Take the 2025 EA Forum Survey to help inform our strategy and prioritiesTake the survey
Hide table of contents
4 min read 22

122

What the program is about[1]

Effective altruism (EA) is an ongoing project to find the best ways to do good, and put them into practice. 

Our core goal with this program is to introduce you to some of the principles and thinking tools behind effective altruism. We hope that these tools can help you as you think through how you can best help the world.

We also want to share some of the arguments for working on specific problems, like global health or biosecurity. People involved in effective altruism tend to agree that, partly due to uncertainty about which cause is best, we should split our resources between problems. But they don’t agree on what that split should be. People in the effective altruism community actively discuss and disagree about which causes to prioritize and how, even though we’ve learned a lot over the last decade. We hope that you will take these ideas seriously and think for yourself about which ways to help are most effective.

Finally, we give you some time at the end of the program to begin to reflect on how you personally can help to solve these problems. We don’t expect you’ll have an answer by the end of the eight weeks, but we hope you’re better prepared to explore this further.

What the program involves

Each part of the program has a set of core posts and sometimes an exercise. 

We think that the core posts take most people about 1-2 hours to get through, and the exercise another 30-60 minutes. We have matched the readings and exercises so that, in total, we think it will take around 2-2.5 hours per week to prepare for the weekly session.

The exercises help you put the concepts from the reading into practice.

Beyond the core posts, there are more materials each week in ‘More to Explore’ — these are all optional and explore the themes of the week in more depth and breadth. 

Approximate reading times are given for each of the posts. Generally, we’d prefer you to take your time and think through the readings instead of rushing.

This curriculum was drawn up by staff from the Centre for Effective Altruism, incorporating feedback from others. Ultimately we had to make many judgement calls, and other people would have drawn up a different curriculum.[2]

How we hope you’ll approach the program

Taking ideas seriously

Often, conversations about ideas are recreational: we enjoy batting around interesting thoughts and saying smart things, and then go back to doing whatever we were already doing in our lives. This is a fine thing to do — but at least sometimes, we think we should be asking ourselves questions like: 

  • “How could I tell if this idea was true?”
  • “What evidence would it take to convince me that I was wrong about an idea?”
  • “If it is true, what does that imply I should be doing differently in my life? What else does it imply I’m wrong about?”
  • “How might this impact my plans for my career/life?”

And, zooming out: 

  • “Where are my blind spots?”
  • “Which important questions should I be thinking about that I’m not?”
  • “Do I really know if this idea/plan will help make things better or not?”

Answering these questions can help make our worldviews as accurate and full as possible and, by extension, help us make better decisions about things that we care about.

Disagreements are useful

When thoughtful people with access to the same information reach very different conclusions from each other, we should be curious about why and we should actively encourage people to voice and investigate where those disagreements are coming from. If, for example, a medical community is divided on whether Treatment A or B does a better job of curing some disease, they should want to get to the bottom of that disagreement, because the right answer matters — lives are at stake. If you start off disagreeing with someone then change your mind, that can be hard to admit, but we think that should be celebrated. Helping conversations become clearer by changing your mind in response to arguments you find compelling will help the community act to save lives more effectively  Even if you don’t expect to end up agreeing with the other person, you’ll learn more if you acknowledge that you disagree and try to understand exactly how and why their views disagree with yours.

Be aware of our privilege and the seriousness of these issues

We shouldn’t lose sight of our privilege in being able to read and discuss these ideas, or that we are talking about real lives. We’re lucky to be in a position where we can have such a large impact, and this opportunity for impact is the consequence of a profoundly unequal world. Also, be conscious of the fact that people in this program come to these discussions with different ideas, backgrounds, and knowledge. Some of these topics can be uncomfortable to talk about — which is one of the reasons they’re so neglected, and so important to talk about — especially when we may have personal ties to some of these areas.

Explore further

This handbook aims to introduce people to effective altruism in a structured manner. There are far too many relevant topics, ideas, and research for all but a small fraction of them to fit into this very short program. If you are interested in these topics, you may find it very useful to dive into the linked websites, and the websites those sites link to, and so on.

 

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 

  1. ^

    This handbook is also accessible as a Google Doc version here 

  2. ^

     Our goal is to introduce people to some of the core principles of effective altruism, to share the arguments for different problems that people in effective altruism work on, and to encourage you to think about what you want to do on the basis of those ideas. We also tried to give a balance of materials that is in line with the (significant) diversity of views on these topics within effective altruism. 

    In drawing up the curriculum, we consulted community members, subject matter experts, and program facilitators.

    We think that these readings are interesting and give a good introduction, but we hope that you engage with them critically, rather than taking them all at face value. Once you’ve read this curriculum, we encourage you to explore other EA writings (e.g. on this wiki).

Comments22


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Thank you, EA, this introduction has really grabbed my attention and set the stage for what is to come! I am looking forward to finding best ways to do good and put them into practice.

