Hide table of contents

Effective Self-Help is currently finalising a report into the most effective ways people can purchase productivity. The aim of the report is to synthesise recommendations for particularly (cost-)effective ways anyone can spend money to increase their productivity. 

We would greatly appreciate any suggestions you may have for increasing productivity, particularly anything more unique/ less well-known that you've tried. Is there something you pay for that you find highly beneficial to working effectively?

We hope that this report can be added to over time with further community suggestions and function as a master list for anyone looking to experiment with productivity solutions (such as individuals with professional development budgets from their employer).

Our research so far draws on more than 25 previous articles posted here on the Forum, on LessWrong, and elsewhere. We intend to follow this report with research into the best free productivity interventions in the near future. For more info about Effective Self-Help as a project, see our website or this post introducing our work.

Thanks for your help!

EDIT: A quick clarification that the report we're writing aims to synthesise the recommendations from all past Forum, LW, etc. posts on a similar theme into a database that can then be continually updated.

30

0
0

Reactions

0
0
New Answer
New Comment


16 Answers sorted by

I think psychotherapy is probably making me better at my job, although the impact would vary by person and by therapist.

Of course a good office environment, perhaps including renting office space or a larger apartment where you can have a separate room for quiet work, can be very effective (though also quite expensive!)

The suggestions in the comments on this post might be a helpful starting point, though they generally don't dig into the evidential basis for each suggestion.

  • A coworking space ($300/mo), or someplace which isn't your own house/bedroom, to have a better separation of work and life
  • A second monitor! Doubling my screen real estate increased my productivity by a (wild guess) 10%, easily an incredible investment. If you have a laptop, I'd recommend this portable second monitor ($250): https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B087792CQT
  • Books! Ramit Sethi has an excellent heuristic goes like "If you're thinking about buying a book, just buy it". Don't worry about finishing (or even starting!) every book you buy, just increase your own access to them to increase your expected number of book content consumed.
  • A quality microphone (eg this $100 Blue Yeti mic: https://www.amazon.com/Recording-Streaming-Patterns-Headphone-Adjustable/dp/B00N1YPXW2) if you spend more than a couple hours a week on video calls. I think 5% of why I got promoted at my last job was due to quality communication attributable to me having a streaming-tier microphone. See also: https://www.benkuhn.net/vc/

UK/European folks - if you're looking for a second monitor, I recommend you buy one of these. They usually have a  discount code, which makes them some of the best value on the market. 

The only thing to keep in mind is that they eat up your battery pretty fast, which may not be ideal if you plan to use them for long stretches away from a plug socket.

I also asked about this once here.

Yeah we need to make this a wiki entry or airtable or something so it doesn’t keep popping up without being synthesised.

3
Ben Williamson
This is the idea of what I'm writing up!  I think I could have made this clearer in the short description above but I'm trying to synthesise all the recommendations that currently exist into a database (see rough Google sheet here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1InTlwLwAKprqFeD65oF0XXz64lZTHuhBxzHDt8fqzNM/edit?usp=sharing) It seemed worth giving people a new opportunity to share any new/ further recommendations but the idea is to include everything suggested in all past posts on the same topic on the EA Forum, LessWrong, etc.

Employing a personal assistant - I understand that there was a presentation on this at the most recent EA Global conference. Also, there has been a general movement towards both acting as, and employing, personal remote assistants to support professionals with life administration and other more procedural tasks. It would be interesting to see the cost-effectiveness of this intervention. 

My hypothesis is that this would be highly effective for those professions who, a) spend a disproportionate amount of time on administrative tasks, b) the opportunity cost of their time is high, c) they are highly-focused and require deep-work time. 

I paid for a lifetime subscription to Freedom (freedom.to/), an app that blocks certain websites from your phone and computer during pre-set windows. It cost like $60 (one-time cost) and has made an extraordinary difference in my productivity.

Things my office has bought me that are well worth the money/that I will buy for myself in the future if I need to: a mouse/mousepad, a second monitor, and a good (comfortable, height-adjustable) office chair.

Somehow Freedom does not work for me, but I feel the same way about Cold Turkey (https://getcoldturkey.com/). This software is a life saver for me. 

Agreed, Cold Turkey might be the most effective software to be more productive.

If your work involves learning (or reading papers), hire a grad student in the field to tutor you (or just read the paper with you to speed up your understanding). One-on-one tutoring is dramatically more effective than most methods of learning, and you can hire tutors on sites like Wyzant for reasonable prices. Sometimes you'll even find a PhD or other expert.

Two large monitors. I'm not familiar with the research, but I vaguely recall reading something about a relationship between the "real estate" and productivity. I know that I feel so much better with enough monitor space to have 2+ programs open simultaneously, and it makes it much easer to refer to 2+ documents without opening/closing different programs.

