As 2024 draws to a close, I’m reflecting on the work and stories that inspired me this year: those from the effective altruism community, those I found out about through EA-related channels, and those otherwise related to EA.
We often have high standards in effective altruism. This seems absolutely right: our work matters, so we must constantly strive to do better.
But we think that it's really important that the effective altruism community celebrate successes:
If we focus too much on failures, we incentivize others/ourselves to minimize the risk of failure, and we will probably be too risk averse.
We're humans: we're more motivated if we celebrate things that have gone well.
Rather than attempting to write a comprehensive review of this year's successes and wins related to EA, I want to share what has personally moved me this year—progress that gave me hope, individual stories and acts of altruism, and work that I found thought-provoking or valuable. I’ve structured the sections below as prompts to invite your own reflection on the year, as I’d love to hear your responses in the comments. We all have different relationships with EA ideas and the community surrounding them, and I find it valuable that we can bring different perspectives and responses to questions like these.
What progress in the world did you find exciting?
The launch of the Lead Exposure Elimination Fund this year was exciting to see, and the launch of the Partnership for a Lead-Free Future. The fund jointly committed over $100 million to combat lead exposure, compared to the $15 million in private funding that went toward lead exposure reduction in 2023. It’s encouraging to see lead poisoning receiving attention and funding after being relatively neglected.
The Open Wing Alliance reported this year that 89% of corporate cage-free commitments with deadlines of 2023 or earlier have been fulfilled—after years of hard work from advocates and animal welfare organizations. (Lewis Bollard outlines more big wins for farmed animals in 2024 in this post.)
Coinciding with the Oscars where Oppenheimer was a nominee in different categories, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) launched the “Make Nukes History” campaign. The Los Angeles Times published an open letter from NTI and many prominent actors and artists, some from the film, calling for an end to nuclear weapons. The letter and subject received media coverage from outlets like the Hollywood Reporter, the Guardian, and USA Today.
What writing from this year did you appreciate or find compelling?
“On Owning Our EA Affiliation” by @Alix Pham resonated a lot with me, as the question of how people claim their affiliation with EA or distance themselves from it comes up a lot in my work on EA communications. I appreciate the reflections and responses the post prompted in the comments, and Alix’s discussion of EA as a public good, in a sense.
I found “How I want to live my life” by @Peter Wildeford powerful in how he laid out his ideological commitments and values with clarity—it pushed me to think about what my version of a post like this would look like.
What made you grateful or excited to be involved in or related to effective altruism?
Giving What We Can celebrated its 15th anniversary this year, and founders Will MacAskill and Toby Ord posted some lovely threads on X about it. I find it wild and inspiring to consider that the actions of a small group of people 15 years ago could blossom into thousands of individuals living out their values all around the world, and I’m proud to be a part of that community through my 10% pledge.
I feel lucky to work with my colleagues at CEA—they inspire me in many ways, from their dedication to their work and their intellectual curiosity and seriousness to their Forum posts and sense of humor.
This is the third in a sequence of posts taken from my recent report: Why Did Environmentalism Become Partisan?
Summary
Rising partisanship did not make environmentalism more popular or politically effective. Instead, it saw flat or falling overall public opinion, fewer major legislative achievements, and fluctuating executive actions.
Public Opinion...
I think right now EAs might be making a significant mistake by paying insufficient attention to the political realm. As EAs we tend to figure out what’s most impactful for us to work on and focus hard. That’s great! But there are various actions that are ‘non-delegatable’ - the extent to which an individual can do the action is limited (like voting, going to a protest, making hard money contributions to particular campaigns). It might be useful if we were all more in the habit of doing variou...
New Video from AI in Context: The Fall and Rise of Sam Altman
If you want to skip straight to the video, here it is!
AI in Context is excited to be back with our fourth video! For those just hearing from us, we make videos for 80,000 Hours, telling stories about transformative AI...
Thank you Emma for your kind words! It means a lot to me to be mentioned in your post in this way.