The new CMIP7 emissions scenarios are out for the IPCC's seventh assessment report (AR7). See the CarbonBrief explainer for a full breakdown.
Notable changes:
The highest 8.5 scenario was dropped and the now "high" scenario has much less warming
Much of this is because of climate policy and low cost tech; high coal use for electricity is no longer plausible given the low cost of renewables and batteries
No baseline scenario; instead they show less/current/more climate policy, with a medium scenario with current policy at around 2.9°C of warming
Scenarios still depend on a lot of carbon-dioxide removal that hasn't scaled yet
The lowest (1.5°C) and highest (4°C+) scenarios are less feasible. That's mixed news - less chance of the worst case scenarios, but also means we are more likely to still have disruptive ~2.5-3°C warming.
Crossposted to Less Wrong
‘Like most of life’s dangers, the dangers of artificial intelligence are not easily identified from the armchair.’
J Dmitri Gallow
Epistemic status
I’m not an expert in this field, and herein I make some sweeping generalisations educated guesses about the overall...
TL;DR: EA has traditionally deprioritized climate change as a cause area. But a new report from Rethink Priorities, an EA research institute, suggests that specific Earth systems risks driven by climate change could have mortality impacts comparable to major global health burdens, on top of the known damages of climate change.
The report finds that research and governance work on ‘Earth Systems Stabilization’ to establish whether safe options to address th...