EA Forum Bot Site
EA Forum

Take the 2025 EA Forum Survey to help inform our strategy and prioritiesTake the survey
Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
Pablo2
0
0

Also [very minor]: the "load more" button loads 10 additional posts, but because of the three-column layout, this means that two out of three times the final line of posts will be incomplete. I think the "load more" button should instead load nine posts, or a multiple of three.

Reply
See in context
by Sarah Cheng
3 min read 5

78

CommunityBuilding effective altruismEffective Altruism Forum
Frontpage

It’s been four months since our last forum update post! Here are some things the dev team has been working on.

We launched V1 of a new Events page

It shows you upcoming events near you, as well as global events open to everyone! We think it’s now the most complete overview of EA events that exists anywhere.

Some improvements we’ve made over the last few months:

  1. Anyone can post an event on the new Events page by clicking on “New Event” in their username dropdown menu in the Forum. (We also have a contractor who cross-posts many events).
  2. You can easily add an event to your calendar, or be notified about events near you.
  3. Events now have images, which we think makes the page more engaging and easier to parse.
  4. We’ve improved the individual event pages, to show key information more clearly, and make it obvious how you can attend an event.
  5. You can see upcoming events in the Forum sidebar.

If you think the new Events page is useful, please share it widely! :)

We also made a number of small improvements to the Community page, and we’re working on a significant redesign, to make it more visual and groups-focused.

Update: We launched the redesigned Community page! This will eventually replace the EA Hub groups list. (If you would like to be assigned as a group organizer to one of the groups on the Forum, or if you know of groups that are missing, please let me know.)

100+ karma users can add co-authors

It’s now possible for users to add co-authors to their posts. As a precaution against spamming, this is currently only available to users with 100+ karma. If you have less karma, feel free to contact us to add co-authors.

We updated the Sequences page

We renamed it to “Library” and highlighted some core sequences, like the Most Important Century series by Holden Karnofsky.

We merged our codebase with LessWrong

Now we share a Github repo: ForumMagnum. Feel free to check out what we’re working on, and do let us know of any issues you see.

We ran the EA Decade Review

Thanks to everyone who participated! The Review ran from December 1 to February 1. Our team has been busy since then, but we should be posting about the results soon - I know I’m looking forward to reading it! :)

We started reworking tag subscriptions

Currently, “subscribing” to a tag on the Forum means you get notifications for new posts with that tag. However, we are moving more toward the YouTube model, where “subscribing” weights posts with that tag more heavily on the frontpage, and you can separately sign up for tag notifications via the bell icon. See more details here.

Right now this new version is behind the “experimental features” flag, so if you want to play with it you’ll have to check this box in your account settings:

You can now change your username

You can now change your username (i.e. display name) yourself via your account settings page. However, you only get one change - after that, you’ll need to contact us to change it again. 

We can also hide your profile from search engines and change the URL associated with your profile. Please contact us if you’d like to do this.

We added footnotes support to our default text editor

Last but certainly not least, we deployed one of the most requested Forum features: footnotes! See the standalone post for more details.

Questions? Suggestions?

We welcome feedback! Feel free to comment on this post, leave a note on the EA Forum feature suggestion thread, or contact us directly.

Join our team! :)

We’ve built a lot these past few months, but there’s much more to be done. We’re currently hiring for software developers to join our team and help us make the EA Forum the best that it can be. If you’re interested, you can apply here.

78

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments5
Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
NunoSempere10
0
0

100+ karma users can add co-authors

Much appreciated!

Reply
Pablo8
0
0

Currently, “subscribing” to a tag on the Forum means you get notifications for new posts with that tag. However, we are moving more toward the YouTube model, where “subscribing” weights posts with that tag more heavily on the frontpage, and you can separately sign up for tag notifications via the bell icon.

This is great. It would also be valuable (though probably not high priority) to have a Wikipedia-style "watchlist" where users could see all the activity related to the entries they are subscribed to, including new edits to those articles.

Separately, in order to avoid needless jargon, I vote for calling the "sequences" collections.

Reply
Sarah Cheng3
0
0

Thanks for the suggestion! I've added it to our list for triage. Also I agree that "sequence" is unclear - personally I'm a fan of "series", since it still implies that there is an order, but I haven't put that much thought into it. :)

Reply
Pablo2
0
0

Also [very minor]: the "load more" button loads 10 additional posts, but because of the three-column layout, this means that two out of three times the final line of posts will be incomplete. I think the "load more" button should instead load nine posts, or a multiple of three.

Reply
Pablo2
0
0

Yeah, I agree "series" would be more appropriate if the collected posts are ordered, though it seems that some of the "sequences" in the library are not meant to be read in any particular order.

