute at least $100M this year, and potentially a lot more, depending on how many outstanding opportunities we find. In principle, we’d be able to deploy up to $1B this year.
TLDR: Take the population ethics quiz here: https://mdickens.me/pop-ethics/
Population ethics is an oft-overlooked subfield within ethics. Many people hold views that they don't realize contradict each other, or that have strange implications that they wouldn't endorse if they thought about it more.
Not just that—population ethics is a BIG DEAL. A lot of ethical decisions hinge on how you think about changes in future populations....
A preliminary estimate, and a request for better ones.
Summary
I believe the standard literature estimates for the number of DALYs attributable to a case of stunting are too low, largely because they don’t account for the long term effects. This means that childhood nutritional interventions that reduce the prevalence of stunting may be substantially more cost-effective than previously believed.
Epistemic status
Exploratory and back-o...
I’ve been feeling pretty shaken since the METR report about the Hugging Face incident came out last week. Over the weekend, I wrote up some thoughts on how lonely the AI situation sometimes feels to me. It’s more personal than what I’d usually share publicly, but I thought I’d post it here in case it resonates with anyone else.
I’m very grateful to the man...
Warning: Lots of napkin math below. Lending y'all an Idea That Is Not Yet Fully Formed™. But wanted to share so you get a rough map of longtermist funding.
So, taking GiveWell and Open Phil together, here's how much EA money has been given per year throughout the 2020s:
$400M, not bad.
But this is actually going to ramp up a bunch in the coming few years. Open Phil only regranted $100M to GiveWell in 2020, but they plan to grant GiveWell $300M in 2021, $500M in 2022, and $500M again in 2023.
So how much will Open Phil be granting total?
Based on 2021 data, GiveWell granting is roughly 50% of Open Phil's budget:
So by increasing their 2022/2023 GiveWell giving to $500M, we'd roughly expect Open Phil to give $1B by that time:
As you can see, longtermism (in red) is roughly 30% of all EA giving. In 2021, it was roughly 15% of Open Phil giving.
So, assuming roughly 20% of Open Phil's giving is longtermist, and assuming other longtermist donors are roughly 20% of Open Phil's longtermist giving, here's what longtermist giving looks like until now:
This is good! It's a reflection of the EA ecosystem accounting for the idea that ~future lives matter.
But FTX Future Fund is about to drastically increase it even more. They're trying to give $100M in 2022 alone. Here's what the graph will look like going forward:
That's a big yellow jump! It makes longtermist giving look like this for 2022:
But even this assumes that Open Phil is going to 2x their longtermist grantmaking in a similar fashion as they're pumping money into GiveWell.
If they keep their longtermist grantmaking at current levels, around $100M, the 2022 pie chart looks like this:
So, yes, the FTX Future Fund is a big deal for the longtermist funding ecosystem.
The EA funding ecosystem has had a shift. Dustin Moskovitz was a Web2 Facebook Money. SBF is Web3 FTX Money.
This means we should add a new player, FTX, (in green!) to our overall EA giving graph below.
Hope this helps give context to FTX's longtermist grantmaking.
Thanks for reading and don't forget to apply for that sweet sweet cash from FTX Future Fund by March 21.
Notes:
Not quite sure why some numbers don't add up. 1) Ben Todd averaged 2017-2019 to get $260M. I can't quite tell how much Open Phil themselves say they gave in 2019. They just say "over $200M". 2) The graph here shows that Give Well raised $91M from Open Phil in 2020. But then Open Phil says they granted $100M. I'm working with public data and doing napkin math so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
For more on why Open Phil is giving more to Give Well, see this post. Although at the top they emphasize: This post is unusually technical relative to our others, and we expect it may make sense for most of our usual blog readers to skip it. 😂
As a reminder, other big crypto EA funders include Vitalik and Ben Delo.
This format is amazing. More please.
+1 -- love it Rhys; more memes pls