EA Forum Bot Site
EA Forum

Comment Permalink
Marcus Daniell7
0
0

Did you try?
I just tried it myself: followed three accounts in 17 seconds (having lost a couple of seconds in starting my stopwatch), which gave me 1m43s to think about my network and whether it includes athletes. 
Also open to alternate headlines, e.g. Two tiny requests from HIA, A Variable Amount of your Time Depending on your Click Speed, Network Size, and Desire to Spend Time on the Task.

Reply
See in context
by Marcus Daniell
2 min read 10

88

CommunityHigh Impact Athletes (organization)Requests (open)
Frontpage

High Impact Athletes’ theory of change relies on using the collective athlete megaphone to convince a large percentage of the world’s high-income population to donate to cost-effective charities. Using our athletes’ voices and platforms we aim to raise the global profile of these giving opportunities and the philosophies behind them.

Sports fans are numerous, and the cultural clout of athletes has grown rapidly over the last century. According to MIT Media Lab, athletes made up 50% of all “historical cultural figures” between 1950 - 2000. We can use this influence to spread EA-aligned ideas. 

In 18 months, HIA has grown from zero to over 110 athletes, with 46 of those athletes making at least a 1% pledge. Our second order audience (the amount of people we can reach through our athletes) is over 10.7 million, and we’re growing those numbers weekly. 

The more big (popular) athletes we have on the HIA athlete roster, the louder the athlete megaphone, and the more people we can influence towards EA ideas. 

To recruit bigger athletes we need standalone credibility as an organisation, particularly if we don’t have an existing personal connection. A large part of being credible in the athlete/influencer space is how big your social media following is. 

This is where we’d love the EA community’s help. 


Task 1
Please take 30 seconds out of your day to follow our Instagram, Twitter and Facebook accounts. Then if you’re feeling particularly generous please take another 60 seconds to ask your friends to do the same!

More followers means more algorithm love, which might be the push that gets our posts noticed by prospective athletes. This is a low cost but potentially impactful action that each of you can take today!

Potential Questions:

Why don’t you just buy followers?
We could, but these accounts are easy to spot and so the risk to our credibility/reward ratio isn’t great. We also want engagement with our account, and bought followers don’t engage the same way that organic ones do. We haven’t completely ruled this out (the ends might justify the means) but we want to see how far we can get organically first.

Why does social media matter?
It’s the most common place where athletes interact with their fans - particularly Instagram. This interaction is where we have the largest potential to create change. Influencing 1% of 1 big athlete’s following could mean tens of thousands of people introduced to EA ideas for the first time. 

Do you have growth plans other than asking individuals to follow your channels?
In short, yes. We are working hard to increase engagement on our own channels and also build our second-order audience. However a small nudge from this supportive community would help a bunch.


Task 2
Spend some time thinking if you, or anyone you know, knows any professional athletes or employees working in the sporting space. If you do, please introduce them to me at marcus@highimpactathletes.org - warm introductions are the fastest and most organic way to grow, and each athlete adds momentum to the HIA snowball. 

I want to shout out 80,000 Hours and their employees for having passed on some athletes from their career advising program.

Cheers, 
Marcus and the HIA team.


 

88

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments10


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Guy Raveh87
0
0

Why don’t you just buy followers? We could... We haven’t completely ruled this out (the ends might justify the means)

Just saying I think this would be a terrible idea, both for HIA and for the movement in general. We very obviously don't want to be associated with lying and manufacturing support. Not to mention it might just get you banned from social media.

Reply
EdMathieu33
0
0

Strong-upvoting this. The way you could decide to invest money into expanding your social media reach would be to properly sponsor your account through ads on IG/Tw/FB. These platforms allow for precise targeting based on demographics and interests – and given the specific scope of HIA, I imagine that designing good targets would be easy enough.

Reply
Marcus Daniell1
0
0

Fair point, thanks.

Reply
Kirsten18
0
0

Okay, I'm just gonna come out and say it: there's no way I could complete both of these requests in two minutes and every time I see the headline it drives me crazy!

Reply
Marcus Daniell7
0
0

Did you try?
I just tried it myself: followed three accounts in 17 seconds (having lost a couple of seconds in starting my stopwatch), which gave me 1m43s to think about my network and whether it includes athletes. 
Also open to alternate headlines, e.g. Two tiny requests from HIA, A Variable Amount of your Time Depending on your Click Speed, Network Size, and Desire to Spend Time on the Task.

Reply
Charles He3
0
0

Ok. I guess this comment is a little argumentative and not the highest signal to noise but:

I can see how someone who hasn’t used their social media in a while, need time to login, unjig their password manager, agree to the latest privacy policy, etc. which takes several minutes.

Also, it seems like many introduction emails take more than 2 minutes to write, especially if you haven’t spoken to that person in a while or they are loosely connected.

Reply
Marcus Daniell3
0
0

Totally. I'm being very tongue in cheek above. 
The gist of the headline and the post is that community members can contribute to a potentially highly impactful project with a very trivial amount of time and energy spend.
I very much agree that good intros take time.

Reply
Charles He2
0
0

Yes, of course, that's fair. I guess it can be difficult to communicate tone online.

Reply
jared_m17
0
0

Done, re: following on Twitter.

My main contact at Pau and Marc Gasol's Gasol Foundation (focused on "research, holistic, data-driven" work to eradicate childhood obesity) appears to have left. They are a thoughtful group, and may be worth writing in the 10-20% chance they evolve into HIA supporters — or can be helpful in another way.

Reply
gergo7
0
0

Following on FB now!

You could also ask people running EA national/city pages to share your page - that way it could reach some more EAs and EA sympathetic folks!

Reply
More from Marcus Daniell
179
Introducing High Impact Athletes
Marcus Daniell
· · 1m read
60
60
119
Are there any other pro athlete aspiring EAs?
Q
Marcus Daniell
· · 1m read
51
51
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
This is Part 1 of a multi-part series, shared as part of Career Conversations Week. The views expressed here are my own and don't reflect those of my employer. TL;DR: Building an EA-aligned career starting from an LMIC comes with specific challenges that shaped how I think about career planning, especially around constraints: * Everyone has their own "passport"—some structural limitation that affects their career more than their abilities. The key is recognizing these constraints exist for everyone, just in different forms. Reframing these from "unfair barriers" to "data about my specific career path" has helped me a lot. * When pursuing an ideal career path, it's easy to fixate on what should be possible rather than what actually is. But those idealized paths often require circumstances you don't have—whether personal (e.g., visa status, financial safety net) or external (e.g., your dream org hiring, or a stable funding landscape). It might be helpful to view the paths that work within your actual constraints as your only real options, at least for now. * Adversity Quotient matters. When you're working on problems that may take years to show real progress, the ability to stick around when the work is tedious becomes a comparative advantage. Introduction Hi, I'm Rika. I was born and raised in the Philippines and now work on hiring and recruiting at the Centre for Effective Altruism in the UK. This post might be helpful for anyone navigating the gap between ambition and constraint—whether facing visa barriers, repeated setbacks, or a lack of role models from similar backgrounds. Hearing stories from people facing similar constraints helped me feel less alone during difficult times. I hope this does the same for someone else, and that you'll find lessons relevant to your own situation. It's also for those curious about EA career paths from low- and middle-income countries—stories that I feel are rarely shared. I can only speak to my own experience, but I hop
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
And other ways to make event content more valuable.   I organise and attend a lot of conferences, so the below is correct and need not be caveated based on my experience, but I could be missing some angles here. Also on my substack. When you imagine a session at an event going wrong, you’re probably thinking of the hapless, unlucky speaker. Maybe their slides broke, they forgot their lines, or they tripped on a cable and took the whole stage backdrop down. This happens sometimes, but event organizers usually remember to invest the effort required to prevent this from happening (e.g., checking that the slides work, not leaving cables lying on the stage). But there’s another big way that sessions go wrong that is sorely neglected: wasting everyone’s time, often without people noticing. Let’s give talks a break. They often suck, but event organizers are mostly doing the right things to make them not suck. I’m going to pick on two event formats that (often) suck, why they suck, and how to run more useful content instead. Panels Panels. (very often). suck. Reid Hoffman (and others) have already explained why, but this message has not yet reached a wide enough audience: Because panelists know they'll only have limited time to speak, they tend to focus on clear and simple messages that will resonate with the broadest number of people. The result is that you get one person giving you an overly simplistic take on the subject at hand. And then the process repeats itself multiple times! Instead of going deeper or providing more nuance, the panel format ensures shallowness. Even worse, this shallow discourse manifests as polite groupthink. After all, panelists attend conferences for the same reasons that attendees do – they want to make connections and build relationships. So panels end up heavy on positivity and agreement, and light on the sort of discourse which, through contrasting opinions and debate, could potentially be more illuminating. The worst form of shal
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
Confidence Level: I’ve been an organizer at UChicago for over a year now with my co-organizer, Avik. I also started the UChicago Rationality Group, co-organized a 50-person Midwest EA Retreat, and have spoken to many EA organizers from other universities. A lot of this post is based on vibes and conversations with other organizers, so while it's grounded in experience, some parts are more speculative than others. I’ll try to flag the more speculative points when I can (the * indicates points that I’m less certain about).  I think it’s really important to make sure that EA principles persist in the future. To give one framing for why I believe this: if you think EA is likely to significantly reduce the chances of existential risks, you should think that losing EA is itself a factor significantly contributing to existential risks.  Therefore, I also think one of the most important ways to have a large impact in university (and in general) is to organize/start a university EA group.  Impact Through Force Multiplication 1. Scope – It's easy to be scope insensitive with respect to movement building and creating counterfactual EAs, but a few counterfactual EAs potentially means millions of dollars going to either direct work or effective charities. Getting one more cracked EA involved can potentially double your impact! 1. According to this post from 2021 by the Uni Groups Team: “Assuming a 20% discount rate, a 40 year career, and $2 million of additional value created per year per highly engaged Campus Centre alumnus, ten highly engaged Campus Centre alumni would produce around $80 million of net present value. The actual number is lower, because of counterfactuals.” It should be noted that campus centre alumni is referring to numbers estimated from these schools. 2. They also included an anecdote of a potential near-best-case scenario that I think is worth paraphrasing: The 2015 Stanford EA group included: Redwood CEO Buck Shlegeris, OpenPhil Program Direct
Recent opportunities in Community
19
Free 1-on-1 Tutoring Opportunity
Niklas Lehmann
· · 2m read
0
0
86
80,000 Hours for Global Development
Benh713
· · 4m read
7
7
50
AMA with recruiters at impact-focused orgs
Career Week
Calum, Judith Rensing, Rika Gabriel, Dee Kathuria+ 2 more
· · 1m read
51
51
View more