Good writeup!
Pathways is another online treatment program. There are also workbooks like The Pain Management Workbook.
Good writeup!
Pathways is another online treatment program. There are also workbooks like The Pain Management Workbook.
I had really good success with the book Stop Beings Your Symptoms, Start Being Yourself.
I still have my chronic mystery ailment, but it reduced its impact on my life by about 80%.
Executive summary: This exploratory post argues that "neuroplastic pain"—pain generated by learned neural patterns rather than tissue damage—is a widely accepted explanation for many chronic pain conditions, yet remains underrecognized in mainstream medicine; the author shares personal experiences of dramatic improvement through psychological treatments, suggesting these may offer substantial relief for a broad range of patients.
Key points:
This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.
I haven't looked into this literature, but it sounds remarkably similar to the literature of cognitive behavioral therapy and graded exercise therapy for ME/CFS (also sometimes referred to as 'chronic fatigue syndrome'). I can imagine this being different for pain which could be under more direct neurological control.
Pretty much universally, this research was of low to very low quality. For example, using overly broad inclusion criteria such that many patients did not have the core symptom of ME/CFS, and only reporting subjective scores (which tend to improve) while not reporting objective scores. These treatments are also pretty much impossible to blind. Non-blinding + subjective self-report is a pretty bad combination. This, plus the general amount of bad research practices in science, gives me a skeptical prior.
Regarding the value of anecdotes - over the past couple of years as ME/CFS patient (presumably from covid) I've seen remission anecdotes for everything under the sun. They're generally met with enthusiasm and a wave of people trying it, with ~no one being able te replicate it. I suspect that "I cured my condition X psychologically" is often a more prevalent story because 1) it's tried so often, and 2) it's an especially viral meme. Not because it has a higher succes rate than a random supplement. The reality is that spontaneous remission for any condition seems not extremely unlikely, and it's actually very hard to trace effects to causes (which is why even for effective drugs, we need large-scale highly rigorous trials).
Lastly, ignoring symptoms can be pretty dangerous so I recommend caution with the approach and approach it like you would any other experimental treatment.
Epistemic status: Amateur synthesis of medical research that is still recent but now established enough to make it into modern medical textbooks. Some specific claims vary in evidence strength. I’ve spent ~20-30 hours studying the literature and treatment approaches, which were very effective for me.
Disclaimer: I'm not a medical professional. This information is educational only, not medical advice. Consult healthcare providers for medical conditions.
This post builds on previous discussions about the fear-pain cycle and learned chronic pain. The post adds the following claims:
My first chronic pain developed in the tendons behind my knee after running. Initially manageable, it progressed until I couldn't stand or walk for more than a few minutes without triggering days of pain. Medical examinations revealed inflammation and structural changes in the tendons. The prescribed treatments—exercises, rest, stretching, steroid injections—provided no meaningful relief.
Later, I developed unexplained tailbone pain when sitting. This quickly became my dominant daily discomfort. Specialists at leading medical centers identified a bone spur on my tailbone and unanimously concluded it was the cause. Months later, I felt a distinct poking sensation near the bone spur site, accompanied by painful friction when walking. Soon after, my pelvic muscles began hurting, and the pain continued spreading. Steroid injections made it somewhat more tolerable, but despite consulting multiple specialists, the only thing that helped was carrying a specially shaped sitting pillow everywhere.
None of these pains appeared psychosomatic to me or to my doctors. The sensations felt physically specific and emerged in plausible patterns that medical professionals could link to structural abnormalities they observed in imaging.
Yet after 2-3 years of daily pain, all of these symptoms largely disappeared within 2 months. For reasons I'll touch on below, it was obvious that the improvements resulted from targeted psychological approaches focused on 'unlearning' pain patterns. This post covers these treatments and the research supporting them.
For context, I had already written most of this post before applying most of these techniques to myself. I had successfully used one approach (somatic tracking) for my pelvic pain without realizing it was an established intervention.
Consider two scenarios:
Both experiences involve the same neural pain circuits, but they serve different functions. The first is a straightforward protective response. The second represents neuroplastic pain - pain generated by the brain as a learned response rather than from ongoing tissue damage.
This might pattern-match to "it's all in your head," but that's a bit of a misunderstanding. All pain, including from obvious injuries, is created by the brain. The distinction is whether the pain represents: a) An accurate response to tissue damage b) A learned neural pattern that persists independently of tissue state.
The overall reality of neuroplastic pain as a common source of chronic pain has a broad evidence base. I haven't dug deep enough to sum it all up, but there are some markers of scientific consensus:
Side note: With obvious caveats, LLMs think that there is strong evidence for neuroplastic pain and various claims related to it[2].
(This part has the least direct evidence, as it’s hard to test.)
Pain is a predictive process, not just a direct readout of tissue damage. Seeing the brain as a Bayesian prediction machine, it generates pain as a protective output when it predicts potential harm. This means pain can be triggered by a false expectation of physical harm.
