My ratings and reviews of rationalist fiction
I've dedicated far too much time to reading rationalist fiction. This is a list of stories I think are good enough to recommend.
Here's my entire rationalist fiction bookshelf —a mix of works written explicitly within the genre and other works that still seem to belong. (I've written reviews for some, but not all.)
Here are subcategories, with stories ranked in rough order from "incredible" to "good". The stories vary widely in scale, tone, etc., and you should probably just read whatever seems most interesting to you.
If you know of a good rational or rational-adjacent story I'm missing, let me know!
Long stories (rational fiction)
- Worm
- Worth the Candle
- Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality
- Pale
- The Steerswoman (series)
- The Erogamer (warning: X-rated)
- My Little Pony: Friendship is Optimal
- The Gods Are Bastards
- Dr. Stone
- Significant Digits (HPMOR sequel)
- A Practical Guide to Evil
- Pokemon: The Origin of Species
- The Last Ringbearer
- Unsong
- Fine Structure
- Luminosity
- Ra
Long stories (not rational fiction, but close)
- The Dark Forest (second book of a trilogy, other books are good but not as close to rational fiction)
- The Diamond Age
- Red Plenty
- Strong Female Protagonist
- Spinning Silver
- Ender's Shadow
- Blindsight
- The Great Brain (series, quality is consistent)
- The Traitor Baru Cormorant
- The Martian
- Anathem
Short stories and novellas (rational or close)
- Most of Alicorn's work (generally not on Goodreads, so not rated there). Currently the best working rationalist fiction author, IMO.
- Friendship is Optimal (spinoff stories)
- The Metropolitan Man
- The Rules of Wishing
- The Dark Wizard of Donkerk
- It Looks Like You're Trying To Take Over The World
- The Thrilling Adventures of Lovelace and Babbage
- A Wizard's Guide to Defensive Baking
- The Sword of Good
- The Dark Lord's Answer
- A Girl Corrupted by the Internet is the Summoned Hero?

TIL: In 1971, Mario Pierre Roymans stole a Vermeer painting and tried to ransom it for a donation to starving Bengali refugees. It's an interesting example of naive altruistic utilitarianism before EA — inspired by the same famine that led Peter Singer to write "Famine, Affluence, and Morality".
(Roymans was apprehended and spent six months in prison; no ransom was paid. )
Why do you think it was naive instead of a good bet that happened to not work out?
Maybe "naive" isn't the right language -- I mean it mostly in the sense of "it's a bad idea to commit crimes in the service of charity" rather than "the expected value was negative".
If Mario cared sufficiently little about being imprisoned, damaging a masterpiece, or generating opposition to famine relief writ large, I could see the theft as a positive-EV move from his perspective. But on the "benefit" side of the tradeoff, I'm skeptical that there was even a remote possibility of the Belgian government putting up ~$17 million to ransom the painting, especially on the deadline he set. (Claude notes that governments have a strong incentive not to set a precedent by making public ransom payments.)
That said, when I did some more reading on the case, I saw this:
So it may have been a surprisingly effective publicity stunt, if the public's reactions were really so positive! (That's not something I'd expect in the modern world.)
But I continue to think it's generally misguided to steal money so you can give it away,* for reasons including "I wouldn't want someone to steal my money for their own favorite charity" and "if your cause is known for support from thieves, you should expect people to turn against it".
*But if you can steal bread to feed your starving child, why not someone else's children? As the guy who played Javert in my high school's production of Les Mis, I can't help thinking about Jean Valjean here. But I'm not inclined to spend the time I'd need to work through the relevant arguments and counterarguments.
I would have predicted the positive press and basically think this would "work" today if these conditions were met:
I agree you on the overall downsides though. This sets a bad precedent that will be misused by many and burn a ton of social trust that is ultimately more important.