Dumb question: people use Prolific because it's cheaper than Ipsos. Do you have an estimate for how much cheaper it is?

This write up was like your organisation of the conference: clear, efficient, honest, helpful and supportive, overall very high ROI. Thank you both for your incredible work this year. Our community it so lucky to have you.

Where did this project end up? Any public results?

How do you feel about this framework?

Amazing. Thank you!

Yes all data and code are on the osf, but to my chagrin they’re in spss. Yes good observation re the strawberry, and the imprecision around the outcome.

Our project took approximately 2 weeks FTE for 3 people (most was parallelisable). Probably the best reference class.

Richard I really love your writing, but as a parent I find it so hard to just sit and read stuff. 95% of the forum's content I get via the podcast feeds. Now, I don't expect everyone to go full Experimental History or Joe Carlsmith and audio narrate each post, but unless you're wanting to keep things on Substack turf, you might consider cross-posting the full thing here (like Bentham's Bulldog did for the critique of the wired article). I don't ask this of everyone, so please consider this a compliment: I love your work and want it in my ears.^[1] 

1. ^{^}

   That sounded weirder than I meant it to

Hanania gives some interesting arguments for why here: https://www.richardhanania.com/p/effective-altruism-thinks-youre-hitler

One lens to look at this is less through the ‘we’re all similarly qualified’ like the AMA but more through the ‘we’re working with the same values’ or ‘we’re working on similar problems’ like the Institute of Public Administration Australia. These have no qualification requirements. Still they offer similar things to what ea communities try to do https://qld.ipaa.org.au/for-individuals/