From an evolutionary perspective, neuroplastic pain confers significant advantages:
As Moseley and Butler explain, pain marks "the perceived need to protect body tissue" rather than actual tissue damage. This explains why fear amplifies pain: fear directly increases the brain's estimate of threat, creating a self-reinforcing loop where:
This cycle can also be explained in terms of predictive processing.
In chronic pain, the system becomes "stuck" in a high-prior, low-evidence equilibrium that maintains pain despite absence of actual tissue damage. This mechanism also explains why pain-catastrophizing and anxiety so strongly modulate pain intensity.
Note: Fear is broadly defined here, encompassing any negative emotion or thought pattern that makes the patient feel less safe.
The following patterns suggest neuroplastic pain, according to Alan Gordon’s book The Way Out. Each point adds evidence. Patients with neuroplastic pain will often have 2 or more. But some patients have none of them, or they only begin to show during treatment.
Some (but not many) other medical conditions can also produce some of the above. For example, systemic conditions like arthritis will often affect multiple locations (although even arthritis often seems to come with neuroplastic pain on top of physical causes).
Of course, several alternative explanations might better explain your pain in some cases - such as undetected structural damage (especially where specialized imaging is needed), systemic conditions with diffuse presentations, or neuropathic pain from nerve damage. There's still active debate about how much chronic pain is neuroplastic vs biomechanical. The medical field is gradually shifting toward a model where a lot of chronic pain involves some mixture of both physical and neurological factors, though precisely where different conditions fall on this spectrum remains contested.
I've had substantial chronic pain in the hamstring tendons, tailbone, and pelvic muscles. Doctors found physical explanations for all of them: mild tendon inflammation and structural changes, a stiff tailbone with a bone spur, and high muscle tension. All pains seemed to be triggered by physical mechanisms like using the tendons or sitting on the tailbone. Traditional pharmacological and physiotherapy treatments brought partial, temporary improvements.
I realized I probably had neuroplastic pain because:
Finally, the most convincing evidence was that pain reprocessing therapy (see below) worked for all of my pains. The improvements were often abrupt and clearly linked to specific therapy sessions and exercises (while holding other treatments constant).
If you diagnose yourself, Gordon’s book recommends making an ‘evidence sheet’ and building a case. This is the first key step to treatment, since believing that your body is okay can stop the fear-pain cycle.
Believing that pain is neuroplastic, especially on a gut level, is important for breaking the fear-pain cycle. But it is difficult for several reasons:
Pain neuroscience education
Threat Reprocessing
General emotional regulation and stress reduction
Traditional medical treatments
(Reminder that I’m not a medical professional, and this list misses many specialized approaches one can use.)
I recommend reading a book and immersing yourself in many resources, to allow your brain to break the belief barrier on a gut level. Doing this is called pain neuroscience education (PNE), a well-tested intervention.
My recommendation: “The Way Out” by Alan Gordon. I found the book compelling and very engaging. The author developed one of the most effective comprehensive therapies available (PRT, see below).
Books
Treatment Programs
Therapists
Online Resources
'Central Sensitivity Syndromes' can allegedly also produce fatigue, dizziness, nausea and other mental states. I haven't dug into it, but it seems to make sense for the same reasons that neuroplastic pain makes sense. I do know of one case of Long COVID with fatigue, where the person just pretended that their condition is not real and it resolved within days.
I’d love to hear if others have dug into this. So far I have seen it mentioned in a few resources (1, 2, 3, 4) as well as some academic papers.
It seems to make sense that the same mechanisms as for chronic pain would apply: For example, fatigue can be a useful signal to conserve energy (or reduce contact with others), for instance because one is sick. But when the brain reads existing fatigue as evidence that one is sick, this could plausibly lead to a vicious cycle where perceived sickness means there is a need for more fatigue.
ChristianKI pointed out that the WHO's classification also includes e.g. Chinese traditional medicine. So it is worth adding that the WHO's classification of nociplastic pain was based in large part on the recognition and advocacy by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) which is the leading global professional organization in pain research and medicine.
For example, here is Claude 3.5’s assessment of how much evidence there is in specific areas:
Thanks so much for writing this. I had basically an identical experience of developing chronic pain then spending two years ineffectively treating it with physical therapy before realizing it was psychosomatic and tied to my emotions. Once I read “the way out” I was halfway to being cured and today I feel 90-95% recovered. To anyone reading this in chronic pain there is hope.
I wrote a blog post detailing my experience but yours is much more well researched and I’m glad you are spreading awareness of this.
I think the EA community is probably much more prone to this issue for the following reason: personality traits that are a risk factor for chronic psychosomatic pain are pretty much identical with the stereotypical EA, namely;
Another contributing factor might be that EAs tend to get especially worried when pain stops them from being able to do their work. That would certainly help explain the abnormally high prevalence of wrist pain from typing among EAs.
(NB this wrist pain happened to me years ago and I did get very worried.)
thats quite interesting - the only other EA person who I have discussed chronic pain with actually had severe wrist pain for years and then later attributed it to stress rather than structural damage (they were in their late 20's and 30's) so that definitely fits your observation