Before, I thought: Is there need for retirement fund? I work for EA till my body can't physically afford, and after that, I think I can end my life. Because if you can't work anymore, what's the meaning of living? However, there's a flaw of this thinking, which is my question talking about:
Ideally, I plan to stay healthy and continue contributing to EA work until around age 90.
However, let’s consider a less optimistic scenario: suppose my productivity starts to decline around 65, but I can still work—say, at 50–70% capacity—until 90.
Here’s the question: who would pay me during this 65–90 period?
In most non-EA jobs (except for professors or doctors), people are typically fired or let go after 65–70 if their productivity declines.(they are forced to retire).
But for those working in EA organizations or funded through EA grants, would funders (e.g., Open Philanthropy, LTFF, etc.) still provide financial support if someone continues valuable but significantly reduced-capacity work into their 70s or 80s?
Right now, the EA community has very few elderly members, so we don’t have real examples of how this works in practice.
In short:
Will aging EAs still be paid for lower-productivity contributions? Or will they have to rely on personal retirement savings?
And if so, how should that affect how much we save for retirement during our working years?
Thanks for your replying very much, it would be very meaningful for me. Also I believe this is a neglected topic so it may. be meaningful to EA community as well