Reply
More from Sarah Cheng
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
This morning I was looking into Switzerland's new animal welfare labelling law. I was going through the list of abuses that are now required to be documented on labels, and one of them made me do a double-take: "Frogs: Leg removal without anaesthesia."  This confused me. Why are we talking about anaesthesia? Shouldn't the frogs be dead before having their legs removed? It turns out the answer is no; standard industry practice is to cut their legs off while they are fully conscious. They remain alive and responsive for up to 15 minutes afterward. As far as I can tell, there are zero welfare regulations in any major producing country. The scientific evidence for frog sentience is robust - they have nociceptors, opioid receptors, demonstrate pain avoidance learning, and show cognitive abilities including spatial mapping and rule-based learning.  It's hard to find data on the scale of this issue, but estimates put the order of magnitude at billions of frogs annually. I could not find any organisations working directly on frog welfare interventions.  Here are the organizations I found that come closest: * Animal Welfare Institute has documented the issue and published reports, but their focus appears more on the ecological impact and population decline rather than welfare reforms * PETA has conducted investigations and released footage, but their approach is typically to advocate for complete elimination of the practice rather than welfare improvements * Pro Wildlife, Defenders of Wildlife focus on conservation and sustainability rather than welfare standards This issue seems tractable. There is scientific research on humane euthanasia methods for amphibians, but this research is primarily for laboratory settings rather than commercial operations. The EU imports the majority of traded frog legs through just a few countries such as Indonesia and Vietnam, creating clear policy leverage points. A major retailer (Carrefour) just stopped selling frog legs after welfar
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- > Why ending the worst abuses of factory farming is an issue ripe for moral reform I recently joined Dwarkesh Patel’s podcast to discuss factory farming. I hope you’ll give it a listen — and consider supporting his fundraiser for FarmKind’s Impact Fund. (Dwarkesh is matching all donations up to $250K; use the code “dwarkesh”.) We discuss two contradictory views about factory farming that produce the same conclusion: that its end is either inevitable or impossible. Some techno-optimists assume factory farming will vanish in the wake of AGI. Some pessimists see reforming it as a hopeless cause. Both camps arrive at the same conclusion: fatalism. If factory farming is destined to end, or persist, then what’s the point in fighting it? I think both views are wrong. In fact, I think factory farming sits in the ideal position for moral reform. Because its end is neither inevitable nor impossible, it offers a unique opportunity for advocacy to change the trajectory of human moral progress. Not inevitable Dwarkesh raised an objection to working on factory farming that I often hear from techno-optimists who care about the issue: isn’t its end inevitable? Some cite the long arc of moral progress; others the promise of vast technological change like cultivated meat or Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) which surpasses human capabilities. It’s true that humanity has achieved incredible moral progress for humans. But that progress was never inevitable — it was the result of moral and political reform as much as technology. And that moral progress mostly hasn’t yet extended to animals. For them, the long moral arc of history has so far only bent downward. Technology may one day end factory farming, just as cars liberated w
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
This is a personal essay about my failed attempt to convince effective altruists to become socialists. I started as a convinced socialist who thought EA ignored the 'root causes' of poverty by focusing on charity instead of structural change. After studying sociology and economics to build a rigorous case for socialism, the project completely backfired as I realized my political beliefs were largely psychological coping mechanisms. Here are the key points: * Understanding the "root cause" of a problem doesn't necessarily lead to better solutions - Even if capitalism causes poverty, understanding "dynamics of capitalism" won't necessarily help you solve it * Abstract sociological theories are mostly obscurantist bullshit - Academic sociology suffers from either unrealistic mathematical models or vague, unfalsifiable claims that don't help you understand or change the world * The world is better understood as misaligned incentives rather than coordinated oppression - Most social problems stem from coordination failures and competing interests, not a capitalist class conspiring against everyone else * Individual variation undermines class-based politics - People within the same "class" have wildly different cognitive traits, interests, and beliefs, making collective action nearly impossible * Political beliefs serve important psychological functions - They help us cope with personal limitations and maintain self-esteem, often at the expense of accuracy * Evolution shaped us for competition, not truth - Our brains prioritize survival, status, and reproduction over understanding reality or being happy * Marx's insights, properly applied, undermine the Marxist political project - His theory of ideological formation aligns with evolutionary psychology, but when applied to individuals rather than classes, it explains why the working class will not overthrow capitalism. In terms of ideas, I don’t think there’s anything too groundbreaking in this essay. A lot of the
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
34
Apply now: Group Support Grants are back!
CEA Groups Team, Jemima
· · 2m read
3
3
88
80,000 Hours for Global Development
Benh713
· · 4m read
8
8
117
What's your experience with elitism in EA? [Survey]
Q
Yi-Yang
· · 2m read
70
70
View more