I already sense that this is going to be a great experience after my Introductory EA Fellowship program with EA-Nigeria

Thank you for putting this together

Very well structured, and a big thank you from our auditory leaners! :)

Thank you for putting this together! I was struck by this sentence: "We’re lucky to be in a position where we can have such a large impact, and this opportunity for impact is the consequence of a profoundly unequal world." I have been thinking about this a lot, and whether, by eliminating inequalities we could reach a time where effective altruism might be substantially less relevant (or, in other words, in an ideal world, effective altruism wouldn't exist). Lots of food for thought. 

This statement has really stuck with me and shall be a guiding factor in many of the conversations I hold with people henceforth: "When thoughtful people with access to the same information reach very different conclusions from each other, we should be curious about why and we should actively encourage people to voice and investigate where those disagreements are coming from"

This is really cool, love how structured and well laid out this is with a journey for people like me who don't quite have time to commit to a course but are happy to tune in and out as available. 

Thanks for a very structured and specific approach with materials to help others start later like me to start to do good better. Thanks the EA team!

I appreciate these writing!

I like the wording of "Be aware of our privilege and the seriousness of these issues". I think that sections encapsulated what this is about and what attracted me to the movement.

Thanks, EA team for the information, looking forward to learning more

This is my first time of every engaging with the concept of EA. I am keeping an open mind and have come to this programme to learn. I will be open to question truths and knowledge i have known and held close to my heart over time. I would be open to new ideas, fresh thinking, and even hard truths. I seem to like the way the programme is structured to allow freshers like us build our confidence with this new thinking and philosopy.

I am excited by the prospects of this vision and I am curious as I learn more how different cultures internalize these values in reference to their ancestral wisdom and indigenous beliefs. There are countless human philosophies around the earth that live in harmony with their land and sustainably and abundantly provide for their communities. It appears that cultures and nations who recently dominated and decimated similar sustainable ways of living, in search for profit, expansion of power, etc. are the cultures trying to provide support and charity toward the people and lands whom they actively extract value from. I am uncertain if this power dynamic is effectively captured in the concepts of "privilege and seriousness of these issues". I am seeking to find the truth and looking forward to conversations with those who disagree and those who recognize the seriousness of unconditional reparations as a form of decolonization. 

Thank you, Anthony, for your very thoughtful comment. I live in a white community in the western US where there was a forced march of Indigenous people from their ancestral homeland to the reservation. Recently the local government has been renaming landmarks, including a bridge over which they were forced, with names in that language. This strikes me as something to assuage white guilt and excuse us from taking real action, like the unconditional reparations you mention. I wonder if this is in the same vein as the question you raise here.

"We shouldn’t lose sight of our privilege in being able to read and discuss these ideas, or that we are talking about real lives. We’re lucky to be in a position where we can have such a large impact..." Sometimes I feel as though I am one to lose sight of the privilege I have to ponder and discuss these ideas. The EA team makes me genuinely excited about the change and impact I can potentially make, and for that, I give them a big thanks!

We shouldn’t lose sight of our privilege in being able to read and discuss these ideas, or that we are talking about real lives. We’re lucky to be in a position where we can have such a large impact, and this opportunity for impact is the consequence of a profoundly unequal world.

 

Indeed very grateful to embark on this journey and extremely excited to go through EA in a structured manner :)

 

If you start off disagreeing with someone then change your mind, that can be hard to admit, but we think that should be celebrated. Helping conversations become clearer by changing your mind in response to arguments you find compelling will help the community act to save lives more effectively

 

To add to this (for those who think Charity Entrepreneurship could be a career option), this is from How to Launch a High-Impact Nonprofit book page 35:

Feedback loops and openness to criticism allow you to change your mind and grow your organization. This requires a rare willingness to admit mistakes. Cultivate a "scout mindset," trying to understand situations and concepts as honestly and accurately as possible, even when inconvenient. Remember, changing your mind is the ultimate victory, because in those moments you are improving your model of the world and making your charity better.

Awesome. One thing is always very key to life, which is; we shouldn't trivialize every little opportunity (s) we found ourselves in making positive impacts. Thank you all @ EA team

Sometimes we think there are no other ways to do something, but we must ask ourselves and try to change in order to help people.

"If you start off disagreeing with someone then change your mind, that can be hard to admit, but we think that should be celebrated."

This is hard and scary to do depending on the situation. I am starting to notice more when I change my mind and how it feels.

This handbook alone reveals how exciting the program is going to be: a chance to explore and reflect on the world's biggest causes with others will develop critical thinking skills and introduce new insights and ideas.

I personally enjoy the part of this reading that calls us to take all presented ideas seriously and not take anything to heart without intentional forethought.

Thank you for taking your precious time to organize this handbook and make other effective altruists' lives easier! May all sentient beings be directly or indirectly benefited! 

Specifically under  "Be aware of our privilege and the seriousness of these issues". I'm inclined to believe that this section entails  what this is about and that's one of the core reasons why I got interested.

The handbook demonstrates the immense thrill that the program if about to offer. It is a very great opportunity to take a journey to learn about effective altruism and start the practical work of applying what we discuss into our lives. It presents an opportunity to collectively delve into and contemplate the most significant global issues. This experience will foster the growth of essential analytical abilities while also presenting novel perspectives and concepts. 

