Hide table of contents

Hello everyone,

I'm a 19-year-old student considering whether I should spend 4 more years in dental school in order to earn to give as a dentist to reduce AI s-risks.

The decision is complicated, but I'd isolate only one sub-question: 80,000 Hours has said that earning to give usually isn’t the best option. However, there may be only 10–20% (I'm uncertain, it may be wrong)  of aspiring EA people in AI risks getting hired or funded to do AI safety research. meaning EA people(including me) have 80% of chance to not be hired/funded.:

Many donors say they “don’t know where to spend the plentiful money,” while 80% of people still can’t get funding. That's just intuitively contradictory. If AI safety isn’t severely funding-constrained, why not lower the bar and fund more “average” projects?   

Maybe that average projects contribute far less than top projects. But if they aren’t funded, they can't do research at all, and their impact is close to 0 (unless they can contribute effectively in the non-EA world, which seems unlikely for many average people)

I’ve thought of three possible justifications:

  1. Patient philanthropy: Saving money to achieve higher leverage in the future.
  2. Backfire risks: many projects may have near-zero or negative expected value.
  3. Career capital: junior researchers should build skills before being funded (However, it seems there are also many senior AI risk people getting rejected.)

I’m eager to know what reasons I’m missing.

So my question is: What are other reasons that "Even if there is a lot of money, the funding bar should remain high and most projects should still be rejected?


As a 19 y/o who's spent 300 hours thinking about this alone, I'm hitting diminishing returns from isolated thinking. So, any outside perspective would be genuinely valuable


Please DON'T aim for a rigorous answerQuantity-over-quality brainstorming may be better—I'd prefer 1 minute half-baked thoughts or even scattered biases over silence. Even replies of only 1 short sentence “I think one reason is X”  would be extremely helpful.  (Also, feel free to criticize any of my thoughts).  Thank you very much.

14

0
0

Reactions

0
0
New Answer
New Comment

1 Answers sorted by

Many people said they wanted to work for METR. I made what I thought was a good offer: take one of the benchmarks we give AIs; if you get a good score then I guarantee that I will fly you out for an interview, even if you have no work history, have no money to pay for the trip, or any other barrier one might have to employment.

Exactly zero people took me up on this.[1]

How is it possible for there to be sky-high rejection rates yet also zero people sending me applications?

I think the answer is that raw rejection rates aren't a very useful metric. After all, an 80% rejection rate means that the AI safety jobs are 1/10th as selective as Walmart!

I would suggest ignoring raw rejection rates in favor of just looking at the criteria for the jobs you want. Particularly for something like s-risks the criteria are going to be unusual and specific, meaning that even generically qualified people will often have to dedicate substantial time to skilling up, but if you're able to do so, then your odds are pretty good.[2] 

  1. ^

    I wouldn't be surprised to learn that some people tried this, failed, and then were too embarrassed about failing to tell me. But, to the best of my recollection, literally zero people have told me that they even attempted this task.

  2. ^

    I say this even with the knowledge that you are 19. I don't want to pretend that the deck isn't stacked against younger people - it totally is - but we employ some 19 year olds, as do other AI safety orgs. If a 19 year old had sent me a good solution to that METR challenge, for example, I would have been happy to hire them.

Is this offer still open? I'll try it next weekend.

2
Ben_West🔸
I no longer work at METR. I would guess that they'd be excited about applicants who have done this, but don't want to speak for them.
Curated and popular this week
Relevant opportunities