+100 Randy Pausch also make this rec in his OG productivity video

Meditation is the thing that keeps me sane and without my sanity I'm not productive. The value of my meditation app (headspace) is immense for me. 

And as mentioned before: big/second monitor

In line with Khorton's answer, life coaching

Especially from someone within Effective Altruism, who understands one's longterm goals, having an individual to sit down with each week and talk through any and all issues is well worth the pay. When coupled with journaling, the issues that would otherwise impact one's EA work can be majorly minimized. 

Even issues that may seem small or insignificant on the surface, if they are recurring, can be extremely taxing on one's sustainable EA motivation. The life coaching widely accessed within EA needs to extend far beyond just direct aspects of the career. 

If you're interested in life coaching on better achieving your goals, romance sustained motivation, etc... feel free to DM me. I'd be happy to chat about options beyond just therapy!

Katie Glass is an EA Coach. I have not worked with her personally but I spoke with her about it during a 1:1 and she's lovely. 

1
KatieGlass
Thanks for the shout-out! :) 

Partner suggests:

  • Kitchen timer and Pomodoro technique.
  • Miro mindmapping and whiteboard app for collaborating.
  • Large format paper and colored markers for analog todo lists and long term calendars

Software (mostly free/cheap)

  • typeitforme text expansion
  • tes clipboard manager
  • Airtable
  • rectangle for organizing your screens
  • vifm (if you use the terminal, great for managing files)

Physical/hardware:

  • point lighting that illuminates the particular thing you are reading
  • ereader like Boox
  • treadmill desk/standing desk with treadmill underneath ... wobble board can also be good

“Big monitors” seems like a big win.

But it somewhat conflicts with being able to change locations, work outside or in your car, etc. I find these are also good ways to stay productive and avoid getting in a rut.

Not sure how to resolve it other than to say “have big monitors in at least one place”.

Docking station with big monitors. You can still take your laptop anywhere you want with close to 0 effort.

2
david_reinstein
True and good idea but if I’m dividing my time between 5 places I’d need monitors in all of them.
1
Miquel Banchs-Piqué (prev. mikbp)
Or not move that much! :-) More seriously, would VR googles work for that? I have never even touch one, so I really don't know how comfortable or practical to use they are, but in theory one could simulate a huge screen occupying up all the user's surroundings. 

Focusmate costs just 5 dollars per month, which is low enough to at least try it out for a while!

Beeminder could be worth trying out as well, but I haven't personally used it. Here you pay money if you don't reach your goals.

Increasing you Google Drive/Photos storage is worth the money in my opinion. It's quite cheap and you don't have to worry or think about managing your online storage that much.

I found Pavlok to be helpful for breaking a bad habit (lip-picking). I imagine it might be useful for kicking nail-biting, hair-pulling, skin-picking, and potentially smoking as well. Pretty much any bad habit that you can do repeatedly on command while zapping yourself with the watch :). 

For people who travel frequently, a lot of the travel experience can be optimized.

  • I haven't tried this but I know others who prefer sitting in the first class coach on trains. It can cost as little as £10 extra for Paddington-Oxford, and it helps them get enough elbow/laptop space to be productive.
  • Paying for wifi on flights is such an awesome deal. I can be productive for many hours for just $15-40 depending on the airline and flight duration.
  • Optimizing the airport experience is pretty straightforward. In the US, TSA Precheck and Global Entry cost ~$25/year and save you at least 10 minutes (and often an hour or more at peak times) per trip at security and immigration, respectively.
  • I also try to book flights on the same airline alliance where practical, which helps me accrue status and use business/first class lines and lounges everywhere. I estimate I save at least an hour per trip through a busy airport as a result, since I can arrive at the airport later, go from check-in to lounge/gate in 5 mins instead of 45, not wait for my boarding group, etc..
  • Depending on how much you value your time, it might be worth it to switch cabins on flights. Moving from economy to premium economy / business at check-in often costs £100/£600, respectively, for a 10+ hour flight. I know people who value their time at >£150 per hour, and the productivity gains from sleeping well on their flight would make this tradeoff worth it. You can also use credit card points for this.
  • I've tried traveling using running shoes vs other footwear. I estimate I walk at least 20% faster with running shoes on than with boots or walking shoes, based on the number of people I pass up and based on how much I beat Google Maps walking time estimates by.

Pay for all the productivity apps that you're thinking of using. Task managers like Amazing Marvin or note taking apps like Evernote are all slightly better in the paid version, and at least for me it's always been worth it. 

Around the house, spend money on shelving. Having plenty of storage space makes it easier to stay organized. 

Comments2
Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Thanks for everyone's suggestions!

[comment deleted]1
0
0
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
[Cross-posted from my Substack here] If you spend time with people trying to change the world, you’ll come to an interesting conundrum: Various advocacy groups reference previous successful social movements as to why their chosen strategy is the most important one. Yet, these groups often follow wildly different strategies from each other to achieve social change. So, which one of them is right? The answer is all of them and none of them. This is because many people use research and historical movements to justify their pre-existing beliefs about how social change happens. Simply, you can find a case study to fit most plausible theories of how social change happens. For example, the groups might say: * Repeated nonviolent disruption is the key to social change, citing the Freedom Riders from the civil rights Movement or Act Up! from the gay rights movement. * Technological progress is what drives improvements in the human condition if you consider the development of the contraceptive pill funded by Katharine McCormick. * Organising and base-building is how change happens, as inspired by Ella Baker, the NAACP or Cesar Chavez from the United Workers Movement. * Insider advocacy is the real secret of social movements – look no further than how influential the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights was in passing the Civil Rights Acts of 1960 & 1964. * Democratic participation is the backbone of social change – just look at how Ireland lifted a ban on abortion via a Citizen’s Assembly. * And so on… To paint this picture, we can see this in action below: Source: Just Stop Oil which focuses on…civil resistance and disruption Source: The Civic Power Fund which focuses on… local organising What do we take away from all this? In my mind, a few key things: 1. Many different approaches have worked in changing the world so we should be humble and not assume we are doing The Most Important Thing 2. The case studies we focus on are likely confirmation bias, where
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Are you looking for a project where you could substantially improve indoor air quality, with benefits both to general health and reducing pandemic risk? I've written a bunch about air purifiers over the past few years, and its frustrating how bad commercial market is. The most glaring problem is the widespread use of HEPA filters. These are very effective filters that, unavoidably, offer significant resistance to air flow. HEPA is a great option for filtering air in single pass, such as with an outdoor air intake or a biosafety cabinet, but it's the wrong set of tradeoffs for cleaning the air that's already in the room. Air passing through a HEPA filter removes 99.97% of particles, but then it's mixed back in with the rest of the room air. If you can instead remove 99% of particles from 2% more air, or 90% from 15% more air, you're delivering more clean air. We should compare in-room purifiers on their Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR), not whether the filters are HEPA. Next is noise. Let's say you do know that CADR is what counts, and you go looking at purifiers. You've decided you need 250 CFM, and you get something that says it can do that. Except once it's set up in the room it's too noisy and you end up running it on low, getting just 75 CFM. Everywhere I go I see purifiers that are either set too low to achieve much or are just switched off. High CADR with low noise is critical. Then consider filter replacement. There's a competitive market for standardized filters, where most HVAC systems use one of a small number of filter sizes. Air purifiers, though, just about always use their own custom filters. Some of this is the mistaken insistence on HEPA filters, but I suspect there's also a "cheap razors, expensive blades" component where manufacturers make their real money on consumables. Then there's placement. Manufacturers put the buttons on the top and send air upwards, because they're designing them to sit on the floor. But a purifier on the floor takes up
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
[Note: I (the primary author) am writing this entirely in a personal capacity. Funding for the bounty and donations mentioned in this post comes entirely from personal savings and the generosity of friends and family. Colleagues at Open Philanthropy (my employer) reviewed this post at my request, but this project is completely unaffiliated with Open Philanthropy.]   In 2023, GiveWell reported that it received over $250M from more than 30,000 donors, excluding Open Philanthropy. I expect (though haven’t confirmed) that at least $50M of this came from unmatched retail donations, meaning from individuals who don’t work at a company that offers a donation match. I can’t help but hope that there may be some way to offer these donors a source of matching funds that wouldn’t otherwise go toward charitable causes. Over the last couple of years, friends and I have spent >100 hours looking into potential legal, collaborative corporate donation matching opportunities. I think there may be promising ways to partner with corporate donors, but I haven’t found a way forward that I am comfortable with, and I don’t think I’m the best person to continue work on this project. Some donors may be choosing to give through surrogates (friends who work at companies that match donations) without understanding the risks involved. My understanding is that there can be several (particularly if donors send surrogates money conditionally, e.g., by asking them to sign an agreement to give through their company’s match): * The surrogate might inadvertently violate their company’s terms for donation matching. * The surrogate, donor, or company might fail an IRS audit if they don’t correctly report the donations + match. * The surrogate or donor might be sued by the company. * The company might discontinue its matching program and/or claw back funds from recipient nonprofits. “Getting to yes” with a corporate partner in a completely legal, transparent, and good faith way could direct signi