I would like to extend my warmest thanks to the EA team for all of their work, and for providing such a perfect content. 

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
This morning I was looking into Switzerland's new animal welfare labelling law. I was going through the list of abuses that are now required to be documented on labels, and one of them made me do a double-take: "Frogs: Leg removal without anaesthesia."  This confused me. Why are we talking about anaesthesia? Shouldn't the frogs be dead before having their legs removed? It turns out the answer is no; standard industry practice is to cut their legs off while they are fully conscious. They remain alive and responsive for up to 15 minutes afterward. As far as I can tell, there are zero welfare regulations in any major producing country. The scientific evidence for frog sentience is robust - they have nociceptors, opioid receptors, demonstrate pain avoidance learning, and show cognitive abilities including spatial mapping and rule-based learning.  It's hard to find data on the scale of this issue, but estimates put the order of magnitude at billions of frogs annually. I could not find any organisations working directly on frog welfare interventions.  Here are the organizations I found that come closest: * Animal Welfare Institute has documented the issue and published reports, but their focus appears more on the ecological impact and population decline rather than welfare reforms * PETA has conducted investigations and released footage, but their approach is typically to advocate for complete elimination of the practice rather than welfare improvements * Pro Wildlife, Defenders of Wildlife focus on conservation and sustainability rather than welfare standards This issue seems tractable. There is scientific research on humane euthanasia methods for amphibians, but this research is primarily for laboratory settings rather than commercial operations. The EU imports the majority of traded frog legs through just a few countries such as Indonesia and Vietnam, creating clear policy leverage points. A major retailer (Carrefour) just stopped selling frog legs after welfar
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- > Why ending the worst abuses of factory farming is an issue ripe for moral reform I recently joined Dwarkesh Patel’s podcast to discuss factory farming. I hope you’ll give it a listen — and consider supporting his fundraiser for FarmKind’s Impact Fund. (Dwarkesh is matching all donations up to $250K; use the code “dwarkesh”.) We discuss two contradictory views about factory farming that produce the same conclusion: that its end is either inevitable or impossible. Some techno-optimists assume factory farming will vanish in the wake of AGI. Some pessimists see reforming it as a hopeless cause. Both camps arrive at the same conclusion: fatalism. If factory farming is destined to end, or persist, then what’s the point in fighting it? I think both views are wrong. In fact, I think factory farming sits in the ideal position for moral reform. Because its end is neither inevitable nor impossible, it offers a unique opportunity for advocacy to change the trajectory of human moral progress. Not inevitable Dwarkesh raised an objection to working on factory farming that I often hear from techno-optimists who care about the issue: isn’t its end inevitable? Some cite the long arc of moral progress; others the promise of vast technological change like cultivated meat or Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) which surpasses human capabilities. It’s true that humanity has achieved incredible moral progress for humans. But that progress was never inevitable — it was the result of moral and political reform as much as technology. And that moral progress mostly hasn’t yet extended to animals. For them, the long moral arc of history has so far only bent downward. Technology may one day end factory farming, just as cars liberated w
 ·  · 3m read
 · 
We’re already in the second half of 2025 and there are still an incredible number of EAGx and Summit events coming up, as well as the first ever EA Global: New York City. We’re so excited to continue watching the EA community connect and grow.  Below is our conference schedule for the rest of the year. We’re supporting the first EAGx in Brazil, and inaugural EA conferences in France, Vietnam, New Zealand, and Turkey. We hope to reach more people than ever before. Please spread the word, especially for events happening near you!  We are also eager to initiate new events; if you’d like to apply to run an EAGx or Summit in 2026, please fill out this form! Apply to run an EAGx or EA Summit in 2026 Upcoming EA conferences EA Global * EA Global: New York City (10–12 Oct) | Applications close September 28—apply now! EAGx * EAGxSãoPaulo (22–24 Aug) | Applications just extended until August 18—apply now! * EAGxBerlin (3–5 Oct) | Applications close September 7 * EAGxSingapore (15–16 Nov) Applications close October 20 * EAGxAustralasia (28–30 Nov) | Applications close November 9 * EAGxAmsterdam (12–14 Dec) | Applications close November 23 * EAGxIndia (13–14 Dec) | Applications close November 30 EA Summits * EA Summit: Paris (13 Sep 2025) | Applications close September 9 * EA Summit: Vancouver (19–20 Sep) | Applications close September 15 * EA Summit: Vietnam (20 Sep) | Applications close September 12 * EA Summit: Philippines (27 Sep) | Applications close August 20 * EA Summit: New Zealand (27 Sep) | Applications close September 12 * EA Summit: South Africa (11 Oct) | Applications close October 4 * EA Summit: Istanbul (18 Oct) | Applications close October 18 Tentative events that have not yet been confirmed:  * EA Summit: Bogota (Nov) * EA Summit: Los Angeles (22 Nov) What is the difference between EA Global, EAGx, and EA Summits? * EA Global (EAG) conferences are for people with a firm grasp of EA principles who are taking, or planning to take